last day (572 days later) » 

21:00
Would copular verbs need to be any different from normal ones?
@RedwolfPrograms I went to get a snack
well, they need to be able to target adjectives
Oh, good point
We could cheat and do something like "[Subject] is a [adjective] thing"
special WR: all 8-syllable words mean "peanut butter with marmalade"
21:03
What have I missed?
oh yeah should we have a shortcut for a generic noun that is specified by some adjective
Like, "I like the red car better than the blue?"?
@RedwolfPrograms I spell I like the red car better than the blue car
@hyper-neutrino Maybe a word like "one" would work
And we could have an animacy distinction even, so you have a good way to refer to a person in general
21:06
I like the red car better than the blue variant
@hyper-neutrino I support having a noun for "thingy," yes
So you'd basically be saying "the blue one"
what have I missed?
21:06
new words?
dammit computer restarted so I lost all the words I wrote down
one sec
you can scroll to the top (maybe not on mobile) and press "load to my last message" and read from there
I think pronouns (and the "thingy" word) should be our next thing to work on
And then defining some basic vocabulary
WR: y (n): thingy
2
21:08
was about to ask about word structure then remembered we did that
so I can be y izl
I also support having a generic verb, as Mark Rosenfelder says exists in Quechua: "Wallpata narankichu? ‘Did you do that thing to the chicken?’"
WR: mi: First person pronoun
Although you could end up with my mi pretty often
True, lol
Perhaps we should have an adjective for "mine"
21:10
vaiksal is pronounced "see-sharp", right?
@RedwolfPrograms Nintendon't
@RedwolfPrograms I think genitive + pronoun should do fine
Anyone here speak some non-romance languages? i'd suggest more pronouns but I don't want to clutter them up with english/spanish-like ones
Should the word for "us" be related to the word for "me", or do we want them completely different like in European languages?
@Wezl-acautionarytale I'm changing it to lano bc nouns can't end in i
(Or, rather, the words for "us" if we're doing an inclusive vs exclusive distinction)
21:11
WR: mak (n): A person
unless that is the plural
@GingerIndustries They already changed it to lan
1 hour ago, by Wezl - a cautionary tale
so this+that+former+latter can be pronouns
wait that's word singular
21:13
No, we decided singular has no ending
IIUC hindi uses demonstratives even for people, which is handy
So lan is one word, lani is words, and laniiiiiiii is when class is almost over but the teacher's still talking
@RedwolfPrograms Just take an English/Spanish pronoun and change all the letters to something completely different. ;)
WR: nimak (pn): most recently mentioned person
2
21:15
WR: shu: Second person singular pronoun
WR: pasmak (pn): second most recently mentioned person
2
I've been holding off on inventing more pronouns until we're decided exactly which ones we want and how they're related
@DLosc Good point. I figure 1st/2nd singular are likely to be unrelated in any way, but I'll hold off on any more
@RedwolfPrograms Looks like you didn't change all the letters :P
21:17
So we've agreed on inclusive/exclusive 1st plural, did we decide whether "with you" and "with y'all" would be different?
you, tu
can you say "sir [noun] [adjective]" to say "[noun] is [adjective]"?
@RedwolfPrograms I don't think the latter is going to be a very useful distinction
@Wezl-acautionarytale We'd been discussing that, you'd need y I think we decided
Like sir [noun] su y [adjective]
@Wezl-acautionarytale Another possibility is that "[noun] is [adjective]" sentences don't need a verb at all: you'd just say "[noun] [adjective]"
21:19
That feels kind of weird though
"sir noun adjective" is like saying "there exists a adjective noun" more than "noun is adjective" ig but it still makes sense
We should make it so that saying a noun before another noun imples ownership, so "Big Shaq, the one and only, Man's Not Hot" is an official part of our grammar
@RedwolfPrograms A lot of languages do it that way. But we can use a linking verb.
WR: aaaaa: pain
I suppose we could do that then
komy izl would then mean "the monkey is bitey"
Instead of needing to say si komy su y izl
21:21
I'm interpreting izl to mean dangerous
conlang design is almost as fun as proglang design
@Wezl-acautionarytale Actually, I quite like this.
