@Undo just because they're awesome elsewhere on the network doesn't even mean they're active on a day to day basis on the site they're nominating themselves on
IMO the important factors you should consider when choosing a moderator for a site is how active they are on that site, their flagging history, their review history, their meta history, the types of meta posts they made (are they all mundane 'merge these tags' things or do they actually start meaningful discussions that end in results)
how active a user is elsewhere on the network is irrelevant, they could be the best existing moderator on the network but if they only log in once a week on the site they're nominated on then they're not going to make a good mod on that site
@Undo I welcome civil active human contributions to the site. Please do start with posting some questions and/or some answers. We're trying to grow a very young, small site; key in my mind are that we also have to maintain a motivated and supportive moderator team. Making busy-work for the moderators isn't going to help. Posting great new content is.
@hichris123 Heh, no, I think you've missed what I was trying to drive it. I guess I was too concise. I welcome conscious, human, considered participation. I'm not a big fan of actions merely triggered by a search, on a site as young and small as ours. It's really lovely that attention here has turned to our baby of a site, and I'd very much welcome any new awesome content that folks here would like to contribute.
I get a real buzz of enthusiasm here for the StackExchange ethos, and we could really use your energy.
@hichris123 We deal with the micro (how can I live more sustainably, in my own immediate sphere of influence), and the macro (what are solutions to regional, national or global sustainability problems).
It's generally about finding ways to use finite resources in a way that doesn't deplete them to the detriment of future generations.
I've had large falling outs with SU because I took part in one of their cleanup efforts and basically flagged all the things because I only had ~200 rep
while simultaneously flooding the suggested edit queue with edits
@kalina valid actually stores it in the autoflagger memory, and from the button up top you can generate JS to mass flag without hitting the throttle. It just means "the comment is a valid flaggable comment and I intend to flag it soon"
So it seems like it would be ($x^m +y^n - z^r)/ p_1 = remainder$ $0$, however, how can this work since the sum shouldn't be close to $p_1$? (Also, $x^m +y^n$ should equal $z^r$, so some results from this should have $x^m +y^n =z^r$.) — hichris123yesterday
