« first day (1171 days earlier)      last day (4142 days later) » 

13:00
@Psycogeek You weren't warned by your antivirus?
@Sammy DELL Latitude E6420
@Boris_yo I scanned the 28mb file, says nothing bad, and has a legit looking file info in the file. its probably clean. but you know there is freeware out there that installs more benign crap that doesnt get seen by the malware program untill after the malware is installed. It comes down via one of them web install methods.
I installed this here tiny one, and it is certannly clean, didnt muck up the registry, now i shall see how it does with its first PDF.
Question: Why SSD's random reads and writes are not on par with its sequential read and write? Isn't it supposed to take zero time on SSD for both? If there are no platters to seek then SSD should have same sequential and random speeds.
@Psycogeek You mean various crapware? Were you asked to checkmark these before installing Cool Pic PDF reader? And why not extract self-extracting exe installation file to scan with antivirus?
@Boris_yo Hmm extract the extractors, never thought of that, i will have to try that sometime. depackage the re-packagers
The tiny 1meg PDF program has a staple problem.
@Psycogeek I use WinRar for this through context menu after right-clicking.
You know when you fold out the centerfold pics (not just in centerfold magazines) it is good to have 2 pages shown at a time, that little tiny pdf reader doesnt have the option to show the "facing pages"
But its so small and light and treated my computer well, I think i will keep it as the only reader. It should handle manuels and all
13:23
@Psycogeek you haven't heard of SumatraPDF reader? is less than 1MB!
@Boris_yo Thanks for sharing! I guess I'll have to upgrade to an SSD for system disk.
@Braiam ebook mobi and chm too. should i try it?
> Sumatra PDF is a free PDF, eBook (ePub, Mobi), XPS, DjVu, CHM, Comic Book (CBZ and CBR) reader for Windows.
it do that and more aparently
@Sammy Are you aware of SSD risks of data loss with no recovery?
@Psycogeek You don't have mobile device capable of reading epub, mobi?
@Boris_yo system disk = recoverable information with a new installation + mayor annoyance if lost because time lost rebuilding
13:30
@Braiam I doubt size such matters these days.
@Boris_yo it does if you can run it from a usb ;)
Bob
Bob
@Sammy An option I'm personally fond of is using a SSD as a cache for a HDD.
@Braiam In what way? USBs are huge these days.
Bob
Bob
Basically, all data is stored on the HDD and the system will automatically cache the most frequently accessed blocks to the SSD. Completely tranparent.
Very effective with 32-64GB SSDs. And you get far more total storage space for much cheaper.
@Bob So in worst case you lose OS and cache but retain data?
Bob
Bob
13:32
@Boris_yo No, if the SSD dies you jsut take it out and run with just the HDD.
If the HDD dies then you lose the data.
@Bob You are speaking of hybrids or using separate SSD and HDD?
Bob
Bob
@Boris_yo Separate.
It's similar to a hybrid, I suppose, but cheaper overall and with discrete devices.
@Boris_yo me read a book. sure like the microsoft referance manuel. I spend so much time reading stuff trying to figure out the computer, i would not touch a book. Movies :-)
Bob
Bob
Intel chipsets come with SSD caching functionality.
@Bob Does it also cache paging file? Can you move paging file to it?
Bob
Bob
13:33
@Boris_yo You misunderstand.
You don't control what is cached.
The system will automatically choose whatever is accessed the most.
@Bob OEM chipsets that are later used in motherboards of different brands?
Bob
Bob
SSD caching is often more effective than manually choosing. In fact, it's almost always more effective.
The system knows far better than you which blocks are accessed the most.
@Bob Sounds good to me but requires to have supported MB or laptop wit such MB which has place for both SSD and HDD. Since I use laptop, it's a problem.
Bob
Bob
@Boris_yo Yea, works best when you actually have the space :P
@Bob I rarely use CD drive but prefer not to mess with taking it out, sourcing good caddy that would fit drive bay and other tasks. I am sure this best works for desktop rigs.
@Bob How do I check for this on my laptop currently? What is this feature called? Intel Turbo Cache? I have AIDA Extreme hardware information and benchmarking utility.
