@Bob oh, on another topic: remember my Yoga 2 with a Pentium N3520? I tried Hearthstone on it this weekend... it was awesome... the performance is basically what I'd expect; very acceptable FPS, rendering detail was perfectly fine, no artifacts... running default (shipped with Windows 8.1) Intel HD Graphics driver
granted, Hearthstone isn't a super demanding game, but I've seen people who stream Hearthstone have FPS drops during recording, so it's certainly a bit more hungry than web surfing
and the loading screen took a bit longer than on my desktop
(disk-bound, most likely)
also, playing Hearthstone -- a card game -- with a touchscreen is fantastic
my Surface Pro, whose CPU and iGPU absolutely obliterate the N3520, plays it faster and even more enjoyable, even on highest detail, and it's sooo smooth because the SSD loads it fast... but my Surface Pro sucks for typing because of the stupid detachable keyboard
why did I think I have a Surface Pro 2? I don't have a 2!
so yeah, eight of these are the most you can get on a single logical board as of now; to go faster on one logical OS you'd need some kind of supercomputer interconnect
@Bob yeah... although honestly, back when I needed a new license of Windows and I didn't have one and didn't want to buy one, I used Windows Server 2008 R2 on my desktop in lieu of a Windows 7 Pro/Ult license... academic license of Server
aha, jokerdino the "ahh-starrer" is here... I need to find some information to provide to @JourneymanGeek that he didn't know before, so he says "ahh", so @jokerdino can star him ;)
So I was downloading naughty things and accidently installed several pieces of software. Now the computer is running super slow. It takes about 20 minutes to boot up whereas before it took around 2. I think it is low on ram so I googledand a site told me to download more. So how do I go about dow...
What does the Bob say?! "Can we fix it? Yes we can! Can we fix it? Yes we can! Can we fix it? Yes we can!" What does the Bob say?! "Ready, Steady, Build! Ready, Steady, Build! Ready, Steady, Build!" What does the Bob say?!
I was suspicious, because during our last call, we already collected dumps of the crashing SNMP service (the actual issue) and I assumed the solution was only a quick debugger run away
So, it turns out the update rollup fixes 1000 things, none related to SNMP
"Can I install an updated Nvidia driver to solve these random artifacts in Word 2010?" "No, keep using the one from 2010, because everyone has to suffer through the same problems for 6 years"
@Bob @Bob @OliverSalzburg the tech probably searched MS Answers for the result instead, and the answer told him to throw his computer into a lake (source) (source)
@allquixotic @Bob @Bob @OliverSalzburg the tech probably searched MS Answers for the result instead, and the answer told him to throw his computer into a smelting furnace (source) (source) (source)
!! s/@Bob @Bob @OliverSalzburg the tech probably searched MS Answers for the result instead, and the answer told him to throw his computer into a smelting furnace \(source\) \(source\)/the tech probably searched MS Answers for the result instead, and the answer told him to jump into a smelting furnace/
@allquixotic @allquixotic the tech probably searched MS Answers for the result instead, and the answer told him to jump into a smelting furnace (source) (source)
Was Google Desktop ever capable of doing a local image file search by using another image as input?
I'm looking for that kind of solution. I've been searching far and wide but haven't found anything as simple, and effective as the Google Image Search.
That of course only works if the files are stored on a web server and indexed by Google.
The move away from local storage to cloud storage is pointed out as the main reasons why Google decided to discontinue Google Desktop.
"In the last few years, there’s been a huge shift from local to cloud-based storage and computing, as well as the integration of search and gadget functionality into most modern operating systems. People now have instant access to their data, whether online or offline. As this was the goal of Google Desktop, the product will be discontinued on September 14, including all the associated APIs, services, plugins, gadgets and support."
@sammyg what do you mean? finding images that are somehow "visually similar" (the definition of that is completely arbitrary, unless you use some specific mathematical algorithm, but even then, it will have worst case behavior for some kind of images)
what's the point of finding visually similar images if you already have the image?
I only have a small version of it. And I cannot for the love of God remember where I had put it, or what the original file name was.
Having 13 partitions only makes things even worst! ;)
I have reduced the number of disk partitions to 9 now by merging some of them. Still work in progress... I plan to have maybe 2 partitions for my data and 1 partition for OS.
The best tool I could find for finding "visually similar" images are different duplicate finders. But those tools usually fall back on file name search, size compare, hash compare, etc. before they actually compare the visual similarity of picture files, and then yet some of them don't even go that extra mile.
Content-based image retrieval (CBIR), also known as query by image content (QBIC) and content-based visual information retrieval (CBVIR) is the application of computer vision techniques to the image retrieval problem, that is, the problem of searching for digital images in large databases (see this survey for a recent scientific overview of the CBIR field). Content-based image retrieval is opposed to traditional concept-based approaches (see concept-based image indexing).
"Content-based" means that the search analyzes the contents of the image rather than the metadata such as keywords, t...
What Google does is known as "reverse image search" and Google Image Search is just one of many CBIR "engines".
This is a list of publicly available Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) engines, these image search engines look at the content (pixels) of their images in order to return results that match a particular query.
Commercial CBIR search engines
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Name
! Description
! External Image Query
! Metadata Query
! Index Size (Estimate, Millions of Images)
! Organization Type
! License (Open/Closed)
|-
| [http://www.picalike.com/products/similarity-search.php Picalike]
| CBIR engine for Mobile and eCommerce
| No
| No (additional filters can be added)
|
| Private Co...
So what I need is a server, a database, a CBIR engine, plus tons of reading to set this up... it's way over my head. Lolz! :)
@OliverSalzburg Have you had any luck building your own search engine? :)
Here is the sample picture I used. I will upload it. It's just a cropped version of the original.
Try to put that in on Google Image Search, and on TinEye. See who finds it first. :)
TinEye has a much bigger database. And probably better optimized algorithms.
Google doesn't even find it. But when you throw the original image from Devian Art at Google, it finds it too. Probably thanks to additional metadata embedded in the file, as well as 1920x1080 px full res.
Just proves the point that TinEye is a better image search engine (or at least a better reverse image search engine) than Google.
@OliverSalzburg Thanks for the suggestion! Yes, this program compares visual similarities between images. But the only problem with it, like with most duplicate file removal tools really... is that it can only operate within a given set of folder locations.
You can't tell to take one single file or a folder as reference, and compare it to a whole set of folders and files. Sort of like cross comparing...
Clonespy http://www.clonespy.com
I find this very helpful and more useful than doublekiller. A particularly nice feature is the "Pools" feature, where you can compare one group of directories with another group of directories while ignoring duplicates within the groups.
For example, my partner...
This is the one duplicate finder I have used in the past. It's my favorite . It allows you to define two "pools" of file and folders. Then it allows you to compare pool to pool.
Another powerful tool for finding those pesky dupes is called Anti Twin. I've used this one on several occasions. It's very high quality, great set of features and great appearance, and it's freeware.
I don't think it has the option to cross compare between two sets of folders like Clone Spy does.
Another one I used a lot in the past was Moleskinsoft Clone Remover. It was a shareware but it worked really well. It looks like the website is gone now. Only available from various download sites.
Again the, problem with these tools is that they don't allow you to cross compare single files or folders to another set of files or folders. So far, I think Clone Spy is the only I have come across that does this.
They just search for duplicates based on file names, size, hash, etc. in a given folder and its sub-folders, and they only find duplicates within that folder tree.
Then of course, they are no revers image search software. Only some of them actually do a visual comparison of picture files. Those are usually the ones that are tailored for finding duplicate photo files. Moleskinsoft used to have that feature.