And of course the only real rep train on SEx.SE these last few days was visited by The Bear :P @ThomasPornin welcome to Space Exploration, you Big Rep Dipper you!! :)
Big Dipper is the 7 brightest stars in the Ursa Major constellation, to those that didn't get the reference ;)
I know there are 2 services of VPN (free and paid). Normally, free VPNs need money from somewhere and sometimes they can sell your information to any agency that needs it.
Now, if we are talking about a paid VPN where they use encryption and don't keep any logs or information about the user, IP a...
@tylerl indeed, but that's not my issue with the question... I'm angry I missed easy rep points... I've been fairly busy on Space Exploration last weeks and barely have time even for the review queue here
I wonder if it would be possible to setup a cloud based VPS that provided a VPN service that didn't take any logs. Host it in some country that doesn't observe the rest of the world's view on internet laws.
I have no idea how some of the guys here do it... @RoryAlsop, or @Gilles to name a few... they don't miss a thing here, and then they dare to take time to have fun too? How the hell do they find the time??
@ungerade I've update my answer to cover the case of that provider and other Swedish service providers. Case #1 is a general case when it comes to court orders, and case #3 talks specifically about the "unauthorised use of an electronic communications" which is the legal jargon for hacking/cracking. — Adnan5 mins ago
No i mean hypothetically speaking. Like the example i had earlier, banks in the cayman islands don't adhere by US tax laws, thus people hide money there. An anonymous donation to a local business in the country in question and suddenly you have a VPN that wont log users.
@Adnan Well dunno actually, I have no idea how much more work would that involve considering I'm already fairly active in meta, reviews, edits,... it's uncharted territory to me
@TildalWave how we do it? Bit of an intimate question, innit? Oh, well, it comes naturally. You'll figure it out one day I'm sure. I mean, your mom did.
@Gilles All the mod stuff here on SE + answer tons of questions and good at that too + other stuff (you CTFs for example) + work + family + spare time??
@Gilles well yes sure but it still takes time... I have one answer I write for space open now for 3 days, and I've realized I need to watch some documentaries I wanna reference in it... and I'm about 15 minutes in (out of 2 hours +) in about two days LOL
But it's true it's barely made it to public beta and there's still question that'll prolly later be closed as too broad a lot faster ... but we need canonical Q&A and some are still worth the trouble in the long run IMO
for your enjoyment, I think these are the two answers that took me the most time to write (there may be a few other contenders where I spent a long time thinking or experimenting about potential solutions):
For sure, some of the poems merely set the mood, while other convey background information, though I think you can get by without reading most of them. (This will however reduce your enjoyment of the book — they're there for a purpose after all.)
The Fellowship of the Ring, book one: hobbit and ...
x86
(32-bit a.k.a. i386–i686 and 64-bit a.k.a. amd64. In other words, your workstation, laptop or server.)
FAQ: Do I have…
64-bit (x86_64/AMD64/Intel64)? lm
Hardware virtualization (VMX/AMD-V)? vmx (Intel), svm (AMD)
Accelerated AES (AES-NI)? aes
TXT (TPM)? smx
a hypervisor (announced as such...
As I understand it; being away from earth subjects you to significant health risks from radiation. On Earth most of this risk is deflected by Earth's magnetic field. I did not find a reference but presumably this magnetic field could be duplicated in a spaceship given sufficient energy. I also ...
Problem is, the question only mentions two methods of deflecting harmful particles (there's more than 2), and is not specific about any particles out of many... and then there's loads of mission parameters on which it would depend upon... and so on and so on...
I think the question would come down to weight. I get the feeling that generating a magnetic field to repel particles would be lighter than a mass-based deflection setup. But by the same token, it might be too difficult to generate the necessary power to sustain such a field.
@DavidFreitag well yes, but with a single source of radiation and assuming you don't need to shield the whole of the spaceship, just the habitable space, you could save on weight substantially with the "umbrella" (inverted dish) for example...
@TildalWave Yeah, but then you have to worry about expanding the field to areas that, for example, need servicing etc. You also have to worry about power outages/fluctuations.
@DavidFreitag yes... my list is: proximity, number, activity of radiation source, exposure length, size of habitable areas, reusability of naturally shielded areas, active shielding energy requirements, durability / reliability / servicing, EVA, spacecraft design parameters, mass ratios,... the list goes on
@DavidFreitag I'm actually looking for shortcuts, because similar stuff was already envisioned by many space engineers before,... so I have this 2h docu movie open, waiting... and then a few other PDF documents e.t.c.
@ThomasPornin Go ahead ;) You can reuse from our conversation here, if it helps.... I was thinking something along the lines of what BBC envisioned with Pegasus:
The ability to use a chrome extension to inject whatever javascript you want into a page makes this whole hacking thing much easier. I mean, the stuff on HTS is pretty much childs play to anyone who actually knows what they are doing.
> For the swarm of independent solar panels - yes. We would just need to build a hell of a lot of them - might need to take apart a small planet for raw materials though...