« first day (1171 days earlier)      last day (4142 days later) » 

00:33
Question. There's this person not too familiar with Windows who's apparently with MDN and all that stuff at work, who's been told by Microsoft support that no ISO would exist for Windows 8.1 Could someone help him find his ISO?
Bob
Bob
01:33
@Ariane MSDN*
MSDN => Microsoft Developer Network
MDN => Mozilla Development Network
@Bob Right.
Bob
Bob
anyway, image restore done
I'll throw the links at him.
Bob
Bob
time to stick the HDD back in and pray it works
Oh, it worked? Me I can't restore system imaged.
Bob
Bob
01:35
@Ariane MSDN most definitely has the ISO
Images.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane What do you use to take the images?
eeeehm
what was it.
some command prompt command.
Bob
Bob
dd?
You can just dd the image back on
or is it a Windows command? o.O
restore works! :D
@Ariane in case it matters to you, i checked out the user thing, and found something you could glance at about the users stuff. Right click a Mydirectory like myvideos and see that a tab called location exists there. (as it doesn in win7 and XP.
01:47
@Psycogeek Yeah, I know about it. Useless though.
Bob
Bob
uguguhguhughFUCK
2
A: Windows 8.1 RTM installation crashes

NikolaDIn 99% you have a device which driver causing this issue. Try to remove any external USB devices first. if the issue still occurs, than remove any additional cards you have in your PCI/PCIe slots. In most cases it is the device/driver issue. You can try to locate the device that creates the issu...

> If you have a WiFi adapter with the Ralink chip, than just remove it as these Ralink chips have a huge issues with 8.1. Stay away from Ralink if you want to use Windows 8.1
-_______________________-
what a waste of a day
LOL.
Oh and @Bob. The command was recimg -CreateImage C:\RefreshImage.
@Ariane It could be concidered the windows method for doing it. which may or may not have less problems.
Bob
Bob
@Ariane oh, that's for the refresh thing
I never trusted that
I just took a full disk image with Acronis
I don't think refresh images work across OS ugprades anyway
@Psycogeek It does have less problems but it's useless when your main concern is moving the AppData folder.
@Bob Haha, but it was a 8.1 image for a 8.1 OS. :p
Bob
Bob
01:51
@Ariane oh, dunno then
wait, was it for when you tried to move the Users folder?
it only backs up "apps and programs"
not user data
Hah?
jrg
jrg
so, i'm going to drop windows 8, it sure was fun, but the crashes that have come with 8.1 are just unbearable.
Bob
Bob
@jrg do you have a Ralink wifi card perchance? :P
Whatever it backs up, the tool couldn't find any image anywhere
Bob
Bob
Win8 is far more stable than 8.1
I just restored my backup
jrg
jrg
01:53
@Bob Intel, but the nvidia card just vanished, and it does a BSOD every once in a while with the message of "critical structure corruption".
Bob
Bob
ah.
mine would BSOD if the wifi card was in
it also woldn't use the ATI GPU
and somehow dropped out of UEFI boot intol egacy mode
jrg
jrg
do you have a intel GPU as fallback?
Bob
Bob
what a clusterfuck of an upgrade
@jrg yep
jrg
jrg
because what you're describing is like 2/3rd of my problems.
Bob
Bob
it's normally switchable
jrg
jrg
01:54
yay! \o/
Bob
Bob
but I just gave up on it because of the wifi card before I even bothered trying to fix the GPU issues :\
@Ariane right, and the appsdata thing is already a messy compatability redirection. something I would avoid adding another cross linking to. Then in resources monitor in the Disk tab, it would be interesting to see how the "responce time" changes as these added cross links are there.
jrg
jrg
i think i'm going back to ubuntu on the hardware, visual studio can live inside a VM.
