@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (36): Handwriting speed by kshithi alva on writing.SE
@Mast That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Mast Why not? It doesn't seem likely to generate FP at all, and it technically qualifies for blacklisting. I agree that it's not clear they're part of the same campaign; is that the reason?
Wait a sec; ""and at least one of them is below the default autoflagging threshold (currently, 280) and no older than six months." means the one post that is below 280 needs to be no older than 6 months, right?
Actually, I'd expect a comma after the parentheses if all the posts needed to be no older than 6 months. The rest of the text uses the Oxford comma consistently as far as I can tell.
If that's true, then I'd expect it to be "... autoflagging threshold (currently, 280) ,and none older than six months". The italics on the "and" is used in other bullets, and I just added the bold to emphasize what I mean :p
@Makyen Can you please clarify how the 1st condition of the blacklisting websites advice should be interpreted?
> The site has at least five hits in metasmoke, with no false positives, and at least one of them is below the default autoflagging threshold (currently, 280) and no older than six months.