13:42
@Braiam its a 4meg installer now. Installed clean, and has just enough features, thisll work good.
@Psycogeek Why not get Kindle with E-Ink for easier on the eyes reading?
that was/is my favorite pdf reader for windows
@Boris_yo why waste bucks when he already have what he needs?
Bob
Bob
In computing, Smart Response Technology (SRT) (pre-launch name SSD Caching) is a proprietary caching mechanism introduced in 2011 by Intel for their Z68 chipset (for the Sandy Bridge–series processors), which allows a SATA solid-state drive (SSD) to function as cache for a (conventional, magnetic) hard disk drive. SRT is managed by Intel Rapid Storage Technology software version 10.5 or later, and implemented in its device driver and the Z68 motherboard's firmware (option ROM). It is available only when the (integrated) disk controller is configured in RAID mode (but not AHCI or IDE ...
@Boris_yo e-ink wont play movies :-) they had a version of it once that would, but refreshing the screen that often took its toll on the power again.
@Braiam And what does he have? Library of books that you cannot take anywhere with you and which are heavy to hold?
13:45
@Boris_yo nope, he has digital books that only need a laptop/desktop to be read
@Psycogeek Where do you play movies? On computer?
@Braiam Because Kindle is black&white and bigger screen is required?
@Boris_yo are you being paid by Amazon?
@Braiam No, I am paying them.
@Boris_yo everywhere. On the computer, on the tv using a mediaBox thing, and portable, even play a movie on a GPS device.
13:48
Lo all. Sups coffee
Boris_yo: way more logical overhead for one
@Psycogeek For me it puts strain on my eyes and back to read books on digital screens. While I use Android tablet, my back feels relaxed but I still put eyes on strain.
If you are on the same page of a book, and you do not have to turn. Then why do you take longer to read 20 words from all over the page then to read a single page ?
Also, NAND and chips do have a select time.
NO head movement, but there is a chip power uo-ish delay
@Hennes More overhead for random reads and writes? Got it. Sure it needs time to locate fragments on NAND chips compared to sequential where it locates once and from then on, carries on.
I am not sure if that is the whole story. But it is at least part of it.
Also, for random writes there is the extra overhead if there is no empty sector. So once a SSD has exhausted its spare supply of empty cells then random writes are going to crawl
@Hennes If page has 300 words, it would take less time to read 20 words than whole page.
13:51
True
@Hennes I think you made mistake in this sentence:
3 mins ago, by Hennes
If you are on the same page of a book, and you do not have to turn. Then why do you take longer to read 20 words from all over the page then to read a single page ?
@Boris_yo So your indicating that the e-ink has no such issue? it did look more like a normal way to read text, as oppsed to the glowing screen method. But dont forget i like the Black screen :-) with the glowing text instead.
@Psycogeek Black screen with the glowing text? Okay. Not sure why to like black screen better than white screen if latter is easier on the eyes but if it is your personal preference for some reason then I guess that's your call.
@sammy: Bits to bytes is not always a ration of 1:8
@sammy 8:1 just works for most RAM. (And was 10 bits per bytes on some mainframes and non-X86 computers, so the '8' might not be always correct either)
@Boris_yo But you did not answer the question? back here you say strain on your eyes , and e-ink does not strain your eyes? I have shown other people how to have black screen with glowing text, and they not only prefer it , they wont stop using it.
13:58
@sammy: In the case of SATA you have to account not just for the data which can flow over the SATA wire (which is limited by 1.5G changes of voltage per second), but also checksums, information about just where the data should be written on disk. Tag queueus, etc etc.
@sammy: the result is that a 1.5GBit/sec SATA link maxes out near 270MB/sec.
@Psycogeek What I mean was digital screens (laptops, desktops, tablets, smartphones) strain my eyes while Kindle (which I don't have) is supposed not to. And yes, I tried black screen with white characters and it was better.
@Psycogeek I prefer bright text over dark background while reading ;)
@Boris_yo Reading in general can be somewhat of a strain, for like hours.
@sammy and Even our fastest spinning drive (15K RPM 2.5 inch enterprise SAS) drives barely reach that speed when transfering data from/to the actual disk
@Psycogeek Yes, but with digital screens I get blurred vision after 1 hour of reading.
