« first day (1084 days earlier)      last day (4229 days later) » 

12:00
on these boxes here there really isnt a sticker for that, it is only on the drive itself. they are Goflex type chunks
Its one of those "think before you pick up the screwdriver" things
@JourneymanGeek What i am saying is. i pull the raw drive OUT, they dont know what it was in.
and the warrenty (at least 2 times) was based on the raw drives Date, not my reciept for a external box.
ahh
I guess
assuming its a drive a enclosure too ;p
WD 2.5 inch drivers have the USB controller built in too
and heck none of them will send you a NEW drive, they send ya another one that sombody else sent in, and they tested and found it to be 100%
yup
familar with it
I had one of the 7200.11s
12:04
so i have never concidered that they . . . gave a chit :-)
they had bad firmware so my guess is they just got the broken ones, flashed the new firmware, wiped and sent them out
@JourneymanGeek i wonder also if they might be tossing new controller boards on (for those situations) and sending them back too
reset the smart data, so no reallocated secors show up , and its all set :-)
so returning a drive under warrenty is a 2 step process. to them and back, then off to e-bay :-)
lol
I think I had a refurb drive last ~3 years before dying
 
1 hour later…
13:29
Windows SDK is huge :O
13:48
ugh
my dad got one of these.
Should have gotten a copy for shits and giggles before baleeting it ;)
Curiosity kills the cat, and the dog, and even the top of the food chain :-)
One of my users , knows like 100 times over, to execute all attachments with the big axe. But nooo, there they go again , DUHHH , i just gotta see, this looks . . . . I will KEEL you!
I got my users trained well
I had the thing shut down before, no exes, no Zips could even open. in outlook express, i forget how to do that. but i better get on it.
Ohh lookie, a "secure message" it must be from my lawyer. Ya he is going to sue you for being STUPID
gee what gave you that clue A) it was in your spam e-mail, not your secure E-mail B) it was from somebody you dont even know C) it has an attachment D)umass
I will send this to them veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/trojanhorse_a.jpg set it up as wallpaper
14:11
@Psycogeek That was malware email you got claiming to be from lawyer?
@Boris_yo look at Journeyman Geeks link up there. fresh new fun
@JourneymanGeek You have users that you help with PC?
It takes me 3 seconds to identify malware email without opening it.
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek time for some more food dye!
I have here: one sealable test tube, one bottle each of blue, red, black and rosewater, one new smiggle pen and one new converter
@Boris_yo but if you delete it , you will never know what is in it . somehow trojans and viruses never have that "lets look in the box marked live snakes" appeal to me.
Bob
Bob
let's try... mauve. it's on the back of the food dye bottle. 1/3 red, 2/3 blue.
14:26
Is it possible to setup raid without data loss?
Bob
Bob
@William'MindWorX'Mariager what do you mean?
do you want to set up raid with existign data?
I'm trying to add a disk to my Lacie 5big without having to reformat the existing disks.
Bob
Bob
ah. you want to expand the size?
... Is that clippy?!
2
Bob
Bob
XD
14:28
@Bob Yeah, expand the size.
Bob
Bob
hm
My selection is Raid0 and Raid5. I don't need the extra safety so I just need Raid0
Bob
Bob
I'm not sure if it's possible, but I'd certainly not recommend doing so without backup.
I don't think RAID0 can be expanded without a full rebuild.
Thing is, I don't have spare disks to store the data temporarily. :P
Bob
Bob
Actually, RAID1 might be the only type that can be expanded
@William'MindWorX'Mariager Consider that in RAID0, 1/N of your data is on each disk, in alternating stripes. RAID5 is more complex, but it also distributes the data.
How do you expect to add a new disk? You'd have to redistribute all existing data.
Bob
Bob
some controller somewhere might implement that
I just figured the raid controller might've been able to do that. So add the extra disk and then it'll fix the data.
Bob
Bob
Not sure about the LaCie
@Boris_yo naw, those are phone calls. I try to see how long I can fuck with them before they hang up
Bob
Bob
@William'MindWorX'Mariager Might be better to contact the controller manufacturer.
They'd have a better idea.
> In cases where a hard drive has failed or you wish to expand storage capacity, data will be lost when replacing/swapping hard disks.
