@ThomasPornin Could be. I remember my boss being real excited about it a while ago, but I haven't heard anything lately, and certainly nothing since the purchase.
As I've said before, I have little trouble trusting LinkedIn. I just find their service useless for anything other than being contacted by recruiters who haven't read my profile.
I'm not security literate, and if I was, I probably wouldn't be asking this question. As a regular tech news follower, I'm really surprised by the outrage of Anonymous (hacker group), but as a critical thinker, I'm unable to control my curiosity to dig out how exactly they are doing this? Frankly...
BTW @ThomasPornin if you're still around, I'd appreciate it if you could pass an eye over my answer here. I think it's correct, but I'm definitely the sort of person who stops trusting myself where crypto is involved :)
A common way of working for multiple-user access to encrypted data is this, which is a simplified description of a full-disk encryption scenario (a real system might have more levels than described here).
The data itself is encrypted with a content key, Kc.
Kc is stored on the computer n separa...
How do manage database security for SQL and DB2? How do you detect and manage vulnerabilities on databases. I know that this is becoming more and more of an issue in the security world. I know many shops have more and more databases that have sensitive information.
To be more specific on securi...
@GrahamLee Could be. But given that the question already has a downvote from someone, I just have this feeling that it might be better to start over. But perhaps I'm being a little too emboldened at closing based on Jeffs recent blog post.
If bad ones aren't closed quickly, lots of people waste some time.
Personally I think a beta site needs to tread a line: yes we want good quality content, but we also want to attract users. I think we need to help anyone who wants to join to give good contributions, rather than turning away people who don't get it right first time.
@nealmcb They seem to be very similar, and possibly have some of the same members, also the real membership may be dynamic, untraceable. The key difference seems to be only in motivation.
@RoryAlsop As is clear from the name, and as the wikipedia entry documents, lots of people glom on to "anonymous" for reasons that are quite different from a clear identity like Lulzsec, which even has a public bank account (in the form of a bitcoin address).
A common way of working for multiple-user access to encrypted data is this, which is a simplified description of a full-disk encryption scenario (a real system might have more levels than described here).
The data itself is encrypted with a content key, Kc.
Kc is stored on the computer n separa...
