« first day (1000 days earlier)      last day (2938 days later) » 
02:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

22:22
@Will Potential CCCC solution (not too confident): NUTMEAT. The definition is the whole thing (&lit), and the wordplay is to anagram (as indicated by "perhaps") "tan minute" into iNUTMEATn, and then take the kernel (inside) to get NUTMEAT.
Right answer, incomplete reasoning. :)
Note which letters are unused.
I see that it could be "in nutmeat" (or "nutmeat in"), but I don't see how that helps with the indicators.
If "kernel" doesn't indicate taking the middle, what does it indicate?
the kernel of a nut is called NUTMEAT, so it is "in nutmeat, kernel"
perhaps tan minute (iNUTMEATn*); kernel (def)
22:29
Isn't it an &lit?
Yes.
hm
/prepared for groans
So how is "kernel" involved in the wordplay? I don't get it.
it's not. or, it's not a &lit.
or we're both deeply confused. :)
22:30
It is, and it is.
And you are.
Ok then :)
then I'm not sure why GPR's initial answer is wrong.
I only offered mine as a crappier explanation given you said the first one wasn't it. I'm now quite confundled.
Look at where the letters in TAN ended up.
22:37
Beginning and end of NUTMEAT. So?
and the rest is
and here are the groans
???
@Rubio, do you follow?
not in the slightest
22:43
@Will, you might have to spell it out, unfortunately...
hm
So it turns out my attempt to make a comma significant to the wordplay did not work at all.
oh god
@GentlePurpleRain M IN UTE
perhaps tan minute -> UTME in NAT ... somehow ...
but still not getting kernel?
I'm lost. @Deusovi please to explain :)
oh
GOD.
M in UTE is the "kernel" of TAN* (ie it's placed in the center)
22:46
I just just got that
full clue parse should be "anagram of TAN (with) (M in UTE) placed in the center"
That is not kosher.
indeed is ok
Yeahhh. Most of it's fine, but MINUTE --> M in UTE isn't
MinUTE, i'm pretty sure is not.
hehe
22:47
Like I said, INDEED is questionable, but typically allowed because "indeed" comes from "in deed"
Here's another one of the same variety:
Minion wearing knockout getup (6)
K(I(M)ON)O
Easy when you know the gimmick.
I'd maybe accept that as part of a variety cryptic. But definitely not a regular one.
22:50
I'm interested to see your opinion on the final clue of the latest meta
CCCC: Criminals take sanctuary, having at muses. (12)
Finesse contest starts with "Go ahead?" (5)
(the meta)
I hope it's not BLUFF
Can someone fix the stars for me? I'm on mobile.
Sure.
It isn't bluff
22:51
oh, Rubio got it
good. I was bluffing there ;)
Hm, I can't think of anything immediately.
I won't spoil it, but I do have to put my phone down
GRACE?
poor phone. do be sure to give it a proper burial. maybe say a few words.
damn.
22:56
yeah, definitely GRACE
that's gotta be it
G_ + RACE
may I put that in my answer, with due credit?
Go ahead. ;)
Is the quotation section kosher?
22:58
Totally
Ehhhhhh. I don't know.
I wouldn't use it.
why wouldn't it be?
Why would it be?
ahead instead of head?
yeah, using "ahead" as "head"
23:00
Glad you agree haha
it's... questionable
Meh. I guess that is dodgy. But I was looking at it cluing G, so I guess it was effective if not proper. hehe
I mean, there was no oh god moment haha
lol. true that.
The green light clue is what I asked the lit question about
23:02
Yeah, I don't think that would be valid.
There's no def there.
So with the "Yo dawg", I really wanted the contest to be one of the epicrapbattlesofhistory.com
With go ahead responding to unfinished business
If you managed to fit "response to" in there, then that'd be fine, but in this case it'd mess up the wordplay
Right
The yo dawg is from the xhibit meme from pimp my ride
Hm... I was going to make another variety cryptic, but I can't think of a good way to implement the current theme.
23:19
Hang on, the fortnightly theme doesn't have to apply to the WHOLE puzzle does it?
Nah.
As in, it's alright to have a puzzle in which only one section is rebuses
Alright, cool
23:34
If anyone has been meaning to upvote/accept something of mine and not bothering, doing it in the next 25 minutes will enable me to be an Epic Visual Necromancer. (This is not a request for any rep I wouldn't have got at all otherwise. The Epic badge can wait for another occasion if need be.)
wow, that was quick (or maybe it had nothing to do with my comment above) :-). Actually, it looks like today I'm a Nice Epic Visual Necromancer.
3
You're welcome
Nice. Grats @GarethMcCaughan!
(though it hasn't actually given me Epic yet; I assume it takes a little while before one part of the system knows what another is doing)
heh. Whoops @BeastlyGerbil thanks for the metacryptic correction :)
aha, now I'm officially Epic. (One of only three on Puzzling; no prizes for guessing at least one of the others. The corresponding gold badge is Legendary and I think it'll be a while before even Rand gets that one.)
23:49
Congrats!
For some reason, I don't repcap much.
@Deusovi Just glancing at your profile, it doesn't look as if you do so much less than I do. You can't be too far from getting Epic, surely?
Oh huh, I'm at 48/50.
And here's me on 11/50
It's much harder to get lots of rep from good questions than from good answers
and that makes sense on most of Stack Exchange where the answers are (kinda, mostly) the valuable thing
23:55
Most of my rep comes from answers, even though my questions have a lot more work put into them. :/
but it's bonkers on Puzzling where, in effect, the setters are providing entertainment for the solvers
:) doesn't help that I'm not a very frequent poster (of questions or answers) in general
and the solvers get rewarded
so here am I with a ton more rep than Alconja despite contributing maybe 10% what he does to the overall excellence of the site. Sorry, Alconja.
Yeah, my highest voted answer is 12 words long.
595 worth of rep
wow!
and such a crappy question to get all that rep for answering, too :-)
wasn't there at some point a bit of a movement to squelch questions that were "merely" jokes rather than puzzles that happen to be funny?
23:58
Yeah. I remember a discussion that came up around the same time as I answered that one.
Speaking of high score-to-content ratios, this is my favorite answer on Math.SE:
(probably not the only one)
02:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (1000 days earlier)      last day (2938 days later) »