Is saying "Source/Disclaimer: I'm the creator of bigtree ;)" enough when you mention bigtree in all your posts? I feel it is overly promotional IMO and over the line, but I could be wrong (see this post)
A quick search indicates 7/14 answers mention bigtree, which isn't too bad assuming there's disclosure in all cases.
And each of the bigtree answers look tailored to the asked question (at least they're not duplicates of each other), so I'd say it's ok. You can still raise a flag if you want, but I don't think it's really necessary here.
@cocomac OTOH, it looks like they've posted answers multiple times before (there are 2 older answers by the user from at least one different account here stackoverflow.com/questions/72618673), which have been mod-deleted, so maybe there's more to what's going on than what's publicly visible). I'll raise a flag on it.
@cocomac np. Based on comments on the MS history for the user, it looks like tripleee has already raised a flag about this, but I've raised one anyway.
^ Despite no other hits, I don't think this pattern is too specific, so I'm inclined to watch it, but it doesn't seem liable to generate many FPs. That said, feel free to remove it if it's problematic
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, username similar to website in answer, blacklisted user (177): Present perfect continuous ✏️ by F and P Plumbing on english.SE
sometimes Smokey forgets to respond to these and sometimes I guess it's just a timing issue (I committed another change to Github directly just about at the same time)
@Makyen yeah, run_tests.sh works fine but I was too distracted to remember to run it; it happened many times in the past, so I figure I should automate it
good tip about enabling Github Actions in my fork, I'll look into that
one CI is better than no CI if I'm too lazy to have both
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: no method found with this name at 07:19:30 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: no method found with this name at 07:19:32 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
@Mithical hmm, but then many sites will have no contact
somebody who understands Javascript could probably tweak the code for that but I'm not sure I can tell whether this is an improvement or an unnecessary change; maybe check with V2Blast?
@SmokeDetector Google translation from Farsi: "My fellow countryman, I am really sorry that these idiots did not give you any help. At least give a short answer."
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
