@cigien Only in the same regex if they're actually related.
Now, keto's keto so I don't mind much, but we try to keep campaigns separated. It's entirely possible you're targetting multiple campaigns with the same regex here.
@Makyen I mentioned it in here because of the name, the related fields (photography, etc), and the fact that it voices concerns over their content being stolen. It's a fair amount of similarity with the Mel campaign I felt, even though the text itself is quite different from that campaign.
@cigien I can see some similarities, but it contains nothing of the portions which were in the "Mel" campaign which made that campaign clearly bad. It has none of the attempts to induce fear for their own site/project in the reader. It has no way to contact the person or download a malware program, etc.
Well, I should have made it clear what similarities I saw, instead of just saying it looked like "Mel" spam. We can share some of the responsibility here :)
@Ollie That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer and Bad keyword in body; in addition, the regex contains an unescaped "."; in most cases, it should be "\."; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Ollie That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer and Bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Undo Yeah, two FP in 24 hours is not an auspicious start, but doesn't seem to be enough to really say "don't use this", particularly when what was detected in both of those could easily be filtered out from the detection.
@Undo I don't have any objection. It might be a good idea to do some searching to see if what was detected in those two posts is a pattern which continued (i.e. a imgur image file href with a space as the link text). If so, we could modify the detection to just ignore such.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted username, few unique characters in answer, offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, potentially bad keyword in username, +1 more (338): What is meant by DDBB? by fucking chupapija on dba.SE
@Undo Yeah, I don't immediately see a reason why questions would trigger that, unless SE was inappropriately formatting something that was actually innocuous. I don't know what might have caused those FP. We've only seen that pattern in one other post, which was an answer.