@NathanOsman Welcome to Root Access chat for Super Users! I am this channel's helpful chat bot. Please don't ask if you can ask or if anyone's around; just ask your question, and if anyone's free and interested they'll help. For bot commands, type !!listcommands
What the...
jrg
jrg
01:55
@NathanOsman just nod your head and say yes
Nods head...
lol
Bob
Bob
@jrg eh, as I said I'm just dropping to 8.0, which works fine for me
Still not sure if I prefer the Ubuntu or Windows upgrade process
Windows at least does the automatic restores well, but it can be hard to find the cause of problems
Ubuntu... well, normally I can patch up a halfway failed upgrade, but things break
that time I tried to go 10.04 => 12.10 step by step on a VPS? good lord.
LOL
jrg
jrg
darn... just realized that the only thing i'll actually miss will be Artemis. and we've got a Artemis tournament coming up in less than 2 weeks... dangit.
i guess i have to go to 8.0
01:58
10.04 - 10.10 - etc?
Bob
Bob
@Braiam ya
that was bad
@jrg Artemis?
jrg
jrg
@Braiam oh dear me, @bob, you have my sympathies.
holly molly, why not LTS?
Bob
Bob
@Braiam 10.04 was LTS
but I needed a new kernel
jrg
jrg
@Bob tl;dr: Star Trek Star Ship Bridge Simulator.
Bob
Bob
01:59
with IPv6 NAT support
@jrg ah, nice
LTS to LTS, 10.04 to 12.04?
Bob
Bob
@Braiam I don't think that was an available upgrade path?
jrg
jrg
it's an available upgrade path
it's just even more hairy in some respects
Bob
Bob
ah. must've missed it.
still, I don't think that would've stopped the hundreds of "X configuration file has been changed. would you like to (A) keep the old one (B) use the new one (C) manually merge" (paraphrasing)
jrg
jrg
Yeah, those are annoying.
02:01
meh, on those cases I just copy my /etc somewhere, uninstall every service, etc, then upgrade bare minimun
jrg
jrg
ew
Bob
Bob
urgh
I'd rather just backup, install fresh, and manual partial restore
Yeah, me too when possible.
Bob
Bob
which is what I ended up doing anyway
I don't always have the time for that though.
02:02
@Bob I'm talking when you don't have phisical access to the server ;)
Bob
Bob
it's just a lot more work than a quick do-release-upgrade, but the latter breaks so often I don't know why I bother
This time around, all upgrades seem to have been a success (one Win8.1 upgrade and three Saucy upgrades).
Bob
Bob
@Braiam I don't!
tar czf /backup.tar.gz /
wait a bit, and there's the backup!
oh well...
Bob
Bob
@NathanOsman Congrats :P
02:04
@Bob tried koding yet?
@Ariane an example of recursive windows psycosis of appdata is shown here superuser.com/questions/359254/… (and other places).
Bob
Bob
@Braiam nope
@Psycogeek That's because people copied something without ignoring junctions, and problems like that happened.
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek They just keep getting cheaper! lowendbox.com/blog/…
@Ariane What else would be there, that would write like crasy? the temp net files, which are movable via internet options, and never has an issue when moved that way. then java and flash. The large flash moveis are stored in net temps right?
02:11
It's when you copy a user folder, with say Robocopy. If you don't give the right instruction you get in an endless loop
Bob
Bob
@Psycogeek Right - to minimise symlink redirects, the best way is to do the registry move followed by a symlink for compatibility with the stupid programs that use hardcoded paths.
@Bob Ok, on that i dont understand, because the hardcoded original applicationsdata folder doesnt exist in reality , or i thought it didnt, it is just inaccessable in the system. because another program shows that the folder does exist.
thats the part I wouldnt understand at all yet. that is the compatability, for the data in the original applications data to be forced to go to the new location.
I dont have the linkviewer program thing installed yet , some thing called hard links, so that ends my ability to tell anything for now.
hurts my brain, but if its a hard link, then that wouldnt work outside of the partition (because it is hard) So when they move it to a different partition or disk, they out in a soft link (one that would re-aim to anywhere).
