A useful little quirk about the 747 is that it can ferry a fifth engine on the wing, for when another aircraft is stranded somewhere in the world.
Does the A380 have the same capability? If not, how would an airline manage an aircraft needing a new engine whilst away from a maintenance base?
The TS15A is rated for 130W (Wraith is specified for 125W) but AMD seems to be using a larger fan than what is on the TS15A which should mean lower noise.
The Airbus Beluga XL is a planned large transport aircraft based on the A330-200 airliner, to be the successor to the Airbus Beluga. The XL has an extension on the fuselage top like the Beluga. It is being designed, built and will be operated by Airbus to move oversized aircraft parts. The program was launched in November 2014 to build five aircraft, with 30% more capacity than the existing five Belugas. It will be able to carry two A350 XWB wings instead of one. The design freeze was announced on 16 September 2015, final assembly should start in 2017, and service should begin in 2019.
The aircraft...
Intel's design is a single large vapor chamber in the center of the unit, with metal fins extending from it and a fan on top. The AMD design is more traditional, with a series of heat pipes that nearly make direct contact with the CPU package.
Intel's design is a single large vapor chamber in the center of the unit, with metal fins extending from it and a fan on top. The AMD design is more traditional, with a series of heat pipes that nearly make direct contact with the CPU package.
The TS15A is a very interesting cooler design. I don't recall anyone using a big vapor chamber in this fashion before.
@JourneymanGeek Older Intel coolers, e.g. RTS2011AC, used a solid copper core. This was replaced with a vapor chamber ("heat column") in the TS13A, and the TS15A is an extension of this design.
The AMD Wraith seems to use a beefier fan (for lower noise) mated to a more traditional heatsink design with heatpipes.
Anonymous
The coolest (no pun intended) heat pipe animation yet
Welcome to the Stack Exchange Podcast episode #70! Today's podcast is brought to you by the BB-8 droid. Today your hosts are joined by developer Jason Punyon, whom you may remember from way back in Podcast #21. Punyon works out of balmy Buffalo, NY. (Here's the Buffalo sentence they talk about for a weirdly long time.)
Controller throttling shouldn't be a major issue in most consumer use cases, but heavy workloads can cause the drive to overheat.
Maximum temperature rating is 70 °C (which is typical for most SSDs); throttling occurs at about 75 °C.
Even SATA SSDs have it easier because they can use the case of the drive for passive cooling (most SATA SSDs have a heat pad between the controller and the case).
I am willing to test of BX200 for OS and proper SSD for work data works. or if I should banish the BX200 (worst case it will replace a 300GB WD black which fails unless I connect 2 USB ports
@Hennes Unlike the BX100, however, it's built on TLC NAND. That is not ideal for workloads that are even remotely heavy (unless it also uses 3D NAND; see Samsung SSD 850 EVO).
...and there is no getting around the fact that TLC is slow—although once again, Samsung's 3D TLC NAND implementation does not suffer as much especially at higher capacities.
(The 250 GB version of the Samsung SSD 850 EVO is rated for 300 MB/s write speed once the TurboWrite cache is exhausted.)
Afterwards I might add 2x2TB (mirror) as main storage, 1x 1TB SSD and a 951 as OS disk to get a main new desktop. And possibly move my gForce 960 for graphics, While keeping the old X58/i7-920/ RAID with 4x1TB RAID 5 as backup system
I have the SSD 850 PRO, which uses 3D MLC NAND with very high endurance. It was very expensive when I got it for Christmas 2014 (we paid $350 for it) but it's pretty much the best SATA SSD you can get.
The 850 PRO is ideal for workstation users looking for reliable storage with excellent all-round in any workload, light or heavy, random or sequential. It's much cheaper than PCIe SSDs these days, even if it can't match their performance.
It's also available in very high capacities, up to 2 TB, with a 4 TB version to be released later this year.
I'd recommend 256 GB for everyday users and 512 GB or 1 TB for power users (depending on whether you have large applications such as games and/or a mechanical hard disk for bulk data storage).
128 GB is marginal for modern systems and should only be considered if you have a very limited budget. It's also not the best value as cost per GB is considerably higher on very small drives.
TLC NAND drives use a simulated SLC cache to try to make up for slow write performance in typical consumer use cases. Once that cache is exhausted, however, you wind up seeing the slow performance of the TLC.
Samsung has a better time handling this because they use TLC in conjunction with 3D V-NAND but it's still slower than MLC NAND (3D V-NAND or otherwise).
@bwDraco Not true; there are 4 TB 2.5" HDDs available in an external hard drive form factor. If you have the right tools, you can rip it out of the enclosure. I was looking to not have to do that.
The underlying Samsung Spinpoint M10P disks are 5-platter.
sigh
Gotta replace the cyan cartridge on my printer soon, it's down to 2%.
Note that I always have a full set of cartridges on hand so this isn't really an issue but replacing a cartridge always involves a full cleaning cycle.
The cartridges are not cheap ($30 for C/M/Y, $35 for K) but the yields are decent at 1050 pages each.
This is a SOHO-grade printer. Cheaper consumer-grade printers are generally much worse.
At the low end of the spectrum, HP's cheapest Deskjet printers use type 61 cartridges. Yields are horrendous for the standard cartridges (190 black, 165 tri-color). High-yield cartridges are a bit better (480 black, 330 tri-color) but are $80 a set, much worse than the $125 a set for 1050 pages I'm getting.
Then again, HP printers with integrated-head cartridges tend to be more reliable than Epson printers with permanent heads in the occasional home printing use case. We've had HP 57 tri-color cartridges last years without clogging before they needed to be replaced.
Epson printers are more economical for heavier usage.
This trend towards TLC SSDs is not a good one. TLC NAND has poor endurance (1000 cycles or less) and while SLC caching helps, the SSD will dramatically slow down once the cache is exhausted.
Samsung is able to mitigate the effects of this very well because of their 3D V-NAND technology, but everyone else is having trouble keeping up.
PC World's Jon L. Jacobi is a huge critic of these TLC drives.
> the TLC is slow, and there’s not nearly enough SLC cache to maintain performance during even modestly large file transfers
...and there are use cases in a consumer environment where this will be an issue.
The 120 GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO is not immune to this issue (it drops to 150 MB/s once the SLC cache is exhausted). However, the 250 GB and larger models are much less prone to this kind of slowdown due to larger caches and the underlying 3D V-NAND is faster even though it is TLC (250GB model: 300 MB/s after TurboWrite is exhausted).
Samsung's implementation still suffers from a small cache but they have better NAND (and smarter controllers) which means the impact of exhausting the SLC cache is nowhere near as noticeable.
He'll have the account until a mod on a site he's signed up for has manually destroyed him. I don't know if it's network wide without a community mod, though
Today's compact cameras have more sensor resolution than ever but it seems that resolution is never really attained.
With slow lenses (leading to diffraction limiting) and high noise even at base ISO means, I'm getting the feeling that more pixels are not worth the extra storage.
@bwDraco iirc changing the resolution is tell the camera to save a scaled-down version to the memory card (i.e. the sensor still captures the full 16MP and then rescales it before saving)