14:01
@Boris_yo Reading a book is claimed to use as much calories as a lite jog, exercizing them brain muscles i guess. although it does nothing for my ass :-)
@Hennes 1.5Gbit/s equals to 192MB/s theoretical but here it exceeds it to 270MB/s?
Sorry, should be SATA-II and that was on ICH9/ICH10 chipsets
@Psycogeek In that case I should substitute my morning runs with morning reads.
Which performed remarkably well if you used their right ports.
RIght port as in: 3 ports on the chip. 6 Connections.
1+1+(1+1+1+1 via a sort of internal hub)
So if you connect 3 SSD and test then the speed depended on which SATA ports you used.
@Boris_yo if you have morning runs pepto bismal might help. (sorry couldnt pass that one up)
14:06
@Psycogeek You make me Google now
@Boris_yo then i would have to have it spelled correct first
Bob
Bob
@Hennes A 1.5Gbit/s link would go nowhere near 270MB/s.
@Boris_yo wait, really you don't know?
@Psycogeek Don't worry, Google does it for me.
@Braiam I don't have constipations so I don't need.
And now a word from our sponcor :-)
@Psycogeek I don't know why you assumed if I do morning runs I have these symptoms.
(Yes, I had to google what is was)
@Boris_yo me neither, but that doesn't mean that I don't know what would be useful for others in some situations ;)
urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=runs see #2 I should have known nobody from a different language set would get it.
If you people wouldn't speak English so perfectly , i wouldnt be using so many American slangs :-)
lol, I'm not a native speaker and I know where it comes from
14:13
I am just a runner (as in jogging, not the toilet kind)
Hmm, I should verify what #2 is before answering
@Psycogeek Runs - to overrun your shit before it overruns you? Okay, will know thanks.
My first thought where about running (jogging) and some kind of sugar tablets for energy. (Obviously not to loose weight but to increase your condition)
"Sorry folks, gotta run!"
"Our conference is in 5 minutes and you decided to run?!"
Bob
Bob
so, uh
@JourneymanGeek How'd you like more FP converters than you'll ever need?
"Run Forrest Gump! Run!"
"I don't want to do it now! Okay?"
Bob
Bob
14:15
o.O
since when did eBay have a shopping cart?
@Bob They had shopping cart and WishList for some time now.
Bob
Bob
might be new to the au site then
Hmm, not sure whewre I remembered the 270MB/sec from.
I thought it was from articles like this:
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek turns out we have a cree led torch already
no idea which exact chip it is
takes two CR123A batteries, which are dead :P
14:19
lol
mm...
yay, new gravatar
@Braiam: who has?
@JourneymanGeek has what?
a new gravatar?
mm... me... perhaps?
14:26
ahh
darned SE caching
Hmm, now it just poped into my head that wasnt right? Our special Open Source program. Watch out for clones of our program ?? uhh yea open source, there would be other compliations i assume ?
Those bastards they recompiled my Open Source :-)
@Hennes So is SATA3 worth having over SATA2? I guess in terms of sequential read and write yes but even with SATA1 operating system and apps will work as good because random writes and reads will be on par.
1) Nah
2) It depends
@Psycogeek Can you sue tham due to rules infringement?
14:35
The man speed gain is from random IO reads. And a SSD on SATA-II and on SATA-III will be a lot faster then any HDD
the first 1/2 second of Pure cache in sata3 is usefull
There is a deminshing return though
E.g. 100x as fast or 200x as fast does not matter too much
@Hennes But still SSD on SATA3 will be faster than SATA2.
E.g. a task takes a HDD 2 minutes. 100x as fast would be just over a minute. (1.2 seconds, or a 58.8 second gain). 200x times as fast would take 0.6 seconds (or a 59.4 second gain)
@Hennes That means average user won't feel difference?
14:37
The 58 second gain is much more notaciable than the extra 0.6 seconds
I suspect that that will not notice unless they do a lot of sequential reads/writes
e.g. copying movies etc
In which case they are rich
500GB SSD's are not cheap
@Hennes Wait. We divide 120 seconds (2 minutes) by 100 (times) and get 1.2 seconds as completion time for that task.
