@cigien Sure, but even if the question asks for it the affiliation should still be disclosed (particularly if it's in multiple answers, which it wasn't here). I do get your point, though; I didn't custom flag. The only thing missing was disclosed affiliation, which they could edit in. It's gone now; did they?
I'm trying to revive my metasmoke Dockerfile, on bundle install it says some components need Ruby 2.6 so I guess that's what we are currently using ...?
so far it's looking like I will mainly have to peel off the mountain of kludges which were required to get a Docker image on Ruby 2.4 but now the base is 2.7 and so the Debian image is also significantly newer (spanking new, even)
This guy has a lot of answers promoting pdfmate.com across 3 sites and elsewhere on the network. Look like spam? I can't find any concrete affiliation (and a moderator has asked them), but they were all posted around the same time; within a week AFAIK.
@SmokeDetector tpu- user spammed a lot recently (undisclosed affiliation to their github), and has just just posted another answer linking to their medium article without disclosure. Custom flagged.
