« first day (3673 days earlier)      last day (442 days later) » 

20:02
This user has two identical answers, both of which advertise their own product (disclosed). The two answers are on different sites: stackoverflow.com/users/18231860/max-travo
@Fastnlight Yeah I'm not sure those quite classify as spam, but it is definitely a link-only answer, so I'm just going to flag it as VLQ on both sites.
VLQ, or naa?
Either one would work. VLQ is just generally recommended for link-only answers because the flag gets marked helpful if the answer gets edited, but if you don't want that to happen then NAA is probably fine.
👍🏻
747
Q: Your answer is in another castle: when is an answer not an answer?

Shog9I think we can all agree, this sucks: If you've been around a little while, you've probably encountered hundreds of answers like this in various forums, some of them even marked as "The Answer" by well-meaning1 forum admins looking to close a thread. We could try to enumerate the commonly-observ...

CC @Jesse
20:12
sdc report stackoverflow.com/a/77628917/10871900 "undisclosed affiliation, user is core contributor of GitHub repository linked on site, github.com/leo-hydraulic, github.com/hydraulic-software/conveyor/…;
sdc report stackoverflow.com/a/75537960/10871900 "undisclosed affiliation, user is core contributor of GitHub repository linked on site, github.com/leo-hydraulic, github.com/hydraulic-software/conveyor/…;
Dang, you beat me to it (I was about to report it)
20:14
I even joined their Discord to check it xd
@Mast Yeah I've seen that before. The advanced flagging script raises a VLQ flag for link-only answers, which is what I was going off of, however according to that post it would be NAA. The analogy makes sense, but in practice there appears to be an overlap from what I've gathered.
!!/watch- conveyor\.hydraulic\.dev
@Jesse Have mods handled your vlq flags as helpful?
PR#9214 ("Jesse: Watch conveyor\.hydraulic\.dev") opened by SmokeDetector
20:15
@Jesse The flags don't end up in the same queue, they are not equal.
@Fastnlight I typically use VLQ (on SO) and it worked out for me quite well until now
Until now?
@Fastnlight I cant tell the difference between a mod and a LQA queue review, but yes they generally are marked helpful.
@Fastnlight Can't say anything about the future
@Jesse and that
Ah, but you haven't had any issues so far?
👍🏻
@Mast I didn't say they were equal, I'm just saying there's an overlap from what I've seen. However I wasn't aware they go to different queues, I thought they both went to the LQA queue.
@Jesse No. And that's the problem with people repeating the information you just did.
They don't know.
108
Q: How do I properly use the "Not an Answer" flag?

user102937 What is the "Not an Answer" flag and what is its purpose? When should I use this flag? When should I not use this flag? But I'm still not sure if I'm using the flag correctly... An answer is "Not an Answer", but the flag was declined or disputed! The flag was marked helpful, but the answer wasn'...

20:19
965 post flags, mostly VLQ (I think) and the cases that were declined were mostly me being stupid/for other reasons
VLQ is for non-salvageable posts, gibberish.
@Mast well link-only is salvageable by the poster
NAA is for people posting things that may be sensible, but don't constitute an answer. It should've been a question, a comment or fleshed out into a real answer.
@Mast and non-English post
@dan1stiscrying And thus not VLQ. They are NAA.
20:21
@Mast Aren't gibberish posts r/a
@Fastnlight There's levels of gibberish.
@Mast are the VLQ and NAA flags really handled differently (except wrt editing) on SO?
VLQ as by Advanced Flagging, see https://charcoal-se.org/scripts
- Link Only
- Library
- Non English
20:26
I typically use VLQ if I think the author could improve it - if they edit it and it doesn't get any better, I still have NAA as an option
@dan1stiscrying VLQ gets automatically marked helpful, once the post was edited
@Vickel the issue isn't it being marked as helpful, it is the post being out of the review queue (I think)
@dan1stiscrying I can't speak for SO, but I am a moderator on a different SE site and thus happen to know a thing or two about flags. Unfortunately how flags work exactly has changed a bit over the past decade and the changes haven't been very well documented. Moderators were more or less forced into actions depending on what kind of flag was raised but the current problems are less severe than they were in '16 when I roasted about it. When in doubt, VLQ is safer than NAA.
@dan1stiscrying best i found is this: meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/314679/…
Recommending either works is an oversimplification and puts people on the wrong path though. I'm looking for up-to-date properly sourced material, but search tends to fail me when I need it most.
20:34
@Fastnlight R/A is a reasonable flag on actual gibberish when posted by a user that doesn't have other constructive contributions. In other cases, please raise an NAA or VLQ flag. If it's a question, then vote/flag for closure instead of VLQ. Please see: answer to: "Is a post like 'assdddsssafffwq' spam?"
@Mast yeah that's why I use VLQ in most cases
The system prescribes that when in doubt, you should be using the 'in need of moderator attention' option. But that's theory. In practice not many people take the effort to explain what is wrong with a post.
And on SO we're talking about so many flags, they got just about a flag culture of their own.
yeah and I'm mainly flagging stuff on SO
There's this from Cerbrus (note they're explaining why the flags don't apply to the post mentioned, not indicators on when to flag it but that's easy to extract).
9
A: Is this answer NAA or VLQ worthy?