Yes, so 120 - 1.2 sec gain. (and whoops. I did a 60-1.2 calculation)
So I should have had 120-1.2 and 120-0.6 as gains
Metric minutes
I think the US uses metric minutes.
After all, they always use different measurements than the rest of the world. Inches, feet, pieces of eight, ...
those are very handy. dont need no rule, when you can just step it out with your feet, and know how many feet it is
14:43
Aye. Unless it rains. Do you need to use sea-feet or land-feet when it rains ?
It like measuring a horse in "hands"
for an inch all you need is a simple Inch worm
Lets see them do that in mm
To many decimals in the US measurement system.
e.g. 1 inch is 0.083 feet.
Bob
Bob
@Hennes No, it's 1/12th of a foot - they prefer fractions, not decimals :P
Then I see shit like 1/64" or 1/128" and get the urge to bash my head into the nearest wall.
Why you take 1.2 and 0.6 as gain? The gain is 120 seconds - 1.2 seconds = 118.8 seconds

So task that takes 120 seconds to finish on HDD will take 1.2 seconds to finish on SSD.
Arh. You are right and I will actually try to wake up now.
14:52
when stuff is almost 100times faster , there really isnt a need for measuring it, you just say WOW and go on.
@Bob I am noticing much faster alt-tabbing between fullscreen games and Windows desktop now with Windows 8.1
Windows 8.1 will include WDDM1.3[31] and DXGI 1.3.[32] New additions according to preliminary documentation are trim DXGI adapter memory usage, multi-plane overlays, overlapping swap chains and swap chain scaling, select backbuffer subregion for swap chain and lower-latency swap chain presentation. Driver feature additions include wireless displays (Miracast), YUV format ranges, cross-adapter resources and GPU engine enumeration capabilities.
if you haven't upgraded now, and you play 3d games, this might be an incentive for you to upgrade
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic not gonna happen
it requires all new drivers from the vendors though so make sure you have a recent GPU
Bob
Bob
Ralink wifi adapter => bsod
@Bob on 8.1? rly? wow
Bob
Bob
14:54
upgrade => uefi boot breaks
Ralink is a POS company anyway
Bob
Bob
upgrade => switchable graphics/ATI GPU can't be used (a driver update might fix that)
@allquixotic you mean they quit paging out minimised programs?
@Bob both ATI and Intel have put out brand spanking new drivers specifically to support WDDM 1.3 on Windows 8.1, so there's that. don't know if they'll fix switchable graphics too
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic eh, my options were a $10 Ralink card or $50 Intel card
14:56
@Bob What is the model of that Intel card you wanted to get?
Bob
Bob
@Boris_yo can't remember now
my basic requirements are dual band wifi, and bluetooth
@Bob if it makes you feel any better, IE is still slow even on version 11 :P
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic that doesn't affect me at all! :P
knowing my luck, FF would probably break too
and just on my machine
FF 24 works fine here, I don't think anything broke outside of IE
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic yes, well, not much was working perfectly fine when I tried
I might try again next month
after getting an additional HDD to make another backup image
14:59
IE just froze on me trying to log in to Sony Creative Software's website >_>
not even any flash on the page
Bob
Bob
my main gaming machine is my desktop anyway (Win7)
and I usually use windowed mode too
there is no way I'm going to try to upgrade the desktop
there are so many little hacks that have gone into it over the years to keep the kernel happy
maybe it's just other unrelated improvements in the AMD graphics drivers that have absolutely nothing to do with Windows 8.1, but Planetside 2 is running a LOT better now for me, shrug
Bob
Bob
when the time comes for Win7 to be retired (end of support, probably), I'll either do a clean install or ditch the machine
the GPU fan is too loud anyway, and the MB doesn't support the on-die GPU
it was a horribly thought out configuration :P
lol
mine is working fine except for the brokenness of the LucidLogix chip
and their refusal to produce updates
if they were really able to do LucidLogix just right -- if they got the hardware/software to an ideal state -- it'd essentially be free SLI on any mainstream Intel CPU with a discrete GPU in the same system
@Bob Only chipset Z68 implements Smart Response Cache. Do you know if Z68 chipset is used on laptop motherboards? Do you know of website which allows to find all motherboards that have certain chipset?
