I'm gonna leave that one for someone more experienced with regex optimization to review...it's pretty slow, but my attempt at speeding it up isn't bearing fruit.
!!/reject 5313 "A couple of FP's on an SE search, and doesn't appear to really be spam. It's just where reddit static files are kept. Or... were. Reddit doesn't seem to use it anymore, I don't think."
!!/reject 5320 "Of the 7 TP, the lowest weight is 287. A search of SO suggests that it's common, though not necessarily at word boundaries. This seems more like coincidence than a particular spam pattern. We also have arrow-based rules, such as 'Link following arrow'. Note: the GitHub comment is misleading due to searching without \b bookending."
@RyanM Please provide an adequate reason for rejection (at least 20 characters long) so the user can learn from their mistakes. Use -force to force the reject
We try to only blacklist websites that've been recorded in Metasmoke at least 5 times over the course of 6 months (and have no false positives). Do you see it quite frequently?
@RyanM Probably a better interpretation of the wording. On the topic of this site though - what do you think about blacklisting it? No FPs, found nowhere else on SE, a mod's mentioning that it's a pretty consistently spammed site. I don't see the harm in it, plus they'll see it appear in their chatroom now.
I know, I try but the prev ones where handled by community and I only have them because the username used was similar and it got pointed out in a custom flag.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching product name in title, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (394): Where To Buy Slimtone Advanced Diet? by sfislimtone on askubuntu.com
@SmokeDetector fp- Comment on the question that got them blacklisted: "I don't know how to differentiate these between spam + misguided". I feel like they might be misguided.
> Do not vandalize your posts. By posting on this site, you've irrevocably granted the Stack Exchange network the right to distribute that content under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license for as long as it sees fit to do so. For alternatives to deletion, see: I've thought better of my question; can I delete it?
