« first day (2500 days earlier)      last day (1327 days later) » 

5:00 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): XAMPP on local network "overrides" server IP by user3513782 on stackoverflow.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at beginning of body, pattern-matching website in body (334): Regardless, if your dream is to achieve a lone digit by Hero Ogony on stackoverflow.com
 
tpu- feedback received
 
I love seeing "(deleted less than 20 seconds after being reported)"
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ip for hostname in answer (1): Customize color for the active window in Gnome Classic? ✏️ by DeltaMachine on unix.SE (@Pandya)
 
5:04 PM
The SmokeDetector project is stupidly effective.
5
 
naa- feedback received
 
@DanielWiddis me too. Good job guys ;)
 
Most casual visitors will never come across spam on the network because of how effective Charcoal is.
 
@rene Because a commit was added to SD, which needed to be pushed to all instances in order to accomplish what it was written for. Thus, the instances were all instructed to pull an update at about the same time. The update caused each to reboot, which synced up their 6 hour auto-reboot schedules.
 
I would expect those reboots are for availability. Having them reboot simultaneously and then become synced is maybe not the best measure. I propose to make the reboot schedule be moved to 6 to 8 hours ...
I see myself out.
 
5:10 PM
🚪👈
 
@rene you could add a random number of minutes to whatever fixed schedule.
 
For those out of the loop...
 
Heh, I missed that. :)
 
It's rene's favorite meme. Once you realize that, you'll never miss it again ;)
 
Adding a random number is still applicable. :D
 
5:15 PM
!!/alive
 
@Mast ... good question
 
Did the spammers go to sleep early?
 
It's flippin' Monday. Where are they?
 
@Makyen FR: timed delay
20-30 seconds at least
 
@rene There are multiple reasons for the reboot, but, yes, the primary one is to have a backup method for the instance to be restored to functionality when something goes wrong, which, hopefully, a reboot will fix (although our algorithm for trying different commits could use some work).
I agree that having the times the instances reboot be staggered would be better. In the past, I've manually adjusted it, but to do a manual adjustment requires remembering between the reboots, which is not as easy as remembering that it should be done when reminded by seeing the reboot notice. :)
As to having the time be random: We could do that, but there have been times in the past when I've used the fact that reboots are consistently 6 hours apart as an aid to debugging. So, I'm not too keen on making it random all the time.
 
5:18 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially problematic ns configuration in body (1): Access JSON decoded field in Golang by Kavish Gour on stackoverflow.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
Another whitelist idea: \\w\.\\w\(\)
 
Is MS slow or is that just me?
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): Linux SSH Superuser by Prostyle1337 on stackoverflow.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
fp- feedback received
 
@metasmoke Going with TP on this one because the user's history seems to be pretty relentlessly promoting this site's articles. Willing to have someone else review it though.
 
@Spevacus Concur based on history. Would have naa'd otherwise.
 
@DanielWiddis No you wouldn't have; that's a question! ;)
 
@Spevacus Ah, indeed! In fact, I voted to close it about 50 minutes ago. NAQ? :)
 
5:31 PM
@Spevacus Oh my, indeed.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, no whitespace in answer, repeating characters in answer (264): Expansion in flat spacetime by STEMguy24 on physics.SE
 
tp- feedback received
 
@Mast I have not noticed an issue, and brief testing doesn't indicate that it's slow for me.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in body (96): Find Attribution Data revenuecat by Маркіян Витрикуш on stackoverflow.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
5:39 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer (62): Who decides whether it's normal to eat something in a certain fashion? by kmjhyt on judaism.SE
 
tpu- feedback received
 
!!/watch- drugruger\.com
 
@Makyen Ordinarily it takes just over 10 seconds to request a simple regex match, it takes almost thrice that long at the moment.
 
iBug/Coral: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
 
5:40 PM
tpu- feedback received
PR#4881 ("Spevacus: Watch drugruger\.com") opened by SmokeDetector
 
!!/approve 4881
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (2): Putty Private/Public Key Pair - Generate Certificate by kmjhyt on superuser.com
 
Looks like we got a bit of a campaign.
 
5:45 PM
And I thought today was going to be boring.
 