Bob
Bob
02:29
hard links are strictly for files only
directories cannot be hard linked
@Bob crap thats right. so the redirection method that does not get translated well when usingthe wrong copying method is _____?
directory junction "The Application Data folder in that location is not a normal folder. It is a folder Junction and is normally hidden, by default. The only reason that the junction exists is to redirect legacy applications, that are hard coded to look for that folder, to the new location"
And its when they screw up the permissions/protection that they end up with the recursive. Oh i remember that :-) when i did permissions on the other stuff , that wasnt fun.
A junction is a hard link for directories but unlike file hard links you can create junctions that span multiple partitions
02:55
---"if you don’t “get” junctions and file-system-level redirecting, if you don’t understand why you might need to reset permissions on your user profile folder after you move it (or how to do that), or if you don’t understand how to copy your user profile in its entirety (hidden and system files included), then perhaps you shouldn’t try to use this method. "" no shit :-)
---•If you are using Windows XP, you will run into a bug with NTFS mount points.
•If you ever try to upgrade Windows, you may run into problems because of the redirection.
•If your destination folder is on a different volume then permissions will not be inherited and you will have to set the permissions on the destination folder manually (just copy them from your existing user profile folder).
•If your profile grows to be larger than the free space on your primary OS drive (usually C:), then you may have problems if you ever delete your user account and choose to “save the files” rather tha
Ok dudes that can write 20 pages about this crap, and still bugger the whole thing up, and i would want to use these redirect a redirection methods for what reason :-)
03:17
My setup has to include being able to drop out the drive that the stuff was moved to, because stuff happens. what provision has been made in any of this for the moved users profile to not exist temporarily? none. so they are missing a whole lot of other caveats like "windows has helpfully made a temp profile"
With these methods i end up with 2 drives that require a backup for the "system" disk, which might completly defeat my reasoning behind haveing a seperated system and data disk. System recovery being dependant on things dangling off of other drives, that the system will freak out about, would ruin the whole idea of and impervious system.
boot configuration data file missing? = bricked? Flash screwed up need socketed bios thats bricked :-)
BSOD on Surface RT after installed Win 8.1 youtube.com/watch?v=AHrht3FFPOo ""But I could fix by "bootrec /rebuildbcd". ""
 
1 hour later…
05:37
complete transaction
Bob
Bob
06:27
@JourneymanGeek ehhh
I'm not trying that shit again
you have REALLY bad luck ;p
Bob
Bob
tell me about it -_-
when I was changing the wifi adapter, I was looking for an Intel one too
but no, just had to go with Ralink
the one that came with the laptop was a RT3290... I wonder if that would've worked?
but no 5GHz suport, so bleh
heh
thats annoying me
nearly nothing has 5ghz support
Bob
Bob
most mid-high new phones do now, and have for a while
@Bob: my tablet might my laptop dosen't nor my desktop.
Bob
Bob
06:35
desktop, I'd say is your own fault considering you chose the card :P
nope
built in into the motherboard
Bob
Bob
laptops, yea, they often don't come with it
@JourneymanGeek waitwhat
never seen that o.O
@Bob: its super common
Bob
Bob
Dell laptops tend to use Intel chips, which are dual band AFAIK
well, its a non-standard add-on card
@Bob: mine is a corp model laptop, so... 2.4ghz only intel
mine's an older model I guess
Bob
Bob
06:38
> MediaTek has a strong commitment to PC OEMs. We are continually striving to provide excellent Windows driver support for our customers. Below you will find drivers and supporting information for everything from Windows 9x to Windows Vista™. Any questions, please contact: [email protected]
UHM
or a lower end one, single wifi antenna, not dui
@Bob: only until vista man. Cause vista is where its at!