Though, not sure about adding disks...
14:35
Well the guide is telling me all data will be lost.
Bob
Bob
Hm.
@William'MindWorX'Mariager You may be in luck!
manuals.lacie.com/en/manuals/2big-5big-nas/dashboard/raid5big, see the Expand your RAID array Hard Disk Capacity section, specifically the Manual part (click the link)
@William'MindWorX'Mariager: backup and try it? ;p
Bob
Bob
> For instructions on how to expand your protected RAID array once you have added a new hard disk to an available or empty drive slot, please see RAID Setup Wizard. Select the Manual+Spare link and you will have the option to use the new disk as a Spare or to add the storage to the array. Please make certain to select the radio button for your RAID array under the heading Without data loss (Step 6).
@JourneymanGeek He likes to live dangerously :P
I have a lovely shade of mauve here :D
eh which reminds me, I need to do a disk migration on the shared box
@Bob: mauve and lovely, same sentance? ;p
Bob
Bob
lol
holy shit that rosewater has a strong smell
not too sure about adding that...
(also, rather ironic that I'm doing this with a smiggle pen. living up to their floweriness! :P)
14:40
@Bob, From the manual, it seems only the new harddisk that's added gets formatted.
Which is fine by me.
Please note that data stored on the new disk will be deleted.
I'll give it a try with the first disk and see if the test data is removed.
Bob
Bob
good luck
@Bob: add sparingly? ;p
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek 20 drops added to 3ml of red-blue ink :P
about 60 drops per mL
going to eyedropper this converter (the test tube is too narrow and deep for the pen)
eyedropper or syringe? ;p
or pippette?
I've done it with carts, works pretty well
Bob
Bob
14:48
@JourneymanGeek syringe
pipettes havne't arrived yet
I find the converter works better in the pen
brand new pen :P
I wish I had some kind of bonding agent
smiggle? ;p
hmm
XD
Bob
Bob
ya
The daiso at ion has like...
4-5 different types of super glue ;p
Bob
Bob
...
I mean, to bond the ink to the paper.
Not to the pen.
Bob
Bob
14:50
XD
What is it you're doing Bob?
@William'MindWorX'Mariager i would say dont do it. every method they have to slop raid together, and patch a chunk on the side , and expand this and that, add levels of unnessisary complexity, that only ever end in severe trajedy :-)
Never heard of that
@William'MindWorX'Mariager: I sort of got him hooked on fountain pens
and he's involved in some mad, inky, science.
Bob
Bob
@William'MindWorX'Mariager experimenting with food dye as cheap fountain pen ink in cheap fountain pens
@Psycogeek Seems like a bit of a hassle though that I can't do it. It's a 5 disk raid system that supports up to 15TB when filled with 5x3TB disks. Right now I only have a couple of TB but imagine having to backup 12TB to add the final 3TB disk.
And expand option of some kinda would be nice.
Anyhow, it seems if I go with Raid1 I should be able to expand. It'll synchronize the disks after adding a larger disk to the raid.
14:56
@William'MindWorX'Mariager well something can go wrong with anything. I just read about so many collapsing raid systems where the disk is blamed as failing, and i dont think the disks themselves fail that often. unless they got a 200Lb dog scratching his butt on thier box
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek successful fil
turns out you are supposed to flood the feed area
Bob
Bob
gives me almost an extra converter's worth of space :P
did I say yoy weren't? ;p
Bob
Bob
14:58
converter holds about half a mL
well, using the converter 'normally' would do that
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek ya
@William'MindWorX'Mariager My friend had a drobo, best thing in the world (cough cough) he configures it up weird, as if that is even possible on that. a few years later, he has replaced 6 of the disks, and there are only 4 IN the thing. (once he changed 2, he had a mismatch issue)
Bob
Bob
the irony
half the smiggle pens and pencils (and erasers) are scented
now i have scented FP ink in here
14:59
lol
Bob
Bob
though it smells pretty crap
Bob
Bob
hm. not bad at all
@Psycogeek Ouch. :|
Bob
Bob
might add a dab of black
15:00
Right now I just have a few spare disks lying around I'm adding. But I'm planning on adding LaCie's own 3TB disks to be sure it all works as it should.
