@EliahKagan That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
There are five hits in MS for mdiware.com, all recent, all below the autoflagging threshold, no false positives, and no hits in an SE search. So it seems to me the domain qualifies for blacklisting already. Any reason not to do so?
@EliahKagan While there aren't any codified rules that prevent this from being blacklisted, the fact that all the links were posted in a short time by one user makes me a bit cautious of blacklisting so soon.
@AdrianMole Yeah, I took the discussion in SOCVR and found the posts being talked about, and reported them manually
@EliahKagan In general, unless the activity is ongoing, I'd prefer to have something on the watchlist for a while first. However, if it is ongoing, it's fine to put it on the blacklist, particularly if it helps put ongoing spam over autoflagging.
It also depends on what the item is, because that will likely contribute to the possibility of FP posts. For instance, domains which are to something which we would tag as #drugs are quite unlikely to have real questions asked about them, although it is possible. Domains that are programming related, particularly if they have an API of some sort, are fairly likely to, eventually, have questions asked. I have not investigated this particular site.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword with email in body and Bad keyword with email in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
