@tripleee A normalized version, {{'9715647065447'}}, of that pattern is already on the number blacklist. You can use !!/bisect-number +9715647065447 to determine which entries on the number lists match that pattern, which would tell you: Matched by +9715647065447 on line 801 of blacklisted_numbers.txt: +9715647065447 found verbatim
@tripleee A normalized version, {{'9715647065449'}}, of that pattern is already on the number watchlist. You can use !!/bisect-number +9715647065449 to determine which entries on the number lists match that pattern, which would tell you: Matched by +9715647065449 on line 3387 of watched_numbers.txt: +9715647065449 found verbatim
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Glorfindel I found more information on metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/post/421808 that led r to flag it as undisclosed affiliation. Yes, it's an old post, but the point stands. FYI in case you'd like to revisit your fp feedback.
