@Mast No previous posts. Using not-just-created accounts is a common spammer strategy. Destroyed the account (and another spammy one from the same IP), though.
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:31:29 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:31:43 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:31:58 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:32:12 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:32:26 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:32:40 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
@Makyen IMO, it is FP. It could be a legit mistake, but them forgetting eggs and flour makes me skeptical. That said, because I found a dupe target and someone (legitimately) answered the question I'm inclined to go for FP for this one as it has a dupe and a (good) answer, but blacklist them in case they're trolling. That said, if the local mods want to nuke it, they can. I'm open to evidence of trolling, though
@cocomac If you feel the question was FP, then it shouldn't be reported. If you want them blacklisted, that had already happened with the tpu feedback on the answer. Now, with the question reported, the question is likely to get FP feedback, which will remove the user from the user blacklist.
@Makyen I’m torn between tp and fp. I feel the question could be legit (mistakes happen), but the poor self answer and the (hopefull) obvious answer was why I wasn’t sure. But others can of course give feedback as they want. I could totally see it going either way, hence reporting without feedback
@tripleee That pattern may be a North American number. If it is, please use a format which starts with an optional 1 followed by possible separator text and has the main number in the format 989-485-0370 where - could be a single alpha character or any [\W_]*+. Alternately, you can add the comment (?#IS NorAm) to the end of the pattern to force also using the alternate normalized form, or (?#NO NorAm) if it's not a North American phone number and it's incorrectly recognized as one. Perhaps try !!/watch-number 989-485-0370. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
