@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
Is this some kind of bizzare trolling? stackoverflow.com/a/54252091/1364007 - The text (talking about Lorem Ipsum) is copied from elsewhere and has nothing to do with the question (PHP errors).
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer, Pattern-matching website in answer, Potentially bad keyword in body, and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in body and Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in body and Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in body and Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially problematic ns configuration in body and Potentially problematic ns configuration in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer, Pattern-matching website in body, Potentially bad keyword in answer, and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Ramhound just to be sure we agree on definitions, "spam" is defined as unsolicited advertising, though you're also welcome to report obvious junk and abuse
merely being off-topic does not make a post spam, though
Question about phonegap was also spam, due to the links, can’t see any way it could be legitimate. First question was my mistake, was a legitimate, bad quy
I agree that it should be closed but in the absence of any indication that this user stands to benefit from someone clicking on one of the links, it is not spam
@tripleee The question sucks and is off-topic but what would it be flaggable for (other than OT) and a cross site dupe? I didn't really think for Charcoal that was something we should do a tpu on?
@Andy just the person I needed - using your StackAPI in a project (really useful thanks!) but when doing SITE.fetch('comments', page=1, pagesize=1, sort='creation', filter='!SWK9z*gpvuT.wQS8A.') it doesn't seem to respect the page and pagesize
It's doing what is expected. SITE.max_pages is set to 5 (ok, it appears I have an off by 1 error, but...). So, it's pulling 1 comment and starting on page 1. It sees you want 5 pages worth of comments, so it then pulls 1 comment (this is your pagesize) on page 2 and repeats. So you are getting pages 1-6 with 1 comment each
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching product name in body, +4 more (788): Bio Tech Pro Male Enhancement by BonniHaughh on stackoverflow.com
@iBug Here is a perfect use case use as main memory better than swap. Quote from the article:
"Western Digital and ScaleMP normally claim well upwards of 85% of the performance is retained using NVMe as main