Matched by the following regexes: quickbooks on line 175 of blacklisted_usernames.txt (?<=:?//(?:[\w-]*\.)*[\w-]*(?<\.com)(?<![./]serverfault\.com)(?<\.com)(?<![./]mathoverflow\.net)(?<\.com)(?<\.com)(?<![./]asus\.com)(?<![./]ibm\.com)(?:/[\w-]*)*)/(?:(?:how-to-)?fix-(?:error-(?:\d+-in-)?)?)?(?:asus|canon|epson|fire-tv|ipad|hotmail|hp-printer|lenovo|lexmark|quickbooks)- on line 1667 of bad_keywords.txt
@tripleee Are you sure you want to go with NAA on this post? It was explicitly designed to be detected and flagged by SD. It does, in fact, contain spam. If it wasn't explicitly asking to be deleted rather than spam flagged, it's something we would red-flag.
@ZachSaucier Hi Zach! That's a moderator thing and you should discuss it with site mods first, there's usually no need for escalation. Anyway, Charcoal HQ is not the right room for this sort of discussion. We just flag spam here and talk about flagging spam.
@ZachSaucier Well, there isn't just this magical place where you go and talk to CMs (for obvious reasons). The Tavern gets closest to that but none of the CMs are required to respond to anything there. I think the mod was just simply unaware of that
The insistence is a bit weird but I won't read too much into it.
If you believe the answer is not useful, you're free to downvote it. Flag it if you think it's an NAA, do everything the system has given you the power to do so. Then, if those didn't work and the outcome still seems wrong, a meta post specifically asking to be educated on why the answer is not NAA or useful, without any accusatory tone.
I'm explaining how I'd go by doing it.
That has nothing to do with SE or a mod's opinion and everything with how to win people over in public debates.
@ZachSaucier Well, the only way to achieve something is try to achieve it. Have a good time \o
A little off-topic doesn't hurt any chat and this isn't spam rush hour anyway
Thing is, in discussions like these, the very thing people do — get defensive and assume mal-intent — is the very thing preventing them from getting any results.
A different situation is where the conversation goes on calmly and even the mod delegates the flag or the decision to someone else. I know because I've seen it happen. I come from "small" sites as well.
FYI here is the response from the CM: "Community wiki is a very broken and obsolete tool, and this really doesn't require any kind of input from us. We wouldn't really encourage using the community wiki tool at all at this point in time, and there's no reason to argue about it further if the moderators have already decided not to use it."
[:51698428] <processed without return value> [:51698389] <processed without return value> [:51698325] <skipped> [:51698319] That message is not a report.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, +3 more (593): Nano XL UK Male Pills by smarterjulia90 on askubuntu.com
Hi y’all... would it be possible for SmokeDetector to not use the title of the question in its chat messages when it’s flagged that title as offensive? The question got cleaned up, but the chat message took longer for people to notice on since our chat room doesn’t get a lot of traffic.
@ColleenV maybe... that's not a particularly easy thing to do, though. I'll throw it in the issue tracker, but in the meantime feel free to just delete (or edit, if that seems more useful) reports like that
@ArtOfCode I edited it, but I thought I’d ask if it were possible :) It probably doesn’t make sense to not use the titles at all in the links. A question number doesn’t help much.
because it has several hundred thousand posts to search through, very little infrastructure to do it on, and about half a full-time dev working on it, if that
