[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +10 more (1089): www.fitnessway.org/vital-keto/ by xuxyooix on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in answer, blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (174): AWS VPN Connection by alin carter on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +3 more (597): pilpedia.com/opti-farms-keto/ by ginyet201 on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (185): A simple SQL request by kimperly on stackoverflow.com
OK. Nick's looking at it. I'm not going to try to translate because it's tech babble that doesn't compute... but... it sounds like they fixed something that fixed something that revealed a bug they'd never run into because of stuff being broken.
(reference - Kelly Johnson was an engineer who led Skunk Works on the U-2 and SR-71. He was so good at estimating aerodynamics that his boss once said "That damned Swede can actually see air.")
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +3 more (589): ozvish.com/keto-hack/ by hazifarimm on drupal.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted username, offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected (253): Nicer Output in GAP by Niggerhater on math.SE (@FrenzyLi)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title, potentially bad keyword in body, +2 more (493): fairsupplement.com/choice-labs-keto/ by choicelabsketo on android.SE (@AndrewT.)
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
Failed audit here. Can somebody explain why this answer was deleted as spam? Apologize me, I'm not familiar with awk, cut or sed, but their tag info looks suitable for POSIX question.
@SmokeDetector This is a self-answer. Based on comments and the content of the question, it appears the user was intentionally posting this question and answer to somehow manipulate reputation. I think they thought they were going to get 2 rep for accepting their own answer. I consider it intentionally abusive of the system.