@Ethan That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in title, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (103): online casino in south korea by casino oline on apple.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with a link in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (85): Mobile app design by emthi basha on stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 04:38:37 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 04:38:55 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 04:39:09 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 04:39:24 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 04:39:38 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions?site=stackoverflow.com
@SmokeDetector fp- Borderline: user has promoted the service before, and linked article was written few days ago, but affiliation is disclosed in this answer, and the promotion is solicited.
@cigien That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer and Bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@RobertLongson That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer and Bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@cigien That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer and Bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ns for domain in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in username (294): thankyou for your post, good job by Budi on superuser.com
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in body, messaging number in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (137): MiClient - CPQ + CLM? by sonam singh on video.SE
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in answer and Blacklisted website in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@cigien That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@VLAZ if it's a money mule gig, the undisclosed risk far outweighs the pay even if that's realistic; but typically, they overblow the money expectation too
@VLAZ oh it was obscured so far that I didn't see it
