> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username ---------- Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 0-7: adarose Potentially bad keyword in title - Position 0-7: adarose Potentially bad keyword in username - Position 0-7: adarose
@thesecretmaster The option_id one is, basically, "the post is now deleted" (commonly from the post being deleted between obtaining the option_id and sending the flag; i.e. a race condition). The third one is the SE API cutting off access due to too many requests (which can be just not obeying a backoff). Fortunately, at this point, the SE API only blocks access for a relatively short time.
The second has the form of what's typical for the progression from trying to flag a deleted post to being blocked. I suspect that it comes from the SE API.
My experience is that the SE API can give various error responses (e.g. CORS) when you are between a backoff and being blocked. The error responses are even common after the backoff period has expired.
The last I looked at the code (quite a while ago, a year? maybe), there was at least one path which appeared to have MS rapidly run through trying to flag with every user who was eligible to flag, regardless of the responses from the SE API indicating that the post was deleted. IIRC, at the time I was looking at the code, the responses for this situation were specifically not logged from the point that the post was deleted to the point where more significant issues resulted.
@double-beep huh! Mental failure, then -- maybe I set it up (once) and forgot about it. My memory was that I never fully signed up, but I'm obviously mixing two things up.
!!/bisect </a>, which looks almost too simple of course, but I'm also not sure about using the stein repo and if what affects it might have on everything other than just enabling Virgl. So if anyone knows of a way to add a virtual gpu that would simply make sketchup see that hardware acceleration is enabled I'd really appreciate it!</p><p>I also guess I could go buy
@fooot Matched by (?:(?<!<\/?code>.*?)buy\b(?!.*?<\/?code>).{0,400}?<\/?a(?=(?: [^>]*|)>)[ >]\W*|\W*(?<!<\/?code>.*?)<\/a>(?!.*?<\/?code>).{0,400}?\bbuy)(?#buy before, in, or after a link within 400 characters without code; when watched, was 3077/2878/194/14 minus 12/2/10/0: 2018-12-14T21:43Z, or so) on line 7112 of watched_keywords.txt
@SmokeDetector The original might be TP, but this has been edited by a mod. Admittedly, the mod stated in a comment that it was NAA, but they chose to only edit it, not to delete it, on 2019-08-19.
