@SmokeDetector Overall, I think this is borderline. An SDK isn't exactly what they were after; however, it is relevant and affiliation is disclosed. Not flagging for now.
@RyanM I think the fact they say "Contact me at email" puts it into the spam category, because they're trying to direct to off-site communications. If it haed been just the site link I'd be less inclined to flag it, but in this case the email part makes it a bit more spammy.
[:60198920] <processed without return value> [:60198915] <processed without return value> [:60198887] <processed without return value> [:60198856] <processed without return value> [:60198835] <processed without return value> [:60198817] <processed without return value> [:60198792] <processed without return value> [:60198788] That message is not a report.
@Ollie Only feedback to actual reports and, as you did, make sure that you either include a - after the feedback type or use an alias (e.g. k = tpu-) which has the- as part of the alias. In this case, the issue is that you tried to feedback to something that wasn't a report, which will always result in SD telling you about it. For the feedback which you just gave, if you had sent sd 2fp- 5k then SD would not have replied.
