[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, +1 more: Best Natural Skin Care Cream by Uickgfbnckz on askubuntu.com (@ThomasWard)
tpu- by tripleee
CI on df4c178 succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, pattern-matching website in body, repeated URL at end of long post: Fast Muscle Gains by javlinhurkin on apple.SE (@CalvT)
> Copied from wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktipat), username is spammy. Maybe the answer should be deleted and the username reset to default?
That sound good?
> careersjobsinpakistan.com One of the best Latest newspapers advertiseing website which is published daily based ads for job seekers go to this link to find any jobs. careersjobsinpakistan.com for Latest News updates for Pakistani people or world news onlinepakistanofficial.com
@SmokeDetector @Wrz could you modflag this answer with something along the lines of 'Spammy username, same user plagurised content here <http://hinduism.stackexchange.com/a/18215>, maybe the username needs to be reset?'
@tripleee Sure it would. I'm not so sure though that SE would like it if we shared what essentially amounts to a scraping service for the worst posts on the network with other providers
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +3 more: nitroshredadvice.com/zyacin/ by bh14591 on apple.SE (@CalvT)
@Magisch no need to ask Pops. Our data is our data, we can do as we like with it, pretty much. I'm not so convinced it'd be useful, though, and I have no idea how to let relevant people know it's available.
The only thing that would be ambiguous would be whether our data based on CC BY-SA (made sure I wrote that right...) licensed content has to be licensed the same
@ArtOfCode Actually, we cannot do everything, the data is still licenced under the "Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike" because it comes from StackExchange
@Cerbrus When you swapped the class to the h2 in FIRE, you didn't change the target. So FIRE is looking for const h2 = $('.fire-popup-body > div.fire-post-title > h2');, which obviously doesn't exist anymore.
@ArtOfCode how on earth would we go about licensing that? Would it be MIT/Apache because it was produced by Smokey, or would it be owned by Undo since he hosts the server, or would it be owned jointly by all of the people who have MS integration tokens, or...?
@quartata the guidelines are 'when the admins think you're ready'. I'd be fine with giving you code access, given how you've shown your skill and trustworthyness in -NG, but I haven't seen any reason why you need them for the current Smokey - you haven't submitted many code PRs/blacklist requests lately that I know of (unless if I haven't been paying attention). If you can show that you do need privs, then we would definitely consider it, but unless if you need them, there's not much of a point
in giving them to you
@ArtOfCode the data
Or would it be CC0 because that's the MS code license?
TL;DR: the person or legal entity that created or generated the data owns the copyright. In this case, much of our data is machine-generated, but machines can't hold copyright. Public domain, technically, but Undo could claim distributor's rights.
ideally I just think we should have someplace to point people to that assuades legal teams' fear of using the data or graphs and analytics generated from it for whatever
I like the lack of spaces around the slashes in Art's instance but starred that comment just so we might establish consistency through one person instead of two :P
It also doesn't matter for me in what direction we resolve the inconsistency, but looking at the status now I can also see that Undo has added another instance to the list with the spaces
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, repeated URL at end of long post: Zyacin: The Best Apple? by sinaphad on apple.SE (@CalvT)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +3 more: healthpurelives.com/embova-rx/ by samythronk on askubuntu.com (@ThomasWard)
I'm really new to Ruby and I'm trying to understand if there's a specific time when I should use "" vs ''.
I've been using single quotes most of the time because it's easier to type but I'm not sure if I should.
e.g. get 'user/new' vs get "user/new"
When I first learnt to program I learnt with double quotes, and it's stuck with me ever since, which is why I default to them. But I'm always happy to comply with style guides
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, +1 more: healthpluscogni.com/max-testo-xl/ by achraf.jhadi on askubuntu.com (@ThomasWard)
I'm really new to Ruby and I'm trying to understand if there's a specific time when I should use "" vs ''.
I've been using single quotes most of the time because it's easier to type but I'm not sure if I should.
e.g. get 'user/new' vs get "user/new"