15:02
!!urban Lucid
@Psycogeek lucid To feel as thought you can express yourself with 100% clarity. Often felt by those who are under the influence of narcotics.
allowing you to buy a $300 graphics card and get the equivalent of $500 worth of GPU performance out of it
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic or crossfire in your case :P
yeah lol
Bob
Bob
though I'd expect Intel to play nicer with Nvidia than AMD
15:03
I'm actually trying to do a non LucidLogix use case of my Intel GPU right now
Bob
Bob
@Boris_yo eh, probably means Z68 and newer?
graphics output/display and 3d rendering are entirely handled by the AMD Radeon HD7970 with no interference from the Intel GPU
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic also, Haswell/Broadwell is probably a prerequisite
but the Intel GPU comes in to provide real time QuickSync Video encoding of video capture
@Bob I know they are iterating LucidLogix's hardware on the motherboards of new ASUS, etc. "8" series chipsets for Haswell. I bet the Broadwell motherboard + CPU/iGPU combo with the right LucidLogix chip and drivers will be the ideal
new Intel iGPU drivers (since about August) have been allowing you to perform GPU encoding using QSV or OpenCL even when the iGPU has no plugged in video card and isn't being used by LucidLogix
just install the driver and the API becomes available in programs that use it
What would a intel 4600gpu on-die be able to render in a sli/crossfire type mode compared to a 7950 or 7970 ? 4 lines of the frame ?
15:06
@Psycogeek what do you mean? with LucidLogix?
well for starters the HD4600 isn't the most powerful Intel iGPU there is
@Bob **SRT** **Requirements:** (Why I cannot bold this?)

Intel® Z87, Q87, H87, Z77, Q77, H77 Express Chipset-based desktop board

Mobile users can forget about SRT for now.
the Iris Pro 5200 is the most powerful Intel iGPU, and it's only available on their full-scale mobile platform (14" to 17" laptops)
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic what I'm afraid of is how much CPU power they'll sacrifice to improve the GPU
@allquixotic if it could be used as a team with a card GPU. I think it would just make stuff more prone to fail and have minimal improvement for a normal desktop with a gaming GPU card.
Bob
Bob
@Boris_yo Ghetto Chat Markdown (TM @allquixotic) doesn't work when you have multiple lines.
15:08
@Bob they're already doing that, silly! :) TomsHardware did a comparison between the percentage of the CPU die (the whole package, not just the "CPU part") dedicated to graphics processing between Sandy and Ivy, and it went from like 25% to 55%
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic o.O
I guess that won't work if you don't have the supproting hardware, though?
My P67 chipset is lacking some stuff.
@Bob what won't?
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic QuickSync
QSV is completely orthogonal to the motherboard or anything on it
QSV is simply an iGPU function of most Sandy Bridge CPUs and all Ivy Bridge or later CPUs
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic Yes, but the main barrier to me using it (so far) has been the simple issue of getting the GPU to run.
15:10
except for enthusiast (-E, -EP, -EX) series
@allquixotic And what about the way an on-die would use the memory, vrses the dedicated GPU with its seperated dedicated memory?
@Bob the latest Intel graphics drivers can initialize the Intel iGPU regardless of BIOS settings, motherboard, etc. for "headless" compute operations, meaning, DirectCompute, OpenCL and QSV, primarily.
Bob
Bob
o.O
I'm going to have to try that on my desktop.
it's similar to "DRM Render Nodes" (look it up on Phoronix) for Linux, but this is on Windows
Bob
Bob
One problem.
MediaEspresso can only do QuickSync encoding on old versions of the driver.
Like, very old.