Bob
Bob
I think imma go update them on the year
 
1 hour later…
07:56
Thanks @Journeyman Geek. Downloaded and installed syberduck, but have some problem with connection - my real machine have this ip 192.168.1.2, virtual this one 192.168.1.4 what should I enter in Username(admin name of my real machine?) and password( to my linux VM or password to my wirless connection?). Sorry for stupid question. I appreciate your help — kuzyo 10 mins ago
facedesk
Bob
Bob
@jou wat
08:54
@Bob Couldn't you get another USB wireless adapter for Windows 8.1?
09:15
Private label products or services are typically those manufactured or provided by one company for offer under another company's brand. Private label goods and services are available in a wide range of industries from food to cosmetics to web hosting etc. They are often positioned as lower cost alternatives to regional, national or international brands, although recently some private label brands have been positioned as "premium" brands to compete with existing "name" brands. Richelieu Foods, for example, is a private label company producing frozen pizza, salad dressing, sauces, marinad...
Colorful and Supx are examples of private labeling?
unlikely
I doubt DX would bother ;p
Bob
Bob
@Boris_yo difficult
I need 5GHz
I do have a USB one, but it's very inconvenient on a laptop
I also can't just grab any random half-mini-pcie card - HP whitelists only a few specific models with their own BIOSes
09:32
There are miniature USB wireless adapters but I did not see them in 5GHz frequency.

You are using HP laptop? You cannot use random PCIe cards if they are not included in whitelist? If so, is it troubleshome to find one that is approved by HP?
Bob
Bob
@Boris_yo The mini ones tend to have absolutely crap performance.
Not much of an antenna in one.
@Bob Due to limited power supply and form-factor?
My old HP had Intel PRO Wireless 3945BG adapter.
and a non existant antenna
Bob
Bob
09:49
@JourneymanGeek Pretty much.
Even the larger USB adapters only tend to have a small internal antenna.
The internal PCIe one has a large antenna that loops around the screen.
or a pair of patch angennas
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek ?
@Bob:my old laptop had two flat flex-pcb atennas
*antennas
Bob
Bob
ah
again, anything that sticks out is bad
09:59
@Bob Sticks out from laptop?
@JourneymanGeek No, not DX. Colorful and Supx are the ones involved in private labeling. DX just takes those brand's products and sells them.
However I saw some DX minor products with DX name on them so who knows...
Private labeling is big on Amazon Marketplace though. You can have several shops selling similar product but branded under different names which only adds to confusion. Since almost everyone can open there store, no wonder I see so many chinese sellers there. Amazon Marketplace turned into another online ecommerce chinese gadgets store.
10:35
@Boris_yo when ebay/paypal raised thier take (fees and percentage) to such a large percentage of the sales, lots of people moved or Also solde on amazon. each with thier own advantage disadvantage.
@Psycogeek I heard several times that eBay is a bish scumbag to small businesses.
wonder how much it has to do with . .Everytime anyone sets something up with a corporation with invester people, the investors expect the ceo and all to continue to increase profits. General practices are to get a whole lot of people into something, then rape thier pocketbooks till you have leeched it all dry. I dont think there is anything in the corporation hadnbook about Killing golden gooses. Seems that the investors will gladly take everything they can.
Even if that means the company has no future. The investors (who have the power of the corporation) dont rightly care, they just move the investment money to a different location.
The "people" who socked thier lives and businesses into these huge corporations, spend many many hours even years getting a handle on working that way. When the corporation comes along to rape them, they can either bend over, or lose everything they worked for.
So regular people who get involved deeply into such adventures with places like e-bay or mabey facebook ? or any of these thing, should realise they may have to walk away at any time. Then Dont Keep all your eggs in one basket.
10:57
@Psycogeek Are you telling me that eBay's aim was to suck investor's pockets or people using eBay?
@Psycogeek If investors invested money into corporation that did not bring any returns, can't investers do something about this legally to not come out with losses? Or company can hide behind "Bankruptcy" excuse?
@Boris_yo I am saying it was "required" to take everything , and in ebays case that really screwed a lot of the normal sellers. And of course people buying.
