« first day (999 days earlier)      last day (2642 days later) » 

12:38 AM
0
Q: What be these men doing?

Kit-GinevraA great long line of men stands before you Occasionally 2 and 3 stand side by side 1 was a lover. 1 was extremely funny. 2 were winners. 4 were lucky. 8 were from the city. 12 were devout. 13 had done nothing wrong. 14 showed mercy.

 
 
4 hours later…
4:23 AM
1
Q: What is a Trump Word™?

dan04This is in the spirit of the What is a Word™/Phrase™ series started by JLee with a special brand of Phrase™ and Word™ puzzles. If a word (or phrase) conforms to a special rule (and it's a fantastic rule, believe me!) I call it a Trump Word™. Use the examples below to find the rule. $$\begin{...

 
 
2 hours later…
6:04 AM
0
Q: A rebus from a while ago

ConManA few years back, I came up with the following. Can you tell me what the picture is about? A small note for solvers - this does exist elsewhere on the internet, and while I wasn't able to find it on a Google Images search I humbly request that you avoid doing so if you want to find the answer ...

 
 
2 hours later…
user61230
7:45 AM
Waiting for the meta bot to catch up...
 
user61230
8:01 AM
It sure does take a long time for the meat bot to catch up.
5
 
user61230
....that's a typo, but I'm leaving it.
 
8:43 AM
The meat bot is delicious.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:26 AM
4
Q: Should we require that puzzles remain apolitical?

EmrakulI realize this is a touchy subject. I don't want to start a dumpster fire of politics, but I think it's something we should (and can!) civilly discuss. Politics right now is a little nuts. No matter what you believe, and (almost) no matter where you are in the world, I think we'd all agree on tha...

 
user61230
10:50 AM
@PuzzlingMeta FINALLY. JEEZ. WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG.
 
1:13 PM
@Emrakul I dropped my two cents in your bucket.
 
1:26 PM
@Randal'Thor sorry about that "you're" I obviously wasn't paying attention/tired, I normally don't make those mistakes.
 
0
Q: The Vacuumed Quotes

LevieuxA colleague of mine likes to put his favorite quotes up on the fridge using those little magnetic letters. This morning the cleaner came and accidentally vacuumed up all the letters. We were able to retrieve all the letters (100 in total), but unfortunately we can't remember any of the quotes. Ca...

 
@dcfyj I think our answers are saying more or less the same thing, only you've said it more succinctly while I've included a lot more detail and justification and background info and examples.
 
@Randal'Thor I was thinking the same thing
You are rather more verbose than I am after all :P
I think they should probably both stay, but do you want me to remove mine?
 
@dcfyj No, of course not! If anything it helps to see that at least two people feel strongly enough the same way to post answers.
 
true
 
1:37 PM
There could also potentially be an issue with puzzles which don't seem political at first glance, but turn out to have political solutions.
Like a cipher puzzle whose plaintext is e.g. "Nigel Farage has a punchable face".
 
Like I said specifically in my answer, as long as they keep it neutral and aren't praising or bashing someone or other, I see no problem with it.
 
But that's an orthogonal issue really. Whatever our stance is on political puzzles, it won't affect those 'hidden' political puzzles until they're solved and then will become relevant after they're solved.
 
Of course we can't stop people from posting ciphers with "punchbag faces" but we can do something after the fact.
And as emrakul said, it's not really a problem, just a potential one
 
I've seen this kind of thing happen before: what seemed to be a perfectly valid puzzle getting deleted once it was solved.
 
Which is unfortunate, but if it's offensive then it doesn't really belong anyhow.
 
1:41 PM
I suppose my point boils down to, what makes politics different from any other subject?
 
Just that people are touchy about it for whatever reason
 
Deletes puzzle because I find its lack of faith disturbing
 
Some people will get all nasty and abusive when discussing politics, but others won't, and SE bans nasty/abusive stuff anyway.
Well ...
Some people will get all nasty and abusive when discussing religion, but others won't, and SE bans nasty/abusive stuff anyway.
Or gardening. Or programming. Or anything.
 
Clowns.
 
It's a problem with the people, not the topic.
 
1:43 PM
Some people will get all nasty and abusive when discussing [Insert subject here], but others won't, and SE bans nasty/abusive stuff anyway.
 
Damn, I should probably overhaul my answer to make these points more prominently.
 
Go for it
 
That's kind of what I got from your answer, tbh.
Perhaps I was biased by my personal opinion - not sure.
 
2:28 PM
bleh, I do not feel like doing work today. time to make a puzzle
 
2:59 PM
I've posted some rhyming cryptics!
+ would probably have qualified for Unconventional Tag Fusion if I'd posted it during that challenge.
 