Bob
Bob
oh yea
blue stains human skin
apparently red stains plastic
@William'MindWorX'Mariager At the same time i have had locked down, teamed up Raid0 (the most insecure) 4 wide in 2 computers and no error (yet)
Bob
Bob
that pen (and converter) might be permanently stained from this :P
stain all the things!
Bob
Bob
@Psycogeek hope you have good backups
15:01
This was a cheap converter I hope?
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek rather ironic that black is the only major non-stainer :P
@JourneymanGeek ya. all of 40c
Yeah I've used Raid0 on my previous computer for years without any problems. :)
Bob
Bob
hey, it works well enough
I'd use one in the Lamy if it fit
@Bob i have been doing raid0 for 20 years, havent had a real problem, but i do have non-raid backups.
but again, i dont do crasy stuff
@Bob: yeah
I haven't tried one of my standard carts in the lamy yet >_>
Bob
Bob
15:04
@Psycogeek RAID0 across four disks is crazy
@Bob its teams of 2, 4 times i splained it before to you?
Bob
Bob
@Psycogeek ah, sorry
must've slipped my mind
seperate controllers, so from to copying is as fast as poissible, channel seperated so teams are on seperate controllers.
@Psycogeek don't need to know what is in malicious email. Title and subject line alone tell me everything I need to know.
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek
15:07
eh
thats not half bad
not mauve tho
lol
My hello kitty shampoo bottles are AWESOME for ink storage
right until my niece sees em
Bob
Bob
@JourneymanGeek well, according to the instructions on the FD bottles :P
@Bob first one that looks really good, or your penmanship is improved
Bob
Bob
I'm more than slightly colourblind :P
well, I can see different colours. I absolutely suck at linking vision to colour names, though
@Psycogeek My penmanship sucks.
@Bob: mauve appears to be a sort of grey pink. This seems closer to dark grey blue
Bob
Bob
lol
15:09
I have a good bull sheet detector.
Bob
Bob
funny thing is, the red DD recomments 2drops blue, 1drop red
Mauve (from the French form of Malva "mallow") is a pale lavender-lilac color, one of many in the range of purples. Mauve is named after the mallow flower. Another name for the color is mallow with the first recorded use of mallow as a color name in English in 1611. Mauve is more grey and more blue than a pale tint of magenta would be. Many pale wildflowers called "blue" are actually mauve. Sometimes mauve can be considered a purplish pink or a pale purple. Mauve can also be described as pale violet. Mauveine, the first aniline dye Mauve was first named in 1856. Chemist Sir Willia...
Bob
Bob
the blue one recommends 2drops blue, 1drop pink
I didn't buy the pink food dye
I suspect reversing the colours makes sense
Bob
Bob
Yea. The FPN post with the same dyes used the reversed ratio for mauve.
15:11
and is it just me or is the paper kinda blue tinted around where you wrote?
Bob
Bob
that one
@JourneymanGeek it is?
I can't tell on the paper itself.
Don't have anything to magnify with, though.
@William'MindWorX'Mariager uhm. RAID expansion usually takes ages. Making a backup (assuming you have the space, but you do want a backup anyway in case things go wrong) might be a dozen times faster.
Bob
Bob
Still, it's a nice colour :P
Mauve? That is the colour of danger! (Well, except to Earthlings who use red)
looks it to me
least on the photo
Bob
Bob
15:14
@JourneymanGeek yea, I can see a slight bit of blue around the purple (is that the right name? :P)
lets say the bottom colour ;p
Bob
Bob
lol
I'd call it a very dark blue
Bob
Bob
definitely a purplish tinge on the paper. I think.
@Hennes Why would resilvering a RAID array be slower than backing up the data, and then rewriting it? That's what you're doing in the first place.
Bob
Bob
15:16
@DarthAndroid cause raid rebuilding sucks
Because you are moving and recalculating a lot.
Bob
Bob
(also, thrashing? maybe.)
@Bob @Hennes You're moving and recalculating just as much to copy it off and copy it back, though.
Say you have a 3 disk RAID 5. With 3 sectors writting
Disk 1 A C
Disk 2 A B
Disk 3 C B
If you add a fourth disk it should move to this:
Bob
Bob
@DarthAndroid RAID rebuilding till sucks
I would know.
