User Research International has been frequently posting and reposting in Jobs "Research Study" listings. These are not contract or career positions. I've been flagging them but they keep coming.
Please reach out to them to adjust their behavior or do some more drastic action.
@gparyani That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer, Pattern-matching website in body, Bad ip for hostname in answer, Potentially bad keyword in answer, Bad ip for hostname in body, and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@gparyani That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer, Pattern-matching website in body, Bad ip for hostname in answer, and Bad ip for hostname in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, +4 more (591): Revita Skin Cream by tyubgart on graphicdesign.SE
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, +1 more (586): Ketofit recenze by robertyounges on meta.SE
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer, Pattern-matching website in body, Bad keyword in answer, Bad keyword in body, Bad ip for hostname in answer, and Bad ip for hostname in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad ip for hostname in answer, Bad ip for hostname in body, Pattern-matching website in answer, and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, blacklisted website in answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer (260): Health Risk Probability by rodneyiller on math.SE
@double-beep It was a website which was being added to the keyword blacklist instead of the website blacklist. Was there a reason to use the keyword blacklist instead of the website blacklist?
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, body starts with title and ends in url, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title (196): goketoganic.com/ by beamlust on graphicdesign.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ns for domain in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, +5 more (688): Ryzex Male Enhancement by Robrtrown on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +6 more (693): supplementslove.com/kgx-keto/ by game32 on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer (63): Oracle 11g Report Query by prayaag tech on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in body, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, +2 more (395): How accomplishes Formax Lean work? by Colesiester on askubuntu.com
@double-beep That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in body and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@SmokeDetector Starting to get sketchy. The user does disclose affiliation with the article, but doesn't disclose their affiliation with the linked GitHub. Next time is spam