@Cow That pattern may be a North American number. If it is, please use a format which starts with an optional 1 followed by possible separator text and has the main number in the format 995-865-9377 where - could be a single alpha character or any [\W_]*+. Alternately, you can add the comment (?#IS NorAm) to the end of the pattern to force also using the alternate normalized form, or (?#NO NorAm) if it's not a North American phone number and it's incorrectly recognized as one. Perhaps try !!/blacklist-number 995-865-9377. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@JeffSchaller That pattern may be a North American number. If it is, please use a format which starts with an optional 1 followed by possible separator text and has the main number in the format 740-487-6271 where - could be a single alpha character or any [\W_]*+. Alternately, you can add the comment (?#IS NorAm) to the end of the pattern to force also using the alternate normalized form, or (?#NO NorAm) if it's not a North American phone number and it's incorrectly recognized as one. Perhaps try !!/blacklist-number 740-487-6271. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Makyen Is it possible or does it makes sense to have multiple numbers, for instance, 3 of the same blacklisted numbers in a spam, to count/increase the weight further in order to potentially have it auto flagged?
@Cow I've considered it, from time to time. It might be reasonable to have a detection reason along those lines, but it hasn't been implemented. What, exactly, it would detect is something I haven't decided upon.
@Cow In order for a "number" to make an exact match, the pattern must begin with a digit or up to two of +,(,[, or { immediately followed by a digit. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
