[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad keyword in username, body starts with title and ends in url, +4 more (583): www.tevida-ca.com/ by Tevida on webapps.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad keyword in username, body starts with title and ends in url, +4 more (583): www.tevida-ca.com/ by Tevida on webapps.SE
FYI: ThomasWard has asked that, for the time being, Lunar be used in preference to Solar. Lunar's also been active longer, so has more state info stored.
Post 1: Already recently reported [ [MS](https://metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/post/159880) ] Post 4: Looks like spam but not reported: Post is bumped by community ♦️
This question is related to a post that showed up on meta.SO today: it seems like (self-)deletion of the question dismisses pending spam flags on answers.
This appears to be a bug, since this post (although on invalidation) says the flags should be preserved and not dismissed.
@SmokeDetector I'm specifically not watching programstore\.ir, because that would add a 3rd detection reason just for the existence of the domain. A 3rd detection reason would result in some autoflagging conditions being met.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, +2 more (492): Weight Loss 30 Days Program by user925174 on askubuntu.com
@SmokeDetector I'm specifically not watching programstore\.ir, because that would add a 3rd detection reason just for the existence of the domain. A 3rd detection reason would result in some autoflagging conditions being met.
@Machavity While i consider the significant majority of these, at best, sketchy, I have seen one reported here that said go download from X page, where that page then had download links that appeared internal, but then the internal download URL was redirected to the official Microsoft downloads. I still consider that one sketchy (I assume they are capturing traffic info), but it wasn't malware.
Note that I would have never clicked on the download link to find out about the redirect if there wasn't a comment on the post saying the downloads were actually from the official site.
@Makyen To be clear, the one that was actually using official downloads (through a redirect) wasn't the post reported above. The one I'm mentioning was from some time ago. I have not tested the one reported above.