@VLAZ That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@VLAZ That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@VLAZ That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@VLAZ That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Anerdw It's a data recovery company. Seems like slim pretext to advertise the company as an answer. It might just be a misguided user but I don't have a lot of faith in 1-rep users who post an almost NAA with a link.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in body, link at beginning of body, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title (123): Where to buy genuine LED headlights? by Thắng Mạnh on money.SE
@Spevacus Wondering if you could retest my duplicate close PR. The recent change to add voluntary rejection required me to modify it to work with it, and I'd like to confirm that it still works.
Having said that... You can absolutely set up a condition specifically for politics to flag at 192/1/2. I don't think anyone has done that, but the preview seems to think it's 100% success rate.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (295): What is a Vancouver Citation Generator? by BookMyEssay on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, link at beginning of body, link following arrow in body, potentially bad keyword in body (237): What is Nagano Tonic? by Healthcare on stackoverflow.com
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in body, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (150): Buy Vape Online by Marco Schulz on meta.SE
@Mast build checks are now complaining: "test_blacklist_integrity - Failed: watched_keywords.txt:66798:Duplicate entry guo[\W_]*+wengui (also bad_keywords.txt:2641)" ... so I think you succeeded in putting the entry on both lists, but I think it would be better to leave just the blacklisted versions and remove the watched version
@DavidW This is the sort of thing where we'd really like to see a custom flag, btw. It makes sure that, among other things, the user receives a mod message about the issue.
@Mast I don't have both brain cells working together yet, so while your thought sounds familiar, there's something different about this situation. Earlier, I found where Cow blacklisted this entry, and that's as far as I've gone
Searching the transcript, I see several crossovers where the website blacklist is "abused" for some specific spam/words, and a "keyword" blacklist is added for a domain, to give hits extra weight. At first glance, it seems like the crossover website entries had extra bits in the regex that matched more than just the bare domain name, so that may be why those didn't trip the build-checks
(that is, maybe they weren't exact duplicate regexes across the various lists)
