@VictorVosMottor '操它' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
> Mostly non-latin body, mostly non-latin title ---------- Mostly non-latin body - Text contains 2 non-Latin characters out of 2 Mostly non-latin title - Text contains 2 non-Latin characters out of 2
@VictorVosMottor That pattern looks like it's already caught by Mostly non-latin body and Mostly non-latin answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
> Url in title, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username ---------- Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 300-306: [/url] Potentially bad keyword in title - Position 300-306: [/url] Potentially bad keyword in username - Position 300-306: [/url] Url in title - Position 0-28: https://ru.stackoverflow.com
@Yatin That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
unwatch healthy?\W*choice(?:\W*cbd)? the last ? makes cbd optional leaving us with healthy?\W*choice that has a lot of FPs on SE. (20 for "healthy choices") Most of the TPs on MS are covered by other, more direct watches like URL watches.
Matched by the following regexes: healthy?\W?choice\W?cbd on line 1721 of bad_keywords.txt healthy?\W*choice(?:\W*cbd)? on line 12024 of watched_keywords.txt
@Yatin I don't see where you're getting your numbers. That watch is 14 Total / 5 TP (35.71% TP) / 9 FP / 0 NAA and doesn't match the "healthy choices" and 20 FP which you ascribe to it.
Note: I'm not saying it should stay, or that it can't be improved. I just start to have a problem when I go to investigate something and see significantly different data then is reported.
@Spevacus Checked their revision history, as of right now they haven't vandalized anything in 23 minutes and all vandalized posts look like they've been rolled back.
@RyanM I just select the previous version in the edit history, and write "Reverted Vandalism" in the edit message. It always works. Are you talking about something different?
@RyanM No, you don't have to manually copy anything. When you click the edit button, there's a "Rev" button, where you can just click the one you want to "rollback" to. I just did it for the latest SD report, and it takes just 3 clicks. Apart from writing the edit message of course.
OTOH, it *is* significantly more effort for 2k users to properly review and approve your "rollback" than it is to actually perform a rollback. In order to properly review a non-2k user's "rollback", the >2k users need to *go through the entire post* and verify that you did nothing other than replace it with the prior version (because *some* people *will* make other changes at the same time). Even after that's done, the system doesn't make it clear that it's actually a rollback when looking at the edit history (i.e. everyone looking at it has to wonder if there were other changes). I would *…
Honestly though if I were reviewing an edit with the caption "reverted vandalism" and it changed the post from "asdlkjaslkdjhfalskdjhf asdjklfasldkhfa skjldfhasliu" to something useful-looking with no glaring issues, I'd just approve it without checking the edit history, because it's obviously an improvement.
That would probably allow someone to trick me into approving an edit to change it to a completely different post, but...that seems like an unlikely attack.
And if they fixed some issues while they were at it, that's also fine generally, though I suppose they might include some well-meaning but wrong changes.
Yeah, especially if I saw the "Please don't vandalize ..." canned comment by the same user, I would probably accept without reviewing it thoroughly. I do see Makyen's point though; it would be nice if >2kers could see that the edit was to a previous version, instead of it just looking like any other edit.