WR: maka (pn, intj): All people in the discussion / "Hey everyone!"
@GingerIndustries Is that like saying "hey everyone"?
21:24
maka, komy izl! pas si [to warn]
We really need more words lol
I cannot find pas si in the list
pas si is was
(If si is our copular verb)
(We've got multiple rn, and none are really that good)
Example of copular verb in english?
be/is/are/am/was/were
IdiomR: baka mitai: I've been a fool
21:25
oh
@Wezl-acautionarytale I think that's an interjection
@Wezl-acautionarytale ಠ_ಠ
WR: baka (n): A fool, who is often sus
@RedwolfPrograms why not just use one of them with tenses like everything else
@Wezl-acautionarytale I support baka for "fool," but what's mitai?
21:26
it's really the only phrase we need in our language
@RedwolfPrograms good lord
WR: baka (pn): The fool in the conversation
WR: sus (adj): To arouse suspicion; to possibly be the impostor
should be mi baka
sus is a verb and an adjective
you can sus
21:27
How about the verb is susin
@RedwolfPrograms yes
susin mi su Ginger
@RedwolfPrograms ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Hmm, what would our names be? Do we keep them the same, or convert them to use the language's phonetics?
@RedwolfPrograms I vote for same
because easy
21:29
I'm fine with Rydvylf
what is su again?
Case particle for direct object
for copular verbs, I propose just using si with the tense modifiers
@hyper-neutrino Okay, but like if we were going to make that a phrase in the conlang, it should have meaning in the conlang. We seem to have moved past that point, tho.
@Wezl-acautionarytale very helpful for conversations. "fool says that tabs should be used. I say that space(s) should be used"
21:29
@RedwolfPrograms Category?
@RedwolfPrograms All words in that category?
pas/ni/fy, ta/su/lia
@RedwolfPrograms Definitions?
is that past/present/future?
pas/ni/fy are past/present/future tense, ta/su/lia/my are subject, direct object, indirect object, and possession casing particles
21:31
right
sir shu su mak vaiksal: "You are a bad person"
(Although I don't think vaiksal should mean bad outside of memes)
@RedwolfPrograms remember, vaiksal is pronounced like the letter "c" :)
@RedwolfPrograms People who like Vyxal are free to interpret "bad" as "bad@$$"
That definitely will not create any issues lol
21:33
Actual word for bad should be owo :P
@GingerIndustries Maybe ovo?
How will our numbers work?
We need nineteen
@DLosc it's pronounced "owo"
oro would be closer if you want to keep the pronounciation
Since our phonetics allow pronouncing r as w
21:35
okay, oro
this is basically a meme language :/
ktom o izl my mi su mi
3
what was the main purpose of this language again?
21:35
@GingerIndustries Not really, just meme word suggestions
A word's only a word if people use it
"My bitey cat is eating me"
I need to learn this language so I can understand stuff
please help
ktom is "to eat"
grammar, not words
I have the full word list right here gestures at screen
21:36
my mi is "my"
So o izl my mi is "my bitey cat"
And su indicates mi is the object (what's being eaten)
komy
yps
the thing is, I came up with the word ordering and still don't get it :/
It takes some practice, it's a lot different from english
[to eat] [possessed] [cat] [possessor] [me] [object] [me]
"ta o izl my mi ktom su mi" is also valid, no?
21:38
no because verb is first
Ah yes, eating posessed cats
9
not that kind of possessed
possessed by kind and tasty owners
I mean, I suppose mi my [demon] would mean "I am possessed by a demon"
Can someone formally define the word ordering? I need a cheatsheet
The word ordering isn't really that important compared to the casing
21:39
one sec
really it's just "verb comes first" and that's about all there is to it
you can reorder the nouns however you want because of casing and that can probably lead to some natural emphasis of the important parts of a sentence based on the ordering chosen if it's flexible
I propose dfbct for demon
hm
@RedwolfPrograms Hrm. That might or might not be grammatical... it glosses to "the demon's me" or "I of the demon" in English
dfbt
that sounds bad
21:41
you kind of need vowels in every word
Do you, though?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
intarnit for cursed
We already have words like ktom and izl which are probably getting schwas implicitly added
21:42
intarnit my maka
are there not implicit schwas in "hyəperəneutərino"?
