@gparyani A better way to handle something being detected inappropriately in a username is to give fpu feedback. Using fpu causes the active SD instance to ignore detections matching that user's username. Using ignore causes only that post to be ignored. Thus, fpu will prevent that post from being detected due to the username and any future posts by that user being detected. Both feedbacks are scoped only to the current SD instance.
@gparyani Unfortunately, like the username whitelist, user blacklist, etc., ignore is specific to the SD instance that is running at the time the feedback is given.
@gparyani While the feedback is MS, the lists I mentioned are stored in each SD instance. Keep in mind that you can also add/remove users/usernames from the lists via !!/addblu, !!/rmblu, !!/addwlu, and !!/rmwlu. But, yes, it would be nice if they were shared between instances. Having that happen was one of the benefits that helios was supposed to provide, and, I thought, Socket Science.
@NisseEngström That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