6:00 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Linked punctuation in answer, one-character link in answer (141): Visual Studio 2019 doesn't indent in JavaScript after [Enter] by Rhonda Churchill on stackoverflow.com
 
@SmokeDetector k Spam link in plagiarized text. Plagiarized from this article.
!!/watch- homeheavenz\.com
 
PR#4882 ("Spevacus: Watch homeheavenz\.com") opened by SmokeDetector
 
!!/approve 4882
 
6:23 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Misleading link (22): NS3_Can't run vanet-routing-compare.cc ✏️ by Azra on stackoverflow.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer (86): Which microphone is used during FaceTime video call in iPhone SE? by a deleted user on apple.SE
 
fp- feedback received
 
sd why
 
@NobodyNada [:55615280] Bad keyword in answer - Scam aimed at apple customers. Keywords: phone, support
 
6:30 PM
fp- feedback received
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer (1): How can I generate a temporary table filled with dates in SQL Server 2000? by Lunas Allen on stackoverflow.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
!!/test-q Nothing crazy going on here, just testing to see where p.id is caught.
 
> Potentially problematic ns configuration in body
----------
Potentially problematic ns configuration in body - Suspicious nameservers: all IP addresses for p.id are in set {'45.126.59.70'}
 
Known problem.
 
6:33 PM
Mhmm
 
main.app is another one.
Quite some of them really.
 
I'm mad that someone actually grabbed p.id and used it for... Whatever they're using it for.
 
@Spevacus A lot of names that short are either for porn or domain reservations.
This one is the latter.
main.app is from a business dealing in digital business-cards.
Something about blockchain and contact management jumbo...
 
@Mast A main point of using a construct like that regex is to catch when the spammer uses a mash-up like "truvalastaustralia52", which is a common thing for spammers to do, particularly in domains or URL paths. Based on the search results in MS, that particular regex one could use significant expansion to include terms which are being used in later spam. I'll make an update.
 
@Mast That's because it already had 5 spam flags by the time MS came back up
 
Well, if that isn't disclosed affiliation, what is...
 
fp- feedback received
 
Not a great answer, but it qualifies I guess.
 
Why do I always regret such things...
User is on a spree. May be harmless, may be not.
 
7:02 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ip for hostname in body (1): installing job submission management (eg slurm) on ubuntu 20.04 by Ryan Schubert on askubuntu.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in body, pattern-matching email in body (132): ever wanted to hack by Melissa Knox on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer, blacklisted user (255): What bug does this hacker want to exploit? by Melissa Knox on stackoverflow.com
 
tpu- feedback received
 
!!/watch- stocktipsandethicalhacking2020(?:@gmail\.com)?
 
7:09 PM
!!/watch-number- ‪ 1 (925) 291-0054‬)
 
What...
!!/unwatch- 1 (925) 291-0054‬)
 
@Mast No such command 'unwatch-number'.
@Mast No such item 1 (925) 291-0054‬) in watchlist.
 
What the heck...
 
@Mast Seems fine so far, they're answering questions that are about the service with links to the docs
 
7:11 PM
Can someone remove the last )? I'm not sure why it's in the post, but doesn't make sense to have it in the watch I think...
 
!!/test AKHBSD 1 (925) 291-0054‬) hdh
 
> Phone number detected in title, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title
----------
Phone number detected in title - Phone number: 1 925 2910054
Potentially bad keyword in body - 19252910054 found normalized
Potentially bad keyword in title - 19252910054 found normalized
 
!!/bisect 1 (925) 291-0054‬)
 
@Mithical '1 (925) 291-0054\u202c)' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
 
!!/bisect AKHBSD 1 (925) 291-0054‬) hdh
 
7:11 PM
@Mithical 'AKHBSD 1 (925) 291-0054\u202c) hdh' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
 
!!/bisect Dhdjssdfg 19252910054 hd
 
@Mithical 'Dhdjssdfg 19252910054 hd' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
 
....alright
 
@VictorVosMottor User blacklisted (407777 on ru.stackoverflow.com).
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user (71): Как добавить hr после каждой p? by Елена on ru.stackoverflow.com
 
@VictorVosMottor Why?
I mean, it could be spam from VK as a company, but my Russian is awful.
 
@Mast I suspect she's a troll. But i'm not 100% sure so i want to track her ;)
 
fp- feedback received
 
7:16 PM
!!/watch- stocktipsandethicalhacking2020(?:@gmail\.com)?
!!/watch- 1 (925) 291-0054‬
 
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
 
!!/unwatch- (925) 291-0054‬
!!/unwatch- +1 424) 274 2967‬‬
!!/unwatch- 424) 274 2967‬‬
 
@Makyen An invalid pattern was provided, please check your command.
@Makyen An invalid pattern was provided, please check your command.
@Makyen An invalid pattern was provided, please check your command.
 
watch-number perhaps?
 
7:16 PM
 
@Mast Yeah, the auto-formating is obviously missing something there.
 
@VictorVosMottor Well, it's clearly nonsense, beyond NAA.
@Makyen The ) at the end is intentional?
 