@Psycogeek With eBay and Facebook it is small businesses and small and big advertisers?
@Psycogeek Required? Why? By whom?
@Boris_yo with e-bay it was thousands of small sellers, who got hurt the worst from excessive fees (aka high profits) Has facebook started raping all the millions of people who invested thier time on a facebook page yet?
@Boris_yo required because a corporation is set up to make profit for the people who invest thier money into it.
@Boris_yo they cant legally do (much of) anything, investments are known to have risks, unless it was fraud or theft ? If they are getting a loss they can bail out. Most of the leeches know when to bail out. it is only foolish regular people who invest that do not know when the gillotine is about to come down :-)
The investors can vote to do things, like fire the boss, make less profit temporarily, potentially all the investors could vote to reduce the fees, but why would they do that? instead they can find another startup that will pull massive profits eventually.
The wrong thing for the US was when this activity of risk based or gambling on companies , was when massive investments were going to be lost , because the companies were greedy and huge and in to deep, the goverment comes along and "fixes it" for them. That would be like you betting on a 2-1 horse and loosing, and the government handing you back your money :-)
Because they needed the horse to run in the next race , so they can tax it to death.
11:17
What is the fastest transfer speed you can get with a SATA II or SATA III hard drive and a SATA II controller?
Is it really no more than about 100 MB/s?
@Sammy what is the platter speed RPM rotation?
The most common, 7200 RPM, 32 MB cache.
Desktop size, 3.5 inch drive. WD Caviar Black.
should be more like 150 MAX for sequential read ahead, defragged etc.
the density of the data on the drive is very important too
OK, so number of platters counts?
More platters is better?
@Sammy i dont know , seems like they would have multiple heads/platters working as a team, but i dont know if they do or not.
11:23
@Sammy: fewer platters and the smaller the better
so the fastest you can get from a consomer drive is from a single platter, 2.5 inch effective 10K rpm velociraptor
It's the 1 TB WD Caviar Black WD1002FAEX
64 MB cache, not 32.
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek wait what
more platters => parallel?
@Psycogeek They can fire boss? What if that boss is CEO of company? So their strategy is to "exploit & dump"?
@Sammy nice warrenty
I get 102 MB/s average in HD Tune. Is that bad?
Bob
Bob
11:25
@Sammy 3.0 Gbit/s not counting overhead
@Boris_yo Yes , from what i understand a CEO is the boss and they can and do get retired , i mean fired :-)
Do SSDs have more lifetime? It should because it has no rotating disk but I have read the opposite
Bob
Bob
With the 8b/10b encoding, you'll have a max of about 2.4Gbit/s (300 MB/s)
@khajvah the flash chips degrade with use
@Sammy average sounds mostly ok. one part of the drive can be about or as much as 2X as fast as the other.
Bob
Bob
SSDs don't suffer the catastrophic crashes HDDs can with vibration, but a HDD in a stationary system currently can outlast SSDs - it's a bit of a crapshoot
11:28
How do they come up with numbers like 1.5 Gbps, 3.0 Gbps, and 6.0 Gbps?
SATA 1 is 150 MB/s but 1.5 GBps?
SATA 2 is 300 MB/s but 3 Gbps?
SATA 3 is ? MB/s and 6 Gbps?
I need to get a new hdd or ssd for my home directory
so, I should stick with HDD yet for more reliablitity?
Bob
Bob
@Sammy Gbit = Gigabit
8 bits per byte
MB = MegaByte
@khajvah hard to say
SSDs do tend to be more consistent with their lifetimes
some brands aren't as good, though, and the controller chip can die
SSDs have limited writes
effectively unlimited reads
@khajvah: in most cases, the effective old age related lifespan of drives is quite long
Bob
Bob
they'll die faster if you write a lot
in all cases, always have backups
@Bob Yeah, but Google says 150 MBps = 1.171875 Gbps
Bob
Bob
11:30
it's impossible to say a drive will definitely last some amount of time
but things break. There's less things to break on a SSD, but they wear out predictably
@Psycogeek So government chose to protect investors rather than companies in order to secure ROI for investors so companies can tax them?