15:17
Alex Miller on July 25, 2013

Welcome to Stack Exchange podcast #50, featuring usual suspects Joel Spolsky, Jay Hanlon, and David Fullerton, plus special guest Shog9 aka Nine Shogs Shogging.  And remember, today’s podcast is sponsored by the House of Lords, bringing you excellent laws, 100% free!

This is podcast #50… sort of. It’s the 50th podcast since we switched from the Stack Overflow podcast to the Stack Exchange podcast, but we’ll celebrate anyway.

Our most recent blog post had an instruction in the title, and 80 people bothered to do so. Apparently, our blog post titles have power. We probably promise only to use it for good. …

It's still faster, because the disks don't thrash
Disk 1 A
Disk 2 A B
Disk 3 C B
Disk 4 C
They can rebuild as large sequential data streams
@Bob amen to that , 2 days to do a rebuild with a raid5, And i have heard of people having that occur 2-3 times a Year.
Bob
Bob
@DarthAndroid you'd need either a very large buffer or.. ya.
15:19
@Bob You'd need N * sectorsize memory
for for a 4-disk array with 512Kb sectors, you'd need 2MB
When RAID 5 fails you just make sure you do an incremental backup since yesterday incremental/full. Then at 5PM replace the disk, wipe and recreate the array and restore from backup.
Bob
Bob
that's not "large" data streams
No, that's minimum required.
It's still going to be slower to copy the data off and copy it back, though.
Practical experience with RAID5 rebuilding:
1) SLOW
2) Stresses the remaining disks
3) Nobody seems to present an 'undo/cancel' option, or a decent estimate of time before it starts
And I've had practical experience with both rebuilding and relocating an 8TB RAID5
Bob
Bob
15:21
@DarthAndroid remember, when you copy it off and on you can do it in clean operations
when you try adding a new disk, you have to move data around on the same disks
that causes thrashing
nods.
IN my example, data 'C'
But on a full RAID5 array that would be a lot more then just one 'letter'
Perhaps, but memory can easily mitigate that.
Bob
Bob
and we go back to buffer sizes.
with enough memory, you're effectively copying all that data off and on again... just using that memory as the temporary location, instead of more disks
oh, memory can help. But you still do read and writes to the ame disk. A lot of them. That is never going to be fast on spinning disks
Bob
Bob
with all the shuffling, very little (if any) data will stay in the same location
15:25
@Hennes Seeking the head every 10s or so isn't going to cause major thrashing.
Backups are better than duplicate info on 2 disks, if something goes wrong with the data, it is wrong twice. that kind of redundancy only works for drive failures.
@Bob Copying off+back on nothing will stay in the same location
Bob
Bob
@DarthAndroid are you really nitpicking that?
seriously?
that's far too pedantic, even for me.
No, not if it is every 10 seconds. but 10 second of data is about 4GiB? That is a large buffer which might not get used.
If you SYnc to backups, and the data was horribly different on the compare cycle, you can stop from destroying your backup
15:26
(4GB as an estimate based on the read speed I get from four elder 1Tb SATA drives)
Bob
Bob
also, last I checked, (semi-)random reads are much slower than sequential. if you're skipping blocks, that's not really sequential. it you're not skipping blocks, you're moving all the data anyway.
nods at bon.
@Hennes (4GB is about right)
And Sorry, my intention wasn't to be pendantic, but your earlier comment made it seem like copying off+backon would not be shuffling the data.
(Otherwise, I didn't see the point of the comment)
Psycogee: RAIDs goal is usaully just to keep the server up and running till repairs can be done. Exception: Striping (e.g. on a gaming desktop) or IOps (and then you should use an SSD, fusion IO cards or similar)
Bob
Bob
NCQ might mitigate that to a certain extent. I'm not sure how much.
15:28
hey guys.
Hi Studio
@Psycogeek Yeah, backups are offsite and don't rely on raid at all :) Raid is just for high-availability and the hope that I might not have to use backups.
hey @OliverSalzburg - contgrats on the modship anniversary! :D
OOooh, we have a new mod?