I know it's in the post itself, but does it make sense to catch it?
 
7:18 PM
@Mast No, I thought I edited it out, but it's largely "meh", because that detection tests both verbatim and with the non-number characters removed.
 
@Makyen So it will work regardless of whether it's there.
 
@Mast It is not a spam from VK, Elena today added a question (already deleted) about real nonsense though it was 100% nonsense. I don't actually know is it a troll or something else...
 
@Mast Yes, for the numbers list.
 
7:19 PM
Naturally.
 
@Mast translation of Elena's answer:
Link to a malicious site
The link you tried to follow leads to a phishing site that collects logins and passwords from VKontakte. Perhaps you received it from a user who, despite all our warnings, followed this link and entered the login and password from VKontakte, after which spam messages containing the link began to be sent on his behalf. Please notify the user who sent the link about this and advise him to change the password for his VKontakte account.

VKontakte always cares about your safety! [Wikipedia] [1]
 
Troll bot in practice, possibly.
 
@Mast no, i'm sure she s not bot but troll
 
@Mast Lately, a lot of trolls have been visiting. It is one of reasons i'm here ;)
 
7:27 PM
fp- feedback received
 
@Mast Actually, the issue was caused by invisible Unicode characters (this one).
 
@Makyen Yikes.
 
!!/watch-number- (925) 291-0054
!!/watch-number +1 424) 274 2967
!!/watch-number 424) 274 2967
 
7:31 PM
!!/unwatch- ‪ 1 (925) 291-0054‬)
 
!!/watch-number- 1 (925) 291-0054
 
@Makyen This had invisible Unicode characters in it.
 
MS doesn't print those either, it seems.
 
7:47 PM
!!/tea
 
@DanielWiddis brews a cup of darjeeling tea for @DanielWiddis
 
fp- feedback received
 
@Mast probably because they're invisible heh
 
8:20 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in username (1): Is it possible to clone only part of a git project? by CryptoGeek on unix.SE (@Pandya)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected (167): How do people encode WEBMs to to increase the end time? by Sex on superuser.com
 
tpu- feedback received
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Problem recreating black hole iridesium by johhk on blender.SE
 
fp- feedback received
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected, blacklisted user (238): How do people encode WEBMs to to increase the end time? by Sex on superuser.com
 
tpu- feedback received
 
8:33 PM
🙄
 
tpu- feedback received
fp feedback received on [MS] Problem recreating black hole iridesium
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (86): Will I get any visual benefit if I use CRF values below 17/18 in x264 (FFmpeg)? by Sexisfun on superuser.com
 
tpu- feedback received
 
8:53 PM
I thought rude flag deletion would result in some form of penalty?
 
You'd think so.
 
Unfortunate.
 
waffles, cat walked across keyboard
 
Interestingly other than the user, the third post would have slipped thru
 
@NobodyNada Tell your cat hello for me :D
 
8:56 PM
@Spevacus Both types of red flags are treated identically by the system IIRC
 
!!/watch-force ^.{0,15}sex.{0,15}$(?#SU troll)
 
@NobodyNada The regex contains an unescaped "."; in most cases, it should be "\."; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): Custom textfield delegate isn't working for second textfield by NewCoder on stackoverflow.com
 
fp- feedback received
 
!!/bisect Hack to prevent text
 
@NobodyNada Matched by hack(?:er)?\b.{0,50}\b(?:text|call|contact) on line 1017 of watched_keywords.txt
 
9:06 PM
tpu- feedback received
 
sd why
 
[:55617432]
Blacklisted user - blacklisted for //superuser.com/a/1587453 (https://metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/post/265731) by the metasmoke API
 
@SmokeDetector copy-paste of the opening dialog from The Bee Movie
from a known-troll user, too ^
 
@NobodyNada Just about to say that as well
 
Hm. I wouldn't say that's spam, do we Rude flag here? Or just flag for closure/deletion.
 
9:09 PM
@Rubiksmoose AFAIK the only difference is that spam posts, but not R/A posts, are used as review audits.
 
As a mod, I'd take any red flag on this type of post (assuming I already knew the context)
@NobodyNada Good point. I believe that is currect.
 
@Spevacus R/A is appropriate as the user is just trying to be disruptive
the reasoning in meta.stackoverflow.com/a/317611/3476191 applies here
 
Also abusing the system.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title (99): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page by user407882 on ru.stackoverflow.com
 
@Rubiksmoose we actually got some Meta flak for that, back before rude-flagging was implemented in MS/FIRE (so we flagged everything as spam)
 
9:11 PM
@NobodyNada oh yeah? I can see how that would be an issue on some sights for sure.
 
