@Nick That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen I'm curious, why watch superhotplace as a word on its own as well as the domain? and if you want both, why not combine to superhotplace(?:\.com)?
@RyanM That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body, Potentially bad keyword in answer, Toxic body detected, and Toxic answer detected; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen there's some discussion in SOCVR, but I don't think that was actually spam... it's the token associated with the somewhat prominent Brave browser. It looks like just a poorly thought-through suggestion. The user also has plenty of non-spam contributions on the main site.
I encountered a spam answer here and flagged it as such. Here is a copy in metasmoke. Later, I noticed that this type of spam isn't noticed by SmokeDetector; one of the reasons is that the domain (sites.google.com) is used frequently for legitimate purposes. This spammer makes sure their links ar...
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.