[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, repeated URL at end of long post: This is the fundamental wellbeing by Wourt19 00 on graphicdesign.SE
tpu- by Tetsuya Yamamoto
CI on e944e6b succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, +4 more: x4up.org/grs-ultra/ by ubzvakadp on askubuntu.com
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in body, Pattern-matching website in body, Blacklisted website in body, Pattern-matching website in answer, Bad keyword in answer, and Blacklisted website in answer; use !!/blacklist-website-force if you really want to do that.
@Andy Why does the response payload have the number of items in it as a separate key? Most programming languages should let you get that directly from the array.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, +3 more: x4up.org/grs-ultra/ by user264934 on apple.SE
@JF and @quartata I added the number of items for ease checking how many items there are and validation of how many there are. The same reason SE adds it to their API responses. If you don't want it there I can pull it off
@JakeSymons - A few people have asked you to stop doing 'why' when you can get the same result from Clicking the MS link instead. Would you be able to click 'MS' in the future so it doesn't fill up the room, please?
You never responded to my question, @JakeSymons
Someone specifically asked you not to do 'why' for 'offensive body detected' yesterday too.
and honestly, nothing bad will happen if someone did flag and it got validated. Smokey will be suspended for a few minutes, someone will ping me and I'll ping Shog to unsuspend
Or I'd just do it if it was super clear cut.
Shog or some other somewhat-neutral moderator to review it
and we'll track down the flagger and explain some things
@JakeSymons - A few people have asked you to stop doing 'why' when you can get the same result from Clicking the MS link instead. Would you be able to click 'MS' in the future so it doesn't fill up the room, please?
Metasmoke is so pretty anyways, go and admire its elegant totally-not-stock-Bootstrap design
@quartata what about having a three strikes and your out policy. Using why three times or the overuse of it could result in suspension form chat. Can we pause the chat for those users
@Mithrandir I am listerning. I understand looking at all your reputations that you are much higher then me. Clearly as a minor I need to accept I have no experience in this forum. Thank you for trying to help but it proably best if I just left, I clearly need to get much more experience before even attempting to come on a forum like this
mostly we all just have different paces of developing different things. i couldn't for the life of me figure out how socialising worked until i started getting a grip on it in the last couple of years of high school -- until that point i was perpetually feeling like i was maybe a year or two behind whatever other people around me had worked out.
There are 171 sites, I'm sure you have knowledge in one of them. "Easier" is relative. For me, SO is easier because I'm been programming for...a while.
@JakeSymons Don't participate for only the reputation and fake internet points. Do it because 1.) You know the topic and want to share your knowledge 2.) Want to learn more about the topic (you'll be challenged on answers, figure out if you are right by testing you assumptions) 3.) Participate in all aspects of a site. Don't focus only on bad content. There is a lot of great content around the network
If you're looking to socialise there's a number of other chats better positioned for that — I consider this one to be more or less a work channel, we're busy watching out for spam and handling it as it comes, and discussions usually only pertain to doing that one job effectively.
I got this call from Microsoft, it was obviously fake and they said my computer wasn't working. They took me through all these steps which I pretended to follow( I did it really slowly asking them to go through everything) after 1 hour on the phone I eventually confessed - I have a Mac!