0
Q: Riddle Poem Two

mkinsonMy first poem’s response was poor. Perhaps solving it was a bore, But I do not feel sore Because I find it fun, And I’ve plenty more For you to explore Like this one! Although a bit of a chore Matching the rhyme to score, The puzzle scheme’s the core So get your but up off the floor, A...

1
Q: Three Blind Mice - rhyming cryptics!

rand al'thorEach line of the following poem is a cryptic clue. Free blind mice with spirit are bound; Hack tail off, our first glorious inch. Tool is almost fine after quick sound; The mice's tails in the breeze did flinch. I'll provide the word lengths too, but in a spoilertag in case you want t...

 
3:18 PM
@Sphinx Apparently I chose a lull time in site activity to post this :-/
 
3:28 PM
The riddle poem is really broad ...
@Randal'Thor you fit as an answer?
 
@Matt ?
 
Riddle Poem Two
it's just a rhyme with no real direction
but your name fills the rhyme
 
Rand's first poem had a poor response??
 
@Matt Oh right!
:-D
 
answered because I can't see the poem pointing to anything specific besides itself and its predecesor
 
 
1 hour later…
4:52 PM
Morning everyone!
 
hello!
I've got 7 minutes of morning left
 
Good Aftermornight @Deusovi
@Matt We're in the same timezone! (Depending on what your thoughts about noon are)
 
I mean, noon is pretty clearly defined as 12pm
aka 1 minute from now
 
So yes we are then :P
 
5:34 PM
0
Q: A riddle from HQ

MelkorHere's a riddle haiku from HQ: I am just on fire! A fun, diverse distraction. This ilk but more known. What am I?

 
5:54 PM
0
Q: What kind of people can answer this riddle?

histocratWhat kind of people can answer the following riddle? Call a=1, b=2, and so on. What is the longest common English word that can be made from only prime letters?

 
6:18 PM
0
Q: I'm Wandering About - A Riddle

Matt I'm wandering about. There's always blue overhead. The dear ones frolic, And few words are said. Or, maybe I'm a place. A creepy lake forked, And I'm locked in its shadow, My key worn and warped. No, I am here - Embodied by this very text. Think about what I'm doi...

 
6:42 PM
Good Aftermornight @MariaDeleva
 
@MariaDeleva A quick thought, you might want to link to the original numberless sudoku from your current one. People who didn't see that one would have no idea what they're looking at or how you'd go about trying to solve it.
I meant to say that a while ago and kept forgetting :)
 
Are you talking about the "sudoku" with the greater than and less than signs?
 
Yes
 
Isn't it tagged as enigmatic? I looked up sudoku with signs (or something like that) and found out what they're actually called (can't remember at the moment) and how to solve them with fair ease.
 
Well - I mean - puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/47987/empty-sudoku-puzzle was the one Maria quite recently posted, and if you'd seen it you'd know immediately what you're looking at and exactly how it works. People who hadn't seen it, though, would be at a bit of a disadvantage in getting started.
 
7:01 PM
I never saw that puzzle, but as I said, I found how to solve them with relative ease.
Good Aftermornight, by the way
 
7:22 PM
@Randal'Thor there's no indirect anagramming going on in your rhyming cryptics, right? I feel like I have an answer if there is, though it needs a little more work, but I would rather abandon it if I know for sure there's nothing shady going on :)
 
Referring to "Free"?
 
@Rubio I actually don't remember exactly how the clues work now (don't worry, I have it all written down, but it's been a while since I made them), so I can give you a "no comment" without any possibility of you working out the actual answer from that non-answer.
 
lol.
and yeah, referring to "free"
 
According to this site it's a possible anagram indicator
 
It is, yes.
I'm not asking for a hint, btw - I'm asking for a confirmation it's a proper clue. (indirect anagrams are, well, not proper)
 
7:27 PM
I was looking at anagrams of blind/blind mice to no avail
 
What would be "indirect" about using "free" as an anagram indicator?
 
If we're looking for a synonym of blind, would be my guess
 
Or to put it another way, what do you mean by indirect anagramming?
 
nothing. what would be indirect is if you were using "free blind mice" to, say, remove the "i" from mice and then anagrammming "MCE".
 
That would be a cool set up, if it were done so that there's no indirect
 
7:29 PM
or in the alternative, anagram a synonym for "blind", as dcfyj mentioned.
 
@Rubio How would that be indirect? Looks to me like just applying two consecutive operations to the same argument.
As long as the operations are associative, and there's a clear ordering if they're not commutative, I can't see a problem with that.
 
It's indirect because the indicator isn't next to the word it's manipulating (at least that's how I'm understanding it)
 
Um. Because you're not applying an anagram indicator directly to the stuff being anagrammed. You're doing it to the result of some other non-verbatim fodder. That is, literally, indirect.
For my example, "Free mice blind" and "Free blind mice" are different. One's legal ... the other isn't.
 