Cerbrus NAA: It is an answer. A wrong answer is still an answer. VLQ: It is not gibberish, or another language. Neither of those flags apply. If the answer is incorrect (wrong language), downvote and move on. You could also comment on it if you feel adventurous.

Which basically boils down to what I wrote earlier.
20:59
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body (1): Wordpress : My HTML seems to load before my css ✏️‭ by Chakir‭ on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword with email in body, blacklisted website in body, potentially bad keyword in body (249): Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Tracing and Recovery‭ by Commander James‭ on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Misleading link (24): Solving a steady-state PDE‭ by blov‭ on scicomp.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (185): Why can a long jumper jump further by flipping?‭ by Maurice Derek‭ on physics.SE
Makyen/EC2-linux: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Cant see the (Chainlink)requested data in my smartcontract‭ by Derek‭ on stackoverflow.com
teward/Thoth: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
Restart: API quota is 65645.
22:06
API quota rolled over with 65376 requests remaining. Current quota: 79999.
stackoverflow: 5721
math: 1593
electronics: 376
ru.stackoverflow: 351
physics: 330
superuser: 306
askubuntu: 268
mathoverflow.net: 259
tex: 244
unix: 209
serverfault: 200
gis: 191
stats: 183
blender: 164
salesforce: 142
ell: 129
philosophy: 127
mathematica: 123
es.stackoverflow: 120
diy: 119
scifi: 110
rpg: 110
academia: 108
codegolf: 106
dba: 88
bitcoin: 73
codereview: 72
worldbuilding: 71
apple: 70
pt.stackoverflow: 66
ethereum: 65
music: 64
hermeneutics: 63
judaism: 61
softwareengineering: 60
!!/approve 9214
!!/approve 9213
!!/approve 9212
Could someone help me with this? I think the domain should be watched and the answers deleted as spam (actually, the search was returning 2 more results by the same user earlier so I guess a mod already took action on it). chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/64829977#64829977
@Jesse To avoid SmokeDetector reporting posts too slowly, you can report at most 5 posts at a time. This is to avoid SmokeDetector's chat messages getting rate-limited too much, which would slow down reports.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer (batch report: post 2 out of 4) (93): Calculating standard deviation after log transformation‭ by M.K.Dan‭ on stats.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer (batch report: post 3 out of 4) (93): Deriving the conditional distributions of a multivariate normal distribution‭ by M.K.Dan‭ on stats.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer (batch report: post 4 out of 4) (93): How to deal with Z-score greater than 3? ✏️‭ by M.K.Dan‭ on stats.SE
@Laurel I reported and spam flagged them all.
22:44
Thanks
@Jesse User blacklisted (22771062 on stackoverflow.com).
23:06
Makyen/MS-Relay: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev ee0f84fecd (Makyen: Log as debug MS WebSocket messages) (running on Makyen/MS-Relay, Python 3.11.3)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in body (95): Top Notch Hacker‭ by Kassandra sonneman‭ on security.SE
!!/watch- digital[\W_]*+pro[\W_]*+hackz
PR#9215 ("Jesse: Watch digital[\W_]*+pro[\W_]*+hackz") opened by SmokeDetector
@metasmoke Digital as opposed physical hacks?
Life hacks, perhaps?

« first day (3673 days earlier)      last day (442 days later) »