@Hennes yup, servers perfect for raid1 , but were at superuser :-)
Bob
Bob
15:30
where memory might be faster is if you're effectively using them in the same way you'd use extra disks, if your external disks happen to be slower than the array :P
@DarthAndroid no, @OliverSalzburg has been a mod for 365 days
@studiohack ;) That's the joke :P
@DarthAndroid sorry, missed it then. :P
Bob
Bob
@DarthAndroid I really need to get some form of offsite backup going :(
@studiohack Eh, chat doesn't carry my teasing tone quite as well.
@Bob I highly recommend CrashPlan
15:31
@DarthAndroid too bad. I love to tease haha
Bob
Bob
I have literally >5 TB of data
on a 1Mbps upstream
@Bob oh wow
ALL my data doesn't add up to close 1 TB yet. Not even 500 GB yet. and already a pain to manage.
Bob
Bob
miscounted a bit. whoops.
@Bob CrashPlan doesn't care. I'm about to push 5TB over a 5Mbps line, and my parents' computers just finished pushing ~1TB up over a 3Mbps line
Unlimited space, and I can roll everything back in 15 minute increments for the past month.
Bob
Bob
@DarthAndroid but i care
I believe I calculated ten years upload time, at one point...
15:32
@Bob Best get started then!
Bob
Bob
1Mbps is my theoretical max
achievable max is somewhat lower
And it'll actually be slightly better with their compression + datadedup
Bob
Bob
lower still if I want usable internet in that time
May I suggest a truck full of tapes?
Bob
Bob
Ah, two years. Still pretty crap.
@Hennes Considered their HDD mail service.
Rejected it.
15:33
Or slightly more practical, copy all data to an external drive. Walk to a freinds house and upload at 100 or 1000mbit
Bob
Bob
@Hennes Heh. If only.
don't forget data caps
/me is sad. I no longer have unlimited GB traffic to my server.
Bob
Bob
I haven to heard of 100Mbit here without caps
@Bob Most of my 5TB is easily re-ripped media though, so I had CrashPlan only back up actual data first, and only once that was done did I tell it to back up /data/media
Oh, eben get 100/100 unlimited at home. Not that rare in NL
15:35
I can't wait for 1Gbps/1Gbps uncapped here
Bob
Bob
@DarthAndroid yea, most of my data isn't backed up at all
Densily populated country -> lots of competition -> good networks.
Bob
Bob
most is only mildly annoying to lose
important data is backed up (incremental daily, new per week). might go buy an external hdd, back up monthly, and leave with a friend
Do your parents use a computer?
Bob
Bob
me?
15:36
I trade backups disks with mine. Their backup and my place. My backup at their place
Bob
Bob
ahh
hrm.
My parent's are configured to back up to CrashPlan's cloud and my data server with 15-minute incrementals.
I just back up to CrashPlan's cloud since I can pull down data fast enough if something terrible happens that I require off-site restores.
@Hennes uhh how do i use a SSD for 12 terrabytes. And why do people herass about Raid0, then recommend SSD? SSd is mega raid0, all them flash chunks are not fast, they are tied together with a raid controller in there?
lol
lots of SSDS!
@Psycogeek SSD as a cache for 12TB
15:43
@DarthAndroid but they showed only a ~25% increase in speed with the intel cache system right? uhh but my raid0 is 76% faster than the raw disk they compared to?
@Psycogeek Not sure, but based on my personal tests, 32GB of cache can hold 97.5% of all disk requests that my system makes to the HDD in a 5-day period
Bob
Bob
yup
SSD caches are very efficient
64GB of cache is plenty to accelerate anything I do often.
Bob
Bob
I'll say it again: the computer knows far better than you which files are accessed most.
and caches are only usefull if its the same stuff over and again which would be the system, not the media?
15:46
@Psycogeek Yup! But I don't need media to be fast. Playback is slow.
unless people are watching star wars 15 times in a row :-)
Bob
Bob
The pitfalls with SSD caches are when you need heavy writing or just high throughput in general.
It's awesome, because it knows to cache EXCEL.exe, but not Excel.hlp, etc.
Bob
Bob
But fast random access (that's done often)? They do pretty well there.
@DarthAndroid But if you have to transfer and organise it, its some of the slowest
Bob
Bob
15:47
@DarthAndroid I imagine it could even cache only specific blocks of larger files...
