[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, potentially bad keyword in username, username similar to website in answer, +1 more (147): Custom Plugin: WordPress Frontend Edit Cannot Update by avijovo on stackoverflow.com
@Fastnlight I've cleared my feedback because I didn't check the post for being AI-generated, but I'd point out that a history of spam posts doesn't mean that every future post is spam. I think that a non-spam post should be fp and if/when spam is edited in, that post would be marked tp. Cc @Cow
@Fastnlight I'm not going to speak for the project here, but if I can tackle the easiest case, if we've watched a keyword or website from that spam, then I personally wouldn't worry about blacklisting the user -- we'll catch future (similar) spam. Or we'll miss it / catch it later. My eye is on FP here, and I suppose I'm sometimes too optimistic about people.
@Cow IMHO, that's not enough (for me); spam is spam and not-spam is not-spam.
@Cow That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
I think it's unusual that a particular user would spam one site to SE, then switch and spam a different site to SE. usually it's the same site or product over and over
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin body, mostly non-latin title, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (158): آنالیز سئو سایت - SEO Analyses? by Farzaneh Ahmadi on meta.SE (@Ollie @Ethan)
@Vickel That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Vickel no bother at all, but brace yourself for disappointment :) I'm not a huge proponent of forcing in watches when there's already something that triggers a report. I'm sure there's a smart reason for it, and it might be so that there's an additional regex that can be blacklisted to give the post more spam weight in order to flag it into oblivion. I personally just watch for the websites to become blacklistable, but it's probably a good goal to have non-overlapping keywords as well
I got curious and so searched for all the times I've used watch-force and was surprised to see quite a few. The first few random ones I clicked on appear to be websites that had been masked by a keyword (keyword was watched already and I wanted keyword.com)
I've stopped using it much lately; particularly with apk websites, since they're already caught -- I just wait until those hit 5/0/0 for blacklisting
some day, I'll be good at using chat. today is not that day
@Vickel I'm a simple man, so I'm not trying to persuade you to do it "my way" -- that's just how I get through my day here :)
for instance, one of those mousehacker terms was already 4/0/0, so it's almost ready for a blacklist-keyword; I'm just glad that some people here keep track of that, because I don't