@Rubio Hmm, I don't see it that way. Applying two wordplay operations consecutively to the same base word doesn't make the second one indirect, it just makes it ... the second one.
 
Free and Blind are both adjectives for Mice, they should be applicable in any order
 
7:33 PM
You can see my mathematical training coming out here :-)
 
(assuming that's a thing that's happening here)
 
Yes but it doesn't work that way. Anagram fodder is expected to be verbatim. Full stop.
 
Hey, all! Perhaps it is a nice idea to put a link to the original empty sudoku. But anyway, the sudoku doesn't seem to be the problem. :) Although the newest answer might as well turn out to be on the right path...Waiting for explanation
 
I remembered a cc Deusovi helped me with

Demonic pets reform endless mafia with deceivers (9)

consecutive indicators is valid
@Rubio according to deusovi anagramming a word that you remove a letter from is fine.
 
That's not what he said. Read it again :)
 
7:37 PM
Jan 31 at 19:36, by dcfyj
Can you have sequential indicators for the same word?
Jan 31 at 19:38, by Deusovi
f(g(x)) means "apply g first, then f". It's slightly different here since you can put the indicator on either side, but the same principle applies.
That is exactly what he said lol
 
Hmm
Maybe I misremembered that conversation then
 
@MariaDeleva Sorry, Good Aftermornight :P
@Rubio Feel free to reread
 
Good Aftermornight! :)
This time I am here :)
 
:)
 
What about good Postmanoctis?
 
7:42 PM
I'm seeing the pieces but that's a bit rough to read :S
 
Heh, I guess I can't think of a good one :)
 
7:57 PM
@dcfyj (back) ... yeah so, ok I apologize then, it was my quite distinct impression that anagram fodder was quite literally supposed to be exact and verbatim. It's even stated that way, in bold, in @Deusovi's guide: "the text to be anagrammed must appear verbatim in the clue." So color me puzzled. :)
 
@Rubio Well... it does
 
I think by that he means don't use synonyms
 
M(-I)CE anagrammed still has MCE verbatim
 
mce does appear in the text, but I get you're point
@Sconibulus the issue he has with it is the fact that the I is missing
 
I might want to update that to be more clear, then. The text can appear amongst other text - it just can't come from synonyms or be extracted (like "with heart of stone" cluing "add O to this anagram").
 
7:59 PM
@Rubio The text to be anagrammed, or to have other wordplay tricks applied to it. In the same way as you shouldn't use "blind rodents" to clue MCE, you shouldn't use "free rodents" to clue ECMI, but "free blind mice" to clue ECM would be OK.
(Still no comment on whether or not that's my intended meaning, though.)
 
I mean. "MCE" is not verbatim in the text. MICE is.
verbatim
adv 1: using exactly the same words; [...]
 
@Rubio MICE is, so the operation "blind" could be applied verbatim to MICE to get MCE, and then the operation "free" could be applied verbatim to MCE.
 
if you want to get technical, "verbatim" can't be used to describe it because it deals with words, not to the granularity of letters
 
Here's an example you can use :P

Demonic pets reform endless mafia with deceivers (9)
 
I'll ask Deus next i see him for some clarification, as I've actually never seen an example of anagramming the result of wordplay on verbatim text, other than @dcfyj's example. of course I haven't got nearly the experience many of you others do
 
8:01 PM
Um. Hello. I'm here.
2
 
lol, that was my thought
 
oh. Hi, I missed your last message lol
 
2 mins ago, by Deusovi
I might want to update that to be more clear, then. The text can appear amongst other text - it just can't come from synonyms or be extracted (like "with heart of stone" cluing "add O to this anagram").
 
paging @Deusovi ... anyone seem him?
 
@dcfyj this is less helpful without the answer :)
 
8:02 PM
Nope, no idea where he could be
 
Deusovi knows the answer :P
 
He's probably slacking again
 
If he's forgotten I can put it up again
 
@Sconibulus FAMI(-a)*+LIARS
 
he's never around when you need him
 
8:02 PM
(I know the answer too. And I like it, I just didn't really read that deeply into the revised clue to see the thing I didn't think you could do)
 
@Deusovi checks Rubio's "ignored users" list
:-P
 
I mean, I wouldn't blame him. :P
@Rubio - I've changed the phrasing there. How does this sound?
"the letters to be anagrammed must come directly from the clue."
 
@Rubio This was in his original answer post Just like all the other clues, they can be combined with other clue types
But I understand where the confusion came into play
@Deusovi I think that's a lot clearer.
 
8:19 PM
We have a new puzzler :) Who seemed to have found the final solution of my puzzle.
 
Yep!
@MariaDeleva: "However, in order to accept one answer as the answer, it needs to have the full solution of the puzzle, including every clue described."
That's not necessarily true.
Often, an answer with just the final bit will be accepted.
 
