@hyper-neutrino Yeah, that's perfectly fine. If you want to change the feedback, as opposed to deleting it, you can just give the new feedback on MS, and it'll overwrite the feedback you gave via FIRE.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@cigien Thanks. BTW: If there's a mod or room owner around who hasn't yet pinned any of the semi-recent previous "links" messages (i.e. any with the same content), you can just ask that person to pin the most recent links message, rather than reposting a new one for them to pin.
The reason I have in the past posted a new message is that each RO or moderator can only pin a specific chat message once for up to 14 days (i.e. you can unpin before that, but it auto-unpins at ~14 days). I've normally noticed that the message has become unpinned when there's nobody around who can re-pin the old message, and I can't pin the same message a second time. Thus, I've generally just posted a new message and pinned the new message.
@Makyen Ah, so that's why you've been reposting them. Noted, I'll check if there's someone with pinning powers around next time. That would be preferable in fact; there's 3 of the "links" messages cluttering up the list now :p
Oh, it looks like the starred list can be manually edited. Well, there's that problem solved :)
@cigien Room owners and moderators can cancel the stars on messages. While I can scroll the messages down on the starboard to see all of the ones shown in the room, I don't do so very often, so wasn't noticing that the older ones were still there.
@cigien Nope. The only way to remove something is to cancel the stars on a message, or have enough other things which are stared such that the algorithm that's used to determine which starred messages are seen in the room pushes them off of the display.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title (44): Agen Slot Online by cicijunita on meta.SE (@Ollie)
even if it's mildly related it's not a good answer because other answers are much better and it's not even on-topic because it doesn't talk about anything to do with publication
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, +1 more (491): Rejuv Boost CBD Gummies by Grijonimax on drupal.SE
@Ollie That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Mast I absolutely have to pile on to the congratulations others gave. Congratulations! I'm really happy that the community stood up for you, you seriously deserve it. You look good in blue! Have fun handling our spam flags :)
