I wonder how well sites like these will age. In 5 years you'll still have questions about Windows 2003 clogging up your search results. Every basic entry-level question will be answered, so there's no point of entry for newcomers trying to gain some points.
I never made the connection that Joel's software company is the same people that make Fog Creek Copilot, a remote support tool that is on my list to evaluate here shortly.
It appears that the first tag is what is put in the page's meta description tag. I wish it was all of them... but then again it would look ugly in search results I guess.
@Farseeker My partners parents are landlords of the local pub. The games machine runs Windows 2000 and the jukebox runs Windows 95! "Terminal" style stuff always seems to run ancient operating systems
I saw a question today, the guy said something like "I'm using the current version of Ubuntu server", and just tagged it with "ubuntu". Made me wish I had 2k rep so I could just throw 10.10 in there.
@kennyr, yes. If someone is trying to find an answer to a generic question they would probably look in [ubuntu] not a version specific tag. If a generic tag wasn't found they may ask a new one where the only difference is the version number.
It does. Sometimes I think it would be useful if there was some tag relationships other then just a synonym. So ubuntu and ubuntu-10.10 are somewhat linked. So displaying the contents of the [ubuntu] tag displayed the subtag, but if I went to the version specific tag [ubuntu-10.10] I just got 10.10 stuff, combined with a suggestion to consider using the less specific tag.
Not sure if there is a meta feature-request about that already. i suspect there is though.
A very simple version of it would simply be that [ubuntu] includes all subsets if [ubuntu-*] as this would work for [windows] and [office] and dozens of other tags
I tend to tag broad to narrow, probably a bit to overzealously: Windows, Server, Windows-Server, Windows-Server-2008, Windows-Server-2008-R2 ; And then I get frustrated that I ran out of tags to also put Microsoft, Microsoft-Exchange, Microsoft-Exchange-2007, Microsoft-Exchange-2007-SP2
Heh, yes. I sense hackness in your future as well.
Our 2010 project has been on hold for... 3? 4? months now because of OWA. Apparently MS made it much, much harder to put an SSO solution in front of OWA. And that? That changes the user experience. We have Issues with that around here.
Even I sometimes forget to change the external message, and I'm intimately familiar with the whole setup. Those poor sales girls in our office who can barely turn their computer on are doomed
Yes, we have the same UX problems - all of a sudden when a mailbox moves, their OOF changes. It's really hampering us moving people over at the minute while we have to write notes with pictures et al for our users
Writing "this is how you do it now" is easy. The office politics with the senior managers is the fun (?) bit.
We need to get approval from our desktop people before we get the 2010 CA servers in the loop. People will have to log in twice to get to email. And budget wrestling has pushed the UI approval to the bottom of the heap whilst we wait, and wait, and wait.
We're working on a project to migrate employee email from Unix/open-source (courier IMAP, exim, squirrelmail, etc) to Exchange 2010, and trying to figure out options for single-signon for Outlook Web Access. So far all the options I've found are very ugly and "unsupportable", and may simply not ...
Also, with the current size of my window currently the line break happens directly between the 'Windows Server 2003 R2' and '64 bit'. Oh well, I need a downvote anyway. It really bugs me when my reputation is not evenly divisible by 10.
@Zypher, any chance they will be giving us a running count of how many people have voted on the elections? I am curious how many people are acutally voting.
Or does someone believe that can be used to game the system somehow?
But telling us the stats after don't let give us the chance to start bugging people and telling them, that they should vote.
@Farseeker, perhaps it had to be longer for stackoverflow since there where so many candidates? We had so few here, and they where well known it was pretty easy.
I will say though that the idea of mid-term elections seemed friggin crazy when I first heard of it, but once I was taught the logic behind it, and understanding that your president is elected independantly of the senate, it made more sense
I liek the idea that you get to choose your leader, in the british system each party presents you a leader and you vote for the party, not the leader
Which leads to fun situations like we had in Australia where we all loved this guy called Kevin Rudd, and we all voted for his party, and then he was stabbed in the back by someone else in his own party and we've got someone that nobody likes or voted for
actually, it's pretty fun here, you arn't voting for a candidate you are actaully voting for a representative for your state to the electoral college who has pledged to vote for that candidate
in most states they arn't bound in any way to actually vote the way they pledged
Our elections cause befuddlement. The whole Primary thing is there to whittle the slate for the General election down from way-lots to few, and participation in primaries is minimal.
But what happens is that certain states get very republican or or very democratic... so you want to vote the other way and you live in that state it doesn't really matter
So presidents spend all there time in states that could go either way
@Zypher When have you voted for your electoral college rep?
Also, looking at the Ohio state breakdown is hillarious because there's this puddle of blue at Cleveland, a puddle of blue at Columbus (both major metro areas), then a puddle of blue in Athens (not a metro area).
And now I'm caught up to like 5 hours ago. Enjoy making sense of it :)
The Electoral College consists of the popularly elected representatives (electors) who formally elect the President and Vice President of the United States. Since 1964, there have been 538 electors in each presidential election. Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution specifies how many electors each state is entitled to have and that each state's legislature decides how its electors are to be chosen. U.S. territories are not represented in the Electoral College. The Electoral College is an example of an indirect election.
The election for President and Vice President is ...
Unfortunately, it was originally designed to work in a world completely foreign to our own, in a culture completely foreign to our own, and has only been made weirder along the way.
I kind of feel like we built up to the Windows ME of electoral process.
yea, if we where gonna do that i think the 40-50 years ago would have been a better time ... but yea that would take an amendment and those uhh are hard to do even when the majority wants it
I think the most floppies I ever saw was for Office 95. Only 11 or so.
I used to download MP3s on the family computer that was internet connected, then use Stuffit to compress them all into one archive and segment it into 1.3MB chunks to take back to the Mac in my room.
For a few reasons, we recently changed the guts of how search works on our sites. If you keep up, you've probably read somewhere that we were using SQL Server Full Text Search. There are a few areas that utilize search that all got a replacement tonight:
Search itself (box in the upper right)...
@Farseeker Farseeker, if you're using Mac OS X, maybe try out "The Unarchiver". I've had good luck using it to expand files compressed with the more arcane formats, including StuffIt.
Hey, I don't know if this is the proper place to bring up an issue like this, but does anyone else think that this user's meteoric reputation rise is slightly suspicious? serverfault.com/users/67876/osdyng
I mean, he seems to know his stuff, but he's answering a lot of questions from people who seem to be new registers themselves. Dunno... seems slightly suspicious.
I flagged one of his posts for mod attention and explained my suspicions.
Half of his answers don't have any upvotes. If he's gaming the system, he's either great at it (masking the fakes with noise) or terrible (forgetting to upvote his own answers.)
@WesleyDavid Interesting blog, btw. For a while I have been considering starting a blog about my IT experiences, but I can't figure how to reconcile being public against my (perceived) need to keep details about my employer secret.
Honestly, even asking questions on SF sometimes makes me uneasy!
Maybe I came off as being too dramatic; I just prefer to have a disconnect between the company's reputation and my own. It's not like I have a military clearance.
@Zoredache btw that 32/64-bit question, he had edited, so you're answer was right until he did - thought you should know (presses imaginary up arrow :) )
Yep your wikipedia link... seems fair to me. And I've always believed that the amount of work that goes into an answer should be related to the amount that went into the question.
@Chopper3 There was a story in the Metro this morning about some guy getting turned away from McD's for not wearing the proper attire. Apparently they're now refusing people wearing tracksuits and hoodies after 8pm
Huh. The Vote to Close box has changed.. Can't offer migration suggestions any more :(