The process of "triage" is well defined in Emergency Medicine. It's the process of determining how many resources a patient might need while being treated.
I have a feeling that the review dequeue logic may not be working properly. A change was made awhile ago after the Barbequeue that dequeues old, low-weight posts if the conditions in the answer there are met.
@Spevacus That's really recent but the problem must have existed for as long as I've had an account (months). There are only 7k posts with 0 reviews and 3k with conflicting feedback (a lot of which probably has a consensus) so the real queue is probably not bigger than 10k
@IanCampbell ahhh, I see the "ER" part of the product name. It's suspicious to me, but I personally wouldn't red-flag it until a spammy answer appeared.
Laurel and Ian need to duke it out and see who has to change their chat identicon...
@Laurel It may be slightly bigger since I think the weight threshold is ~5 and there may be a few that're a bit over that, but yeah I think there's definitely something not working properly.
@Laurel IMHO, and I'm not 100% sure of the project's guidance on this, but I'd only TP it if it had spam content not a spam author, unless it was a seed for s spam answer. I think we aim for catching content, not users (despite a couple mechanisms for watching users).
@Laurel I agree! I personally am too simple-minded to bring that criteria on-board, but some seeds are obvious enough that it helps us catch the subsequent spam-answer (by the same user).
I think a good proportion of them are marked after-the-fact, having seen the spam-answer already.
@Fastnlight The Joe Rogan show is in the middle? I mean, I only know of it by proxy but I'd have expected it to be more right. However, it being very far down seems appropriate from what I know of it.
@JeffSchaller They can't be the same user, right? Since it's shown on a deleted post that must be the real ID, not a nickname. It's only a coincidence that it matches up with the real ID (which was also the username) on ELL