In the sense of the one that came with my laptop is too new
In other words, I'm going to have to find an encoder that works with QS :\
15:12
@Psycogeek the on-die GPU of standard HD4000 series GPUs reserves a ~512 MB chunk of system memory (configurable on some systems), which is a lot slower than GDDR5
but Iris Pro 5200 on Haswell's mobile platform, as well as all upcoming Broadwell GPUs, have on-die GDDR (a small amount, but it's there) for the iGPU
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic which really doesn't matter if you have at least 8GB
@Bob Handbrake should work
Bob
Bob
if you're at all serious about using that computer, you should have at least 8GB
@allquixotic I'll have to try that tomorrow
> I read in PC Magazine and on the website 3D Guru that the 2600K (P67 chipset) DOES have Quick Sync capability as long as a discrete GPU is not plugged in.
wat
so... this guy is saying you can use QS as long as you have no video output at all??
@allquixotic Ok, but whatever type it would use, in a mlutitasking game where the gpu and cpu are running, and memory is accessed in Both. I would wonder how the On-die GPU using the onboard memory, would clash with the programs own use of memory. Both of them using the same resource, instead of dedicated resources.
and that's after I told the BIOS LucidLogix Virtu MVP setting the following:
!!tell 11776137 no
@Psycogeek Tell me how laggy YouTube video becomes if you right-click on it and keep it shown.
@Bob that's how it used to be
the older Intel drivers (even from earlier in 2013) would refuse to provide any on-die iGPU functionality whatsoever unless you had a monitor (display head) plugged into the iGPU and it was actively rendering your desktop
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic No, that statement is completely wrong.
They're saying you have QS if discrete is not plugged in.
But on a P67, you don't have the integrated port (or supporting hardware)
@Psycogeek well, modern memory to CPU buses are point to point, meaning there shouldn't be any bottlenecks, and every component has a clear lane reserved just for it
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic Looks like it was in the March update
and the August update did something else
wait, fuck
there goes that idea
> Now, one can use both Intel Quick Sync Video and OpenCL even when Intel® HD Graphics is not the primary display adapter. This requires Intel Graphics driver to be installed and will work only on Windows 8 platforms.
15:19
lol
i thought your desktop had Windows 8.0?
no?
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic I said Win7 above :P
@Boris_yo It balks the video only stops it for 1/2 a second, while audio continues. then it does seem that the frame rate drops some as long as the right click menu is up, hard to tell because some of the frame rates are already low.
Bob
Bob
it's currently dual-boot with 8 Preview, which is expired
actually, I could probably stick 8.1 on as dual-boot
VHD boot most likely
how many times could the MSDN DreamSpark keys be installed again?
anyway I'm going to have a blast with this
15:21
@allquixotic And 2 things accessing a really fast path at the same time, has always made the really fast path become a traffic jam too.
buying a $36 DXTory license (TotalBiscuit's preferred capture program, yay!) to provide a DirectShow video source for capturing the current running game
@Psycogeek For me it's not framerates but lags.
then using Sony Vegas to capture the DirectShow input and use QSV to encode it live to a compressed format
HDD won't be banged on very hard, and Radeon will still be dedicated to rendering the game world
theoretically i could capture video for hours and only use a few gigabytes, then crop it later and upload to youtube
@allquixotic There's Hypercam software for capturing too.
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic I'll probably capture with FRAPS and drop to the other OS to encode later :P
or just play on the other OS
15:23
i used to use FRAPS, but a half hour video would eat like 35 GB
Bob
Bob
but I'm the kind of guy that never reboots, so...
@allquixotic eh, I have like 400 GB to spare on three drives
even my 2 x 4TB 7200rpm disks on a hardware RAID controller struggles mightily under that I/O load
I have ~6 TB to spare, but I don't like writing at that intense rate for hours
Bob
Bob
hm?
those three are backup and/or scratch drives
I don't really care all that much about them :P
@allquixotic But you said the on-die GPU will be using the same CPU controller memory. It is not like the GPU on the CPU would use a different path to that memory would it?
Bob
Bob
worst case, I lose a few backups
15:24
lossless or near-lossless capture to disk is pretty extreme I/O -_- and that'd be on my primary (only!) disk array.
@allquixotic That's uncompressed video. I assume DXTory compresses as it captures?
Bob
Bob
@allquixotic ah. in my case, those drives are not part of the RAID array
@Boris_yo no, DXTory provides uncompressed video in either RGB or YUV formats, to Sony Vegas, which then does the encoding
DXTory can also capture and encode itself, but it only comes with one bad compression codec that doesn't support QSV (or any GPU encoding), and otherwise you need to use a third party VfW codec.