Well, true. But the puzzle is still missing on some of the clues. Also, three different people solved the puzzle. - how can I accept only one answer?
 
Well, if she put that stipulation on her puzzle than the solver needs to address it, no?
 
Also, even in some meta questions regarding questions/answers, people state that sometimes the asker might require a better/fuller explanation before accepting the answer. I did upvote his answer.
 
Oh, I'm not saying you should accept it. (I'm not saying you shouldn't either.) I'm just letting you know that that's not a sitewide standard.
 
8:27 PM
She never said it was, but I can see how it could be misunderstood that way.
 
For the metacryptics I accept the first answer with the final solution
sometimes that answer includes all the previous solutions, sometimes not
 
By the way @Deusovi, did you see the cryptic-ception puzzle I posted? (I know it was easy, but I thought it was a cool concept)
 
The three people commenting there are Deleva, Delaveau, and Desuovi
I mean the answer to Maria's
 
Yeah, I did! Didn't get a chance to jump in before it was solved, but cool nonetheless!
 
There is a glitch in the matrix. It was supposed to be Deulovi :D
 
8:29 PM
@Deusovi You should write one sometime, they're an interesting challenge to make.
I still wish I could've gone 3 layers like I wanted, but it was getting too big way too fast.
 
Oh, I would like to see a cryptic puzzle by Deusovi...
 
@Randal'Thor lol. Sorry, actually Doing Work - it's hard to concentrate on PSE/TSL when, you know, the boss is talking in your ear.
 
@Rubio what work? Are you slacking on us? :P
 
I am, I know.... (*hangs head in shame*)
 
@MariaDeleva He's made them before
 
8:31 PM
I've made several puzzles based on cryptic clues. Chess Fortnight (the meta-metapuzzle with cryptic clue answers) and Plenty of Clues (the fishy variety cryptic) are my two biggest ones.
 
Well, no one would be hurt of some new ones :P
 
lol
I thought you hated cryptic clues, @MariaDeleva
 
I've got a few variety cryptic ideas saved up - I might just make one for this fortnightly theme
 
Cryptic clue rebus? That sounds unpleasant...
2
 
@dcfyj, nope, I don't hate them - I am just bad at making and solving them. But I find them amusing.
 
8:35 PM
Oh, I just thought of a very interesting cryptic puzzle. It'll probably take me a while to make it though.
(Interesting might be translatable to nasty)
 
Oh no.
 
how do you make cryptics?
like, do you come up with a word, and try to think of ways to clue it? Or do you find interesting wordplay and look for a related word?
 
For free-standing clues, I look for words with interesting patterns
(eg OVOID is O + VOID, both of which could be clued by 0)
 
@Sconibulus I usually try to think of a random word that I can clue wordplay on.
I'll be honest, I saw the purplish/pink icon and I thought it was maria asking that until I posted in chat and saw sconibulus.
 
8:50 PM
wait, did my gravatar change, or do I just not remember my life
for some reason I thought it was brownish
 
not as I recall
 
I remember pink
 
fair enough, I guess I'm just crazy
3
 
I remember it as pink as well. It might have been brown on another site, though, so you might not be crazy.
 
9:24 PM
@Sphinx Next logical step is to make a rhyming metacryptic. Whoops, that's already been done (shameless self-promotion :P).
 
9:42 PM
@Sconibulus I agree with D and D: I pick a more or less word and think "what can I do with this?". If you're making single clues rather than whole crosswords, you have the luxury of deciding that the answer is "probably not much" and trying again; I think on average when I post a clue it's for the second or third word I've tried. I'm particularly keen to spot things that will make for a nice surface reading.
So, for instance, a while ago I thought (I have no idea why) of SEISMOGRAPH. The word SMOG in the middle stood out, and then the word SERAPH around the outside. I realised that both of those had links to coal, and had a vague recollection of something earth-shaking in the biblical passage relating seraphim to coal (actually that turned out to be not quite right, but the idea was OK), and I knew that there was going to be something there that would sound pretty good.
(sorry, "a while ago" = "on solving a CCCC a while ago". I don't have a stash of these things, I make them as the occasion requires. Though, now I come to think of it, having a stash might not be a bad idea.)
 
10:10 PM
0
Q: Raven's matrices

MCraig1100Is anyone able to solve this matrix? It came up on a practice aptitude test I'm taking and this one in particular had me stumped. Thanks!

 
 
1 hour later…
11:29 PM
0
Q: Another dissection puzzle

Martin Rattigan The figure shows a hexagon and triangle tiled by six identical tiles. My question is: What is the smallest number of polygonal tiles that will tile both a regular hexagon and an equilateral triangle in such away that all the edges of the tiles are all parallel to an edge of the tiled figure? ...

 

« first day (999 days earlier)      last day (2642 days later) »