If an answer gets six R/A flags on per-site Meta, will the poster get a rep loss (for their account on the main site)? Or is that only a thing for SE main + MSE?
@Ethan Not going to do that, but in this case it’s a user with a small bit of rep (under 25) posted a R/A answer on per site Meta, so I was curious (swearing at a policy announcement but nothing else), so I was curious
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:03:29 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/333928?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=ell.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:03:43 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/284473?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=salesforce.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:03:57 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/682701?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=tex.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:04:11 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/496013?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=askubuntu.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:04:25 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/3406460?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=math.stackexchange.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 03:04:40 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.4/questions/408961;1301749?key=IAkbitmze4B8KpacUfLqkw((&filter=!scxINmJWAnjuckNJkP9YfbG196DrCj)DDXQjRKUGfp-QzZ3b1nRh1Qitw7)FdyW_)iLrL8TBxFYZ1&state=PublishedAndStagingGround&site=superuser.com
@ThomasWard if you mean my PR from a couple of years back, I have been intending to get back to it; it's just not been a priority, as doing manual edits is not that much more inconvenient (the exception being when I want to promote something from a watch to a blacklist, which requires multiple changes, so can't be done directly on Github)
but I have been toying with the idea of automating some of the things I have been doing, probably from Halflife
and then it needs to have some sort of external API, where a chat command is obviously a strong contender, as that's already an existing mechanism
the bare commands should not be too hard to revive, but my original attempt had a bug which I never got around to being able to repro properly
but for usability there should perhaps be higher-level commands like "take this domain and watch its current IP address(es) and NS"
IIRC there is a Teams post of mine from some years ago where I outlined my process for IP and NS watches
which should probably be codified so that others can see what I'm doing and why, and perhaps pick up when I'm away if it's perceived as valuable
or indeed it could be automated (in which case we could probably also automate some of the other chores, like watching a new domain when it is confirmed as spam)
^ cc @Makyen
"codified" as in included in the wiki doco for when to watch or blacklist something
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in answer, bad ns for domain in answer, blacklisted website in answer, linked punctuation in answer, pattern-matching website in answer (423): Compile TCP IP Server with MSYS2 and C by loor loor on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ns for domain in answer, bad keyword in answer, blacklisted username, blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, +1 more (356): IP Whitelisting issue - AWS by pal patil on stackoverflow.com
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in link text in body, bad keyword in title, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (265): Web Design Company In Chennai by layla on meta.SE (@Ollie @Ethan)
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