Are all autoflags spam flags? Or will it change them to R/A when specific reasons are met (toxic answer detection + bad keywords for example)?
 
Oh that's a good question
 
I know that SO takes Spam flags on R/A content and accepts them as helpful, I believe. Shog iterated on it in a meta post I can't bother to look for just now, but it's in the documentation for Smokey somewhere...
 
It's just the english wikipedia link
Maybe a confused user? Also maybe a bot.
 
On ru.SO no less. I'm thinking tpu with a R/A flag?
Not sure how ru.SO prefers their flags.
 
9:15 PM
@Spevacus Due to chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/11540?m=35745740#35745740, all autoflags are spam flags (Pops was a CM at the time)
but we should differentiate with manual flags, because R/A flagging will prevent posts from being used as audits
 
@NobodyNada That's an awesome analogy, lol. Gotcha, cool. I think most site mods will understand when they see that Smokey cast the first flag (or, if it didn't, probably be pretty lenient).
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): How to use Dask DataFrame with Numpy Busday_count? by md598 on stackoverflow.com
 
oh BTW, the idea that bees shouldn't be able to fly according to science is a myth. A silly one at that.
 
@Spevacus All autoflags are spam flags. The numerous times it's been brought up that R/A flags might be used, it's been refused, as handling the flags by the system is nearly identical, and making the choice between spam and R/A is "complicated", or is at least an additional complicated which isn't needed, given that handling of the flags by the system is nearly identical, despite that some people with a pedantic bend (including myself) feel better if the flag with the "correct" name is used.
 
fp feedback received
tpu- feedback received on [MS] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
 
9:18 PM
@Rubiksmoose Yeah, I personally would go with FP/VLQ for a first offense
 
@Makyen Thanks for the explanation, and I can understand being a bit pedantic about the flag choice.
 
weird. FIRE seems to have stopped working for me.
 
@Spevacus User is not blacklisted.
 
9:19 PM
@Rubiksmoose Hmm, MS is up and it's fine for me
1) do you get any errors, and 2) can you access metasmoke at all?
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): I NEED FRE VBUK OMG PLS I WILL GIV ME PET ADOPT ME by CoolFunnykid2014 on superuser.com
 
@Rubiksmoose Please define "stopped working for me".
 
Oh yeah to be clear, it isn't showing any icons or anything is what I meant.
neither here or in Tavern.
hmmmm
 
tpu- feedback received
 
@Rubiksmoose If you click on your userscript manager in the toolbar, can you see it?
 
9:20 PM
@Rubiksmoose That will tend to indicate a more general problem with userscripts, rather than just FIRE. Are other userscripts working?
 
Yup. I haven't changed anything either to my knowledge.
@Makyen Oh actually, no. So must be a browser/extention issue.
I'll bet a reboot fixes it
 
@Rubiksmoose Closing and reopening your browser will probably be enough
 
tpu- feedback received
 
@NobodyNada Yeah I tried that first. Reboot worked so shrug
 
9:28 PM
@Rubiksmoose What OS/browser?
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (160): Set custom Wordpress REST-API URL by Stephen Hawking on stackoverflow.com
 
Windows 10. Chrome
 
tpu- feedback received
 
Now that I think back, I've had this happen before.
 
9:29 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer (94): I NEED FRE VBUK OMG PLS I WILL GIV ME PET ADOPT ME by EZROBUXCLAPS2020SOEZ on superuser.com
 
tpu- feedback received
 
I thought we had that domain watched.
!!/watch- vbuksgenerator\.com
 
@Spevacus 'VBUKSGENERATOR.COM' is not caught by a blacklist or watchlist item.
 
Some 9 year old somewhere needs another hobby
 
Well, color me surprised.
 
9:30 PM
@Rubiksmoose good edit ;-)
 
PR#4883 ("Spevacus: Watch vbuksgenerator\.com") opened by SmokeDetector
 
!!/approve 4883
 
tpu- feedback received
 
@RyanM hahaha
 
9:31 PM
!!/watch bux\.dev
 
!!/watch ROBLOXGAMER123
 
!!/bisect free vbucks
 
Matched by the following regexes:
free[\W_]*+v[\W_]*+bucks on line 22908 of watched_keywords.txt
vbucks on line 23190 of watched_keywords.txt
 
9:32 PM
Added vbuksgenerator domain to MS, adding bux.dev now. E: Domains added and reports now have that domain in 'em
 
!!/unwatch free[\W_]*+v[\W_]*+bucks
!!/watch free[\W_]*+(?:v|[rdb]o)[\W_]*+bu[cksx]+
 
