@Spevacus No, I just check it whenever I see the numbers pop up on the tab to indicate a new message. Also, I'm fairly sure I have a script running that pings me whenever a spammy-type post is reported... it's from rene, I think.
@Ollie That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@Jesse Post 1: Could not find data for this post in the API. It may already have been deleted.
@Spevacus That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
What would be a good "minimum weight" value for me to set on Metasmoke so that Smokey can more easily use me to flag? I just lowered from 280 to 260, but I don't really know what that actually means.
SD has cast a few flags on my behalf during this latest spam attack, but maybe I should be allowing more.
Something that's somewhat working against you is that you do not yet have the "Core" role. Having the Core role means you're more likely to be chosen for autoflagging.
There's also metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/reasons which lists some reasons & weights. I'm curious what others use as well; mine's up at an arbitrary 269.
Most of the time, though, this spam is getting deleted before all of the chosen autoflaggers have been able to have their flags cast. In your flag history, I noted that Smokey recently tried to cast a flag for you twice, but both attempts failed (presumably because the post was already deleted)
So, while you're about ... is it much trouble to grant me SD privileges in SOBotics? No big deal (I have them in SOCVR) but I sometimes reply from the "wrong room", which is mildly irritating.
@Machavity Not sure (sorry, I mistakenly had you as an RO). But double-beep is about (said I needed RO and admin approval) ... I'll ask them and get back.
@cigien Weird. I edited the post (adding code fences) and tried (but failed) sending an fp- report in SOBotics. Maybe that failed reply upset something, somewhere.
@SmokeDetector tpu- User has posted 2 answers, both linking to cucomm. The answers don't appear to be relevant, It appears to be a new product, and these are the only hits for this name on the network. Likely spam. Custom flagged.
@cigien That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@AdrianMole Oh, that's very odd. If it failed, it should have just failed, rather than send a different feedback. BTW, you should be able to change the feedback on the MS report directly now.
not sure, i don't see the tpu anywhere, unless you used some tool that cast a tpu (flagging a post using the tool that autoreviews the post via MS can do that)
(it's why I don't use the tool anymore and manually report my feedback)
@ThomasWard There was definitely a tpu feedback at some point. The thing is, I can't think of any action Adrian did (2 fps, one of which failed, and an edit to the post on the site), that would have caused a tpu feedback. Perhaps it was just a misclick.
@cigien no idea, if an edit review triggered a tpu then it's possible, but that's dependent entirely on the userscripts and how they handle it. The fp feedback is what shows on MS right now so that tpu is already invalidated
@ThomasWard Any of the script that I have that could send tpu (i.e. Advanced Flagging) would also have raised a spam flag. I have no flag on that post.
tpu- feedback received on [MS] [\\🍪 \<>< (877)~947~7788 🍪 ‘‘hElp.micRosoft’’.cOm 🍪 🍪 ‘‘talK to a pRrson’’ ><><>\🍪 \](//stackoverflow.com/questions/70191788)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (113): How to download TS . video file? by Mr Peo on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (140): Slow Web site speeds by Thảo Nguyễn on stackoverflow.com
