It's... hard... to argue in favor of writing an algorithm and making a bot spend time calculating which of the two flag types to use when they are, in actuality, the exact same flag. It's not even Coke vs. Pepsi, it's Pepsi vs. a second bottle of Pepsi that's using a different but still valid Pepsi logo.
@Undo this would probably have been a more sensible query, but brain fart apparently makes me do funny things with arrays instead. shrug if it works, it works
> The pagesize parameter for this method is unbounded, in acknowledgement that for many applications repeatedly fetching from /sites would complicate start-up tasks needlessly.
@Magisch shrug, but this is MS we're talking about. By the time you've waited backoff, the delay between returning the original from the SE API and sending the new request to it has already created enough of a buffer.
@JF So instead of indicating with an icon, how about we separate them out. That'd be adding a default_scope of where(:is_auto => true), which'll take care of all the existing things. Then where we want to show manual flags, FlagLog.unscoped will include manual ones.
@Mithrandir the answer to that question is that it was pinned, unpinned and then repinned. That messes with existing star statuses. I'm on mobile so I can't test exact sequence and causes right now
I've just updated FIRE (raw). It will now both submit MS feedback, and post SE spam flags for tpu- feedback, provided you authorized MetaSmoke to do so. Note that there's no error handling other than it saying something went wrong, yet.
3
It also doesn't "know" you flagged something as spam, if you did.
Went on facebook to check out how all my classmates from high school are doing, a couple are pregnant, some (assuming wise) ones deleted their FB, and a bunch are posting about how they blew their paycheck at day 5 in the new month already
On another note, I see 4 or 5 requests to the same posts-by-urls endpoint for one report. That's... maybe not ideal? I might write an MS API framework that scripts can use to cut down on that number