@AdrianMole they seem legit, at least from a gpt standpoint. they're going back and significantly revising the code in their answers stackoverflow.com/posts/79331450/revisions
though I find that "Thanks again for all your help, amazing that you do this on a volunteering base. Regards, Maarten", especially when their account name is "Theo" is a bit weird
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
Only spam if unsolicited OR undisclosed affiliation. If that library accomplishes a task asked about in the question AND (the user is not affiliated OR the user disclosed their affiliation) THEN not spam.
@Cow Therefore I do not believe that answer is necessarily spam.
@SmokeDetector I updated my feedback based on the guidance: "answers are NAA, unless a translation indicates the post contains text which would be considered TP (i.e., if it’s spam or R/A, the correct feedback is k)."
@ipodtouch0218 I think so, though I don't have my head wrapped around it; one last breadcrumb is the tooltip on that "reason": "This looks for particular patterns of non-English / non-human text such as hashes. See also meta.stackexchange.com/questions/332475/…;
