[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, pattern-matching product name in body, potentially bad keyword in body (292): EZ Releaf CBD Oil by KyraHoeg on apple.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, username similar to website in answer, blacklisted user (137): Office 365 vs SharePoint by Saketa on sharepoint.SE
@tripleee I gave tp feedback to a post thinking it was the first case of undisclosed affiliation, but user is already blacklisted. Is it ok to leave the tpfeedback, or should I change it?
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@SmokeDetector Copied in its entirety from the linked blog post, which has no clear license (the "Licence" link on the page leads to a 404). Should be deleted or made a comment with just the link.
@RyanM That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee FWIW I suspect the mods are already aware of the situation, given that the user is suspended and the SD report was triggered by an edit from a moderator.
We're typically given this guidance, which mentions that the feedback that should be given is based on its content when translated. Apparently being on the wrong site in the wrong language alone does not make it tp-able.
You're forgetting that quite a few people don't know the site is in english, partly due to autotranslate tools. Hammer them, yes, but red-flagging and destroying accounts over it?
I see no evidence whatsoever for that claim, aside from the policy established by Charcoal.
Which is well within their purview, but standing policy on SE for many years has been that posting nothing but gibberish is sufficient grounds to destroy an account and/or otherwise banish them from the site.
"Cats aren't allowed to walk across keyboards" is the traditional refrain.
Similarly, we expect you to be paying at least a modicum of attention to the site you're on.
@CodyGray but within this chat room we are more concerned over getting incorrect feedback into metasmoke ... you can provide useful feedback and still take the action you prefer
though I'll note there is now also a discussion over in SOCVR over the same post
@tripleee Yes, someone already pointed out the Charcoal policy. I was unaware of that, and it seems counter-productive to me, but I am aware of it now.