Bob
Bob
@Sammy why not?
@Bob not 1.5 Gbps
Bob
Bob
150 MB = 0.15 GB = 1.2 Gb
11:30
@Sammy: close enough for government work ;p
@khajvah If you have a laptop, the answer is much easier. even hard drives with really good safety dont like to be dropped
@Bob: I'm pondering trying to rebuild a battery pack for a laptop.
@Psycogeek Weird. A person who founded company can get fired. But his company is still in his possession?
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek yea, flash chips wearing out are predictable. but the early controllers tended to die quite hottibly
its going to be a bad Idea, I know ;p
11:31
hm, I don't really read/write that much, I will code/compile so I guess it doesn't matter
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek ...don't use the cheap cells
@Bob: controller failures, by nature are unpredictable
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek nope
@Bob: but but....
where's the fun in that!
unpredictable
Bob
Bob
controller fries, you suddenly have a non-working SSD
no warning whatsoever in most cases
11:32
@Bob: missed an unsomewhere
@Bob lol
and I've lost hard drives that way
Bob
Bob
yea, controllers can always die
SSD controllers just tend to die more often nowadays
it's newer tech, and has to cope with much higher throughput
@Bob: I just assume everything will fail
and have multiple backups on seperate systems
Bob
Bob
lol
11:34
150 MB/s is 150*8=1200 Mb/s
1200 Mb/s is 1200/1024=1.171875 Gb/s

So how the hell is this 1.5 Gb/s then?
Bob
Bob
yep, backups are the only predictable option
@Psycogeek What do you mean about Facebook raping millions of people? By constantly changing interface and privacy rules?
Bob
Bob
@Sammy Didn't I say it earlier? You're not accounting for overhead.
Heck, Wikipedia even spells it out.
> Taking 8b/10b encoding overhead into account, they have an actual uncoded transfer rate of 1.2 Gbit/s (150 MB/s).
The raw data rate can never be reached. In this kind of situation, not having parity/error checking bits is stupid. That's why they're there.
@Boris_yo I am not sure the goverment was going for bailing out gamblers :-) but they had to keep the company alive, that is thier golden goose. Plus the goverment has put peoples retirement money into some of these companies . and on and on with a vicious circle of hands in the pot, and butts on the line. . . over a risk ?
Bob
Bob
Sacrifice a little bandwidth for the security of knowing you're not getting garbage data.
11:38
@Boris_yo Not sure about whos possesion. my simple knowlege is that a public company becomes Public. the ownership is the people holding the stock. so indeed the Former owner can be fired, unless he still holds the 51% of the stock thing? If they go public, everything changes, your not the "owner" anymore, your a stock holder and subject to the stockholders.
@Psycogeek So government must find perfect balance between companies and investors so government can ensure longevity of company and investors?
@Psycogeek Investors are different from stockholders?
@Boris_yo Get people into facebook enough, and then try to make more and more profit as required. So either you keep adding stuff, or you start charging the people who are on it. (that was already one of the plans) A good place to start would be to start charging businesses who have a facebook presence.
@Boris_yo Sure the government should have balance :-) ya right, and the goverment shouldnt be involved in risk based investements? Couldnt it be concidered one of those . . . getting involved , whats the word?
@Psycogeek Or pay for featured user's post. Or pay for direct message to user so it does not end in folder "Mssages From Strangers".
@Psycogeek I don't know but they profit from one and another. They should do everything so one does not collide with another.
Investors is why good companies go bad after a while or feel as "not the same".
@Boris_yo if the goverment gets all tied up into the businesses and corpoations, they will no longer be able to be unbiased in law creation, and enforcements.
@Bob So 100 MB/s average for a WD Caviar Black on a SATA2 controller is OK?
Do they ever get faster? I mean the SATA2 or SATA3 WD Caviar Black hard drives?
