@NisseEngström That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
It's not all that uncommon for us to change from an NAA evaluation to TP, based on the later actions by a person or multiple users wrt. a domain. After all, we are supposed to give people the benefit of doubt, but when their actions eliminate the doubt...
@SmokeDetector User lists the domain as their link in their profile. Thus, they are asking a question to which they already know the answer, just to get people to go to their site/mention their site.
@EJoshuaS Without going to the profile to see that it's the person's domain, it looks very similar to a lot of bad questions on SO.
@EJoshuaS If it wasn't deleted, I'd suggest a custom mod-flag informing them of the affiliation and that it needs to be deleted. But, given that it's already deleted and the flag disputed, there's not much more to do.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (295): It has grown to be a struggle for most by xvzijddy on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching product name in body, +3 more (789): healthytalkz.com/nitro-ultra-maxx/ by bobbiefulks on apple.SE
any other mechanism you can devise is fine of course but it seems like the simplest route and has the benefit of being reusable by anyone with the required Metasmoke privileges
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, +4 more (593): hbmbzone.com/ludicene-ageless/ by lunitasizz on graphicdesign.SE
tpu- feedback received
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +7 more (991): pilpedia.com/keto-burn-xtreme/ by coxaduv on askubuntu.com
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
### ReadTimeout on teward/Lunar Eclipse at 2019-01-22T06:22:49Z: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=10.0) File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/chatcommunicate.py", line 451, in __call__ result = self.__func__(*processed_args, alias_used=alias_used) File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/chatcommands.py", line 1393, in report output = report_posts(urls, msg.owner.name, msg.room.name, message_url, alias_used, custom_reason) File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/chatcommands.py", line 1611, in report_posts
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, +4 more (594): slimtonediets.com/think-tank-mind-ca/ by user132190 on graphicdesign.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body, no whitespace in body, no whitespace in title, numbers-only title, title has only one unique char (399): 1111111111111111111111 ✏️ by gobbycsbird on stackoverflow.com
Recovered from requests.exceptions.ReadTimeout: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=10.0)
### ReadTimeout on teward/Lunar Eclipse at 2019-01-22T07:15:24Z: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=10.0) File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/chatcommunicate.py", line 451, in __call__ result = self.__func__(*processed_args, alias_used=alias_used) File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/chatcommands.py", line 1393, in report output = report_posts(urls, msg.owner.name, msg.room.name, message_url, alias_used, custom_reason) File "/home/smokey/SmokeDetector/chatcommands.py", line 1611, in report_posts
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer, Bad keyword in body, Pattern-matching website in body, and Pattern-matching website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching product name in title, +1 more (589): Andro Testo Pro by kamyani on wordpress.SE
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer and Potentially problematic ns configuration in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (297): It is a blend of all wellknown and by fediyike on askubuntu.com
@SmokeDetector This is plagiarized with a spam link added. Potentially multiple sources (which need to be translated, but Google Translate provides an exact match to the text here, suggesting that this is also a machine translation). Some of the sources: here (code) and the first answer to that (text), text at end of post and code earlier on the page.
@SmokeDetector This is plagiarized from multiple sources with a spam link added. The first part is slightly modified from here. The 2nd paragraph starts from here. The whole thing may be at the spam link, but I did not go there to find out.
@TetsuyaYamamoto That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer and Potentially problematic ns configuration in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (397): keto shredded beef by melissajzamora on drupal.SE
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer and Potentially problematic ns configuration in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer, Pattern-matching website in body, Pattern-matching website in answer, and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +2 more (596): pilpedia.com/z-vital/ by jamarozuba on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad keyword in body (392): Apexatropin Ireland by RimiWimi on superuser.com
Can anyone point me to a SO question where running two independent functions at the same time in python is discussed? I can't find anything, must not be looking for the correct thing
Either that or a simple implementation of CE
I'm struggling with running the comment scanner and posting chat messages at the same time, with the delay between sending messages
but these days I would very much want to see something using async too, i.e. not really concurrent but effectively near real time as long as nothing blocks the async loop
Right now I have a function that I call to post the message, which includes a crude delay to avoid getting limited. But if I call it twice in quick succession, the first gets dumped before posting the message
What is the technical difference between a process and a thread?
I get the feeling a word like 'process' is overused and there are also hardware and software threads. How about light-weight processes in languages like Erlang? Is there a definitive reason to use one term over the other?
@tripleee since this discussion is going, I'd like to tell that I recently have an idea of moving all network-based checks to a separate thread to speed up findspam logic
I am trying to understand threading in Python. I've looked at the documentation and examples, but quite frankly, many examples are overly sophisticated and I'm having trouble understanding them.
How do you clearly show tasks being divided for multi-threading?
@tripleee I haven't figured out how to integrate asyncio into our findspam.py logics, so I think I'll proceed with an extra thread. Anyway, I'm expecting shortened time for scanning each post.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
What is the technical difference between a process and a thread?
I get the feeling a word like 'process' is overused and there are also hardware and software threads. How about light-weight processes in languages like Erlang? Is there a definitive reason to use one term over the other?
I am trying to understand threading in Python. I've looked at the documentation and examples, but quite frankly, many examples are overly sophisticated and I'm having trouble understanding them.
How do you clearly show tasks being divided for multi-threading?