Capturing and encoding in parallel would be possible with today's multi-core processors?
if i could find a free or very cheap VfW codec to encode to H.264 using QSV, I would buy that in a heartbeat
but I don't know where to find it... so, Sony Vegas it is :/
15:26
god... I hate my the ISP provided and can't be changed router...
Bob
Bob
o.O
Where can I find a VfW codec that uses QSV? don't even care about the media format at the moment
@allquixotic Is this what you need? free-codecs.com/download/x264_VfW.htm
Bob
Bob
> Fixed minor artifacts seen in the following games and benchmarks:
Cut the Rope
wat
O_O
I wonder if (@slhck halp?!) I could use ffmpeg to capture from a dshow video source and do QSV or OpenCL encoding
I read recently that ffmpeg is starting to do GPU video encoding, but maybe it's still buggy/experimental
Bob
Bob
15:30
@allquixotic that edit cleared a lot up :P
@Boris_yo define lag? i tested , because the video stops and audio keeps going, if the lip sync gets off, and here it does not seem to do that.
@allquixotic Ever heard of Bandicam? bandicam.com/downloads
@Psycogeek Video and audio are in sync but it's video that performs like slideshow.
@Boris_yo ok well i think i can see it does get a slower or skipped frame rate, when the right click menu is up.
@Psycogeek You CPU and GPU are...?
@Boris_yo 4700k and the 7950
on this computer, i can test on the other one .
15:36
@Psycogeek And you experience what I do but in less degree?
@Boris_yo correct
@Psycogeek Probably thing of YouTube optimization and power of hardware.
@Boris_yo just it fudging up when the right click goes off, is a reason somebody should have noticed it, or to ask them to kindly look into it. there is no reason it has to be that way?
I read that h-262 codec is better than DivX in terms of filesize and video clarity but requires more powerful hardware.
@Psycogeek Common sense tells me not... Nothing is supposed to lag on powerful hardware, right?
@Boris_yo common sence tells me they dont care :-) right click is for changing stuff, so they probably dont bother with that trivia.
15:40
@Psycogeek 4700k does not appear on ARK Intel.
@Boris_yo would you believe 4770 ? i donno its a freaking fast intel chip thing :-)
@Psycogeek We haven't discussed adobe flash YouTube videos use. Maybe it poses problem?
OMG, I reviewed 4 post in a row in SO :O
@Boris_yo Mabey there is an alternative flash program out? Other than HTML5 ?
@Psycogeek gnash?
15:43
@Braiam i donno? do you use an alternative?
only for really old flash animations
Gnash "One problem for the project is the difficulty of finding developers. The current developers have never installed Adobe's Flash player, because they fear that anyone who has ever installed the Adobe Flash Player has at the same time accepted an agreement not to modify or reverse engineer Flash player. Therefore, the Gnash project has only about 6 active developers." Thats funny, they could always use the presidends excuse "I forgot"
What I do to save money on new video game and hardware upgrade:
1. Fire up YouTube and search for Let's Play [video game name] in highest definition
2. Grab gamepad
3. Enjoy as if it would I play that game
o----key....
15:49
@Bob akk link thanks. That one is a Html5 ? I need one for my older browser thing , because IE10 seems to be working "ok" for the html5 part.
Bob
Bob
@Psycogeek Shumway is a Firefox extension.
It's specifically to emulate Flash in HTML5
still experimental
@Bob so firefox doesnt have flash play all in it yet like IE10 seems to? I dont even know how IE10 does it ?
Bob
Bob
@Psycogeek I believe IE10 and GC both ship with their own versions of Flash (based on or developed by Adobe, I believe).
Firefox uses the NPAPI plugin provided by Adobe, which is installed separately.
Kinds surprised that it had flash, But funny it didnt trigger up a silverlight :-)
Guess MS isnt ever going to get that off the ground
@Boris_yo Uhh and what pretend your pushing the buttons? I dont think it would pass, because i wouldnt be Dying constantaly
@Psycogeek I don't know what centrefold is. Somekind of folded poster in journal?

« first day (1171 days earlier)      last day (4142 days later) »