Like, would I get above the 100 MB/s limit if I got a new SATA3 controller to match with the SATA3 hard drive?
11:50
@Psycogeek ...and turn into another shadow government.
Or is it only the SSD drives that can break through the SATA2 spec roof?
Bob
Bob
@Sammy sounds standard for a consumer HDD
@Sammy very few HDDs can exceed SATA1
the SATA3 would probably get you slightly better burst from the on-drive cache
but sustained throughput would not go any higher
@Sammy I get almost full SATA3 potential with SSD.
@Boris_yo oh right, done and done :-) why do i keep talking like it could happen some day . . . ok it could get even worse as time progresses.
@Psycogeek We already have one shadow government (SG) and we don't need another.
@Psycogeek See?
11:55
@Boris_yo dont confuse me, investors hold the stocks? dont they? at least on paper or in somones computer somewhere, if not physically .
@Bob I see the "internal" transfer speed for the WD1002FAEX is specified to 126 MB/s. Is this speed achievable? If I get a PCI-Express SATA3 controller card and install it? The motherboard has an Intel P45 chipset.
@Boris_yo lol, whhhattt?
@Psycogeek They are with them too. It's all about occult symbols but this one is easy.
@Boris_yo I dont see no SG on mine. is there a Youtube singapore or something?
@Boris_yo What SSD do you have? And what speeds do you get?
12:01
@Psycogeek I am not in Singapore. Otherwise @JourneymanGeek would see that too.
@Boris_yo it means Subscription Geek , you get that designation when you subscribe more than 50 times :-)
@Sammy Intel i330 120GB but this benchmark I did with 50MB is short and less accurate: i.imgur.com/DABEFOo.jpg
@Psycogeek Can't find anything related between YouTube and Subscription Geek...
Bob
Bob
@Sammy SATA2 is already far above that
SATA1 is above that
SATA3 would make no significant difference past burst rate (from cache)
@Boris_yo there now i got it too, its breeding youtube.com/?hl=en-GB&gl=SG
@Sammy Just benchmarked 1000MB for my SSD, here: i.imgur.com/9JMAAgn.jpg
@Psycogeek You got it or you caused it?
12:14
@Boris_yo crap now its stuck on it
@Psycogeek Try clearing cookies and cache. (About cookies now, try to sneak into the kitchen properly to clear them before grandma notices you and strikes your head with cooking utensil)
Look at my history youtube.com/watch?v=pTUtETu09oQ Watch the fist 10 seconds of this , , , then the first 10 seconds of this youtube.com/watch?v=hIlWfdVM4-8
@Psycogeek Sindrome of uncertainty?
@Boris_yo I already got cookies, funeral cookies. gotta love leftovers
@Psycogeek Funeral cookies are for undead
12:28
and for help vampires
Anybody ever tried Cool Pics PDF reader? I was thinking about putting it on instead of FoxIt?
@Psycogeek Googled for Cool Pics PDF reader and was shown nothing relevant.
mabey take a space out coolpics
12:43
@Psycogeek Nope, maybe this? pdf2exe.com/reader.html
ah hell, i probably have the virus then :-)
it was supposed to be a really good PDF reader that can even make PDfs , on the rare occasion that i would ever do so.
it was compared with 4 other "free" pdf readers.
coolPicsPDFfree.exe 28MB . which sounded small .
I tracked down the company name in the exe freewordpdfsoftware.com
@Boris_yo I htink i would rather have the 1Mb one, mabey it would be harder to fill it with things like ASk toolbars, and Candy malware and other goodies?
@Boris_yo That's really impressive. My Seagate system hard drive and WD hard drives fade in comparison, especially on the random read and write. But even on sequential, your SSD is about 2 times faster. It's up to 90 times faster on 4K and QD random.
@Boris_yo Is this on a desktop computer? What's your CPU and MB model?

« first day (1171 days earlier)      last day (4142 days later) »