@Yatin That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@RyanM That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, pattern-matching product name in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (294): What kind of Drew Carey CBD Oil? by MartinaHartey on apple.SE
@SmokeDetector tpu- custom flagged: Clearly not a real question, links to a video with 8 views uploaded in the past 12 hours. This post clearly exists only to promote the video.
I know there are more than enough such questions.
But can anyone explain to me why this question is not SPAM? On concrete example.
The question contains link to a product and its added simple for the link building.
Also the question is unclear and does not provide minimal explanation.
If it is a ...
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad pattern in url body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, +1 more (480): ontario farms hemp oil by LauraJohnes on apple.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body, no whitespace in body, no whitespace in title, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +2 more (397): hddddddddddddddddddddd ✏️ by SHAKABOOM on english.SE
@VictorVosMottor That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Yatin Yes, being able to suggest a rollback would be nice. You can simulate one by editing an earlier version of the post, but it's not nearly as clean as an actual rollback and reviewing such a change is…challenging. To review such a change, it's necessary to make sure the person suggesting it didn't make any other changes at the same time, which means comparing the entire post to the old version, which isn't what the review shows. It's way easier for a 2k+ user to just make a rollback.