!!/test free vbucks
!!/test free robux
 
> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username
----------
Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 0-11: free vbucks
Potentially bad keyword in title - Position 0-11: free vbucks
Potentially bad keyword in username - Position 0-11: free vbucks
> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username
----------
Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 0-10: free robux
Potentially bad keyword in title - Position 0-10: free robux
Potentially bad keyword in username - Position 0-10: free robux
 
tpu- feedback received
 
9:46 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword with email in answer, bad phone number in answer, email in answer, messaging number in answer, +2 more (540): How do the Death Ward spell and the half-orc's Relentless Endurance racial trait interact? by Joan hardy on rpg.SE
 
tpu- feedback received
 
That user post was deleted and user destroyed within 35 second of spam posting XD
One of my co-mods was way on top of that (the destruction that is)
 
5 hours ago, by Spevacus
The SmokeDetector project is stupidly effective.
Your co-mods are warriors.
 
That they are :)
Maybe some of them are mages or clerics though
2
 
I'm pretty sure at least one of them's a rogue...
 
9:50 PM
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, Feb 11 '19 at 10:37, by Sonic the Introverted Hedgehog
Have we ever come across a spammer or troll who kept rolling back their post so as to keep invalidating red flags?
 
That sounds diabolical.
 
@Spevacus hahaha you aren't wrong
 
@gparyani I'm not sure. There probably has been. There's definitely ones which have done it a time or two on a post, but for most it's really unclear that it's been intentional when it happens. It usually happens because some "helpful" person has edited out the spam/R/A and the spammer/troll rolls back the edit (because the thing they wanted seen was gone). I'd note that even if they did keep rolling it back, those rollbacks would result in an automatic flag being raised for just the rollbacks.
 
I don't recall having seen this tactic in action.
 
I've seen cases where I suspect people deleted/undeleted posts to invalidate non-red flags, but I don't think I've seen anyone try it for red flags.
 
10:06 PM
I've seen a rollback invalidate red-flags. I'm unsure if I've seen it as an intentional tactic by a spammer/troll. It's not trivial to pull off (i.e. it takes a bit of planning), and a lot of spam/R/A accumulate red-flags too fast (i.e. because the flags don't break the grace period, it's often all one version; you'd have to plan an coordinate for it to be considered additional versions).
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer (33): Error while uploading zip file to lambda function by ajs on stackoverflow.com
 
^ User's looking a bit like an allspam situation: stackoverflow.com/users/14282775/ajs
Oh... well... I guess that works. Entire answer history just got nuked.
 
10:21 PM
tpu- feedback received
 
@SmokeDetector Undisclosed affiliation.
 
API quota rolled over with 8031 requests remaining. Current quota: 19999.
math: 724
stackoverflow: 446
superuser: 121
physics: 119
askubuntu: 96
electronics: 91
unix: 85
serverfault: 74
diy: 57
salesforce: 57
codegolf: 53
apple: 49
mathoverflow.net: 49
english: 47
worldbuilding: 42
rpg: 37
es.stackoverflow: 30
wordpress: 27
ell: 27
dba: 25
datascience: 25
chemistry: 24
law: 24
scifi: 23
workplace: 22
cs: 22
mathematica: 20
quantumcomputing: 20
hermeneutics: 20
aviation: 20
bicycles: 19
webapps: 18
ru.stackoverflow: 17
bitcoin: 17
security: 17
gamedev: 17
dsp: 16
quant: 16
Makyen/EC2-linux: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Does this count as breaking the first precept? by Samana Johann on buddhism.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer (33): ASP.NET Core Web API unsupported Media type by Cihan AŞAN on stackoverflow.com
teward/Osiris: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
 
10:42 PM
Makyen/EC2-num02: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev fc3d591 (Undo1: plan z) (running on Makyen/EC2-num02, Python 3.6.12)
 
Restart: API quota is 19914.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (35): Where to buy US repatriation and evacuation insurance only? by Nasorenga on travel.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in answer (78): Where to buy US repatriation and evacuation insurance only? by guest AOL on travel.SE
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): Does this count as breaking the first precept? ✏️ by Samana Johann on buddhism.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body (45): Trouble creating first game in Python! Syntax Error by Zzoltang on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): WhatsApp Web API - Passing Links with Spaces ✏️ by Sheets-User on stackoverflow.com
 
11:04 PM
fp- feedback received
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad asn for hostname in body (1): Iptables rules script problem by merfolds on unix.SE (@Pandya)
 
fp- feedback received
 

« first day (2500 days earlier)      last day (1327 days later) »