@Psycogeek This is why my media sits on a RAID array that operates in excess of 400MB/s
@Bob That's what I like about OSX's fusion drive and Intel's RST. They operate on block level
And ZFS's L2ARC
If you don't have an Intel setup, look at FancyCache
for IOps I recommend SSD. No moving parts. That they so something similar to RAID over flash chips is inconsequential. Just that they allow massive IOps
though sadly that's not persistent through reboots.
@DarthAndroid ZFS! ARC! :)
ZFS is amazing, just wish rollbacks were non-destructive.
15:49
@DarthAndroid Re excel. Sometimes it knows even less. E.g the seagate hybrid cache a sector. It does not know which program or what data it belongs to. Just that is asked for a lot.
@Hennes That's how the intel RST works I believe. Doesn't care what it's used for.
SSD is perfect for lapdrop computers
I just bough a big SSD (Intel postville G2 76GiB) and put everything except movies and games on it.
@Psycogeek I think you mis-- Oh. ah. I see what you did there.
@DarthAndroid lol
hows this: 5 myths about SSD 1) SSD is not digital, it is analog. MLC memory the gates are partly charged, and interpreted. because its art not science, they only could figure to have 4 charge levels and interpret about what the level of charge is.
Only SLC memory cells are fully on fully off type
2) SSD is not randomly accessed, unless it is made up of ram, Flash chips are block accessed
3) SSD do slow down as they get fuller, just because they have to start clearing pages, they speedily ignore like the laundry you didnt get done , garbage collection and whatever.
4) SSDs have a very low failure rate, only 2X hard drives
5) the operations of the controller chip and flash modules are so fast . . . It still has to have DRAM as a cache
Course the only one that bugs me, is when they crack them open and all they are is Dropped into a aluminum case, When the bloodly hot controller chip that seems to be part of lots of the fails, could have been heat synced to the case. instead it s just slopped together
16:18
@Psycogeek 1) As long as it still has discrete states, it's still digital.
2) Not sure what you're saying here. Usually when people talk about SSDs and random access, it's that SSDs generally don't have much of a penalty for random access, compared to HHDs
@DarthAndroid and seek time, its just not classed as random accessed
If the states were "discrete" like your saying, they could have 128 of them.
5) is wrong. Some SSD controllers use DRAM, usually to hold lookup tables. Not as cache
@Hennes its right there in the wiki. and in a lot of the specs ""The PCB also contains a Hynix 64MB DRAM cache along with six transistors that provide for Intel’s ‘power safe write cache’""
Where? Intel SLC SSD ? 2-3 yrs old ?
16:31
If i find it in a samsung from 2012 you be happy? Of course, the NAND dies aren't the only memory chips onboard the 840 Series. The drive features DRAM cache memory used primarily to store lookup tables. This low-power DDR2 cache also serves as a landing pad for some incoming host writes. The 120GB model has a 256MB cache, while the higher-capacity flavors sport 512MB.
@CanadianLuke I love the way ms deals with it
IE 11 is not bad tbh
user image
3
@CanadianLuke So why Internet Explorer does anti-campaign on itself?
@Boris_yo Watch the video completely ;p
Bob
Bob
@Gowtham broken => working
huh?
@JourneymanGeek whoops forgot to link it
16:48
@Bob food dye ?
Bob
Bob
@Gowtham fountain pen
@JourneymanGeek my mass of nib tweaks seem to have made the blue one wider and flow better, but scratch on the paper a bit more
Ah, didn't know food dyes were sold as liquid eatingitreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/…
Bob
Bob
funnily enough, I'm using the exact same brand and bottles
@JourneymanGeek the yellow would actually go quite well with one of those preppy highlighters
@Bob coluors are awesome, the ones in cartridges(pelikan/schneider) are not vivid enough
Bob
Bob
> The scan doesn't show it very well, but the mauve mix is actually very, very dark purple (not black) and the red+blue mix really is a blue-black.
Hrm.
@Gowtham unfortunately, it washes off easily
unsure about UV fade
16:55
@Bob :(
Bob
Bob
considering mixing in some Noodler's Bulletproof if I can get my hands on some
would add some permanence
hmm avast uses quite a lot of cpu
@Gowtham How many cores?

« first day (1084 days earlier)      last day (4229 days later) »