@pxeger I need write access to the repo to update the word list
ta  [noun]  The subject ("I" in "I am selling your food to Mr. Mann")
    [noun]    Implied "ta"
su  [noun]  The direct object ("your food" in "I am selling your food to Mr. Mann")
lia [noun]  The indirect object ("Mr. Mann" in "I am selling your food to Mr. Mann", usually only shows up with words like "say", "give", or "sell")

[noun] my [owner]   Indicates possession; in "I am selling your food to Mr. Mann", "food" is the noun and "you" are the owner
2
@GingerIndustries did you accept the organization invitation?
@Wezl-acautionarytale yes
21:44
you should be able to edit, no?
I do not have write access
because the word list is owned by the organization
I don't have write access either.
@GingerIndustries "All of us are eating"
21:46
is cats "i" or "oi"?
ktom maka su oi
We need a word for "to say"
21:47
ktom maka ta mi
That has two subjects
@RedwolfPrograms sy
24 mins ago, by Ginger Industries
WR: maka (pn, intj): All people in the discussion / "Hey everyone!"
@RedwolfPrograms grammar hard
Are you trying to say "I am eating everyone"?
21:48
do we have a dictionary somewhere
no ktom mi su oi
ktom mi su maka
@hyper-neutrino working on it
@RedwolfPrograms maybe
how do we negate verbs
@GingerIndustries Hyper has it, it'd be ktom mi su maka
21:48
also what were our tenses again?
pas (past), ni (present), and fy (future)
ktom ta mi su maka to be complete but the ta can be omitted
@hyper-neutrino no pas ktom shu su mi
@RedwolfPrograms ty
And ni is optional
21:49
back
what is the no here
Maybe it can be like an "I eat" vs. "I am eating" thing?
what did i miss?
continuous could be a separate tense
21:49
Where ni implies it's sort of more-right-now than no tense
past, present, future is really oversimplified
@RedwolfPrograms I was thinking that if you include ni it emphasizes that it's happening right now, yeah
why is it "ktom" not "nom"?
@Wezl-acautionarytale Because nom was too obvious. Believe me, I thought of that first.
okay ktom is funner anyway
21:50
WR: hai (intj): Hi
how about ha is singular hi, hai is plural hi :P
maka my mi
@Wezl-acautionarytale I like it!
@RedwolfPrograms VTC as duplicate of hiya
you are all mine?
21:51
WR: hada (v): To say something
(So we have a verb to play around with that can have an indirect object)
@Wezl-acautionarytale evil laugh
susin Ginger
pas hada mi "komy izl" lia shu
"I said 'the monkey is bitey' to you"
* pas hada mi
Oh yeah, I thought I was missing something
21:54
hada mi lia o
wrt punctuation let's allow commas outside of quotes plz, e.g. "what", I said
And to emphasize different things, you could say pas hada mi lia shu "komy izl" instead, which means the same thing but emphasizes that I said it to you
@RedwolfPrograms Or even pas hada lia shu ta mi "komy izl"
how do I say "me too"?
21:55
We need a word for too, yeah
I was also going to reply me too but couldn't
fy hada mi "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
hm
sy fy [do] shu
"Yes, you will"
We need DLosc's generic verb
o kat hiya
WR: makima (intj): Me too
For passive tense, do we just not include a subject?
21:57
@RedwolfPrograms We can borrow it straight from the Quechua inspiration:
ktom su o my mi
(My cat was eaten?)
WR: nai (v.): do something (unspecified)
2
I feel like there should be a bot that translates this language to english.
21:58
NO GUST!
@GingerIndustries I think there should be a "too" word, so you can say "... too" not just "me too"
@grandBagel good idea
@Wezl-acautionarytale ama: too
@RedwolfPrograms Seems reasonable
idk what part of speech that would be
Let's formalize it
WR: ama: Too (in the meaning of "me too" or "in addition")
Since "too" can also mean, like, "too expensive"
@RedwolfPrograms part of speech?
Good disambiguation

  last day (572 days later) »