« first day (2376 days earlier)      last day (2647 days later) » 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

11:01 PM
@noitsbecky no; lxc stop cavil
@Bob true but I want to show them how it's possible to run a new binary on an old system
currently stymied by a segfault after successfully loading every dynamic library from the current dir (from 16.04) on a centos 6 container... I'm worried I might be wrong but it could be hack-around-able
when in doubt go for the hackaround
 
@allquixotic Why would you do such a cruel thing :-((
 
Bob
@allquixotic is nested lxd a thing? :P
 
11:16 PM
ya
 
Bob
nice
 
it's been buggy but recent releases it should be basically perfect, or at least no more broken than non-nested lxd
 
Bob
I still need to set it up sometime :P
@allquixotic does it 'just work'?
 
they also added a bespoke container network management API
 
Bob
or do you have to turn on some nested virt option?
I suppose they share a kernel anyway...
 
11:18 PM
@Bob with modernish ubuntu container guest images, yeah, but with containers it often matters what the guest is doing
no hypervisor or hw virt or anything like that (although you could in theory pass kvm into a container; eww)
it just won't work if you don't use a modern host and guest so you don't accidentally lose critical permissions for nesting along the way
 
Bob
@allquixotic my ideal world is where I can keep running Debian as the main host, and chuck (Debian|Ubuntu|Fedora|.*) in containers :P
 
@Bob yeah... I'm mostly a Ubuntu 16.04 on Ubuntu 16.04 shop as far as my LXD config right now, but CentOS 6 is working well
I've even got heterogeneous network topology going: most every container gets a macvlan pipe to have a public IP, but CentOS gets a NAT'ed pipe and no public IP of its own
 
Bob
@allquixotic I've pretty much put server changes on hold until I can get the AU one up
Then I'll probably migrate most things (lower latency) and consider ditching the US/CA one.
 
I'm locked in for a year to a SP-128-S in Canada but might move to New York OVH if they ever open that DC by next year
 
Bob
@allquixotic Yea... the AU one opened for preorders last year with a promise of Oct (Nov?) delivery, but it's been delayed. They're supposedly still trying to get DDoS protection up, and they really want that first because of the recent bigger attacks.
But I'm not cancelling the order just yet, because I honestly want them here.
 
11:23 PM
preorders for NYC aren't even open
 
Bob
Some local providers have tried to match their offer. I bet prices will go right back up if OVH pulls out.
And, heck. I'm not exactly desperate to get ~$100 back from cancelling the order when I've already set it aside for monthly payments...
 
@Bob are they competitive with OVH in Canada, after currency conversion?
 
Bob
@allquixotic Lowest tier is similarly priced to Canada, but worse specs.
 
lol
 
Bob
32 GB RAM
oh, minus 20% VAT from the page btw
 
11:24 PM
@Bob So apparently, in Australia, RAM is more expensive /sarc
 
Bob
And bandwidth is not unlimited, but that's the norm here.
E3-1245v5
Can't remember what the SP-64S had
Oh, SP-32 has a E3 1231v3
So the AU one is better than that at least...
but yea SP-64 is an E5
 
well my current box is a low-end Ivy (low clock), so if my guild starts barking for me to set up a dedicated server for some CPU-intensive game, I'll just start a gofundme or something and give them a bill and say "pay up or it isn't happening"
definitely no minecraft
 
Bob
@allquixotic If it's not 24/7, maybe host on AWS?
 
@Bob VM network latency
actually an SP-32 (hopefully in New York soon) would do fine for gaming... just need a dedicated modern CPU
 
Bob
@allquixotic Does it practically matter that much?
 
11:29 PM
don't need storage, don't need much bandwidth, just need low latency bare metal CPU
@Bob for FPSes? oh yes, most definitely
adds 5-10ms
every msec counts
 
Bob
@allquixotic That much? o.O
 
@Bob well... the hideously expensive AWS "dedicated" instances, no, because you're not sharing a box with other tenants
but other tenants can give you some pretty bad latency headaches on shared boxes
they claim they don't, but they do
 
Bob
@allquixotic the AU one apparently achieves similar benchmark scores cpubenchmark.net/…
smaller cache, etc., though
and much lower TDP
then again, it's v3 vs v5
@allquixotic for FPSes you might actually be better off just renting slots off a gaming host
@allquixotic ehhh.
 
@Bob $40/month for like 8 people, with extremely RAM-constrained instances on CPU-pegged boxes? yeah, no thanks
 
Bob
<== plays CS:GO with latency varying from 30ms RTT to 70ms RTT
 
11:33 PM
gaming "hosts" are ridiculously overpriced... one of the worst values out there
 
Bob
and let's not speak of Melbourne Insurgency servers at 70-100ms RTT
@allquixotic ok... now that's not right :P
your basic CS:GO server runs at something like $1/slot/month (though that's probably one of the less-demanding servers)
of course, this wouldn't be a particularly flexible choice *shrug*
 
11:52 PM
that's it, I have had enough internet for today
 
._.
@tereško dude, NSFS warning! ;p
@Bob heh. BL2 slows down in open areas. Had to turn view distance from very far to far.
Other than that...
 
NSF*
2
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek I wonder if I'll cope any better with that :P
 
@Bob I didn't run into major issues before thousand cuts
and maybe overlook
 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

« first day (2376 days earlier)      last day (2647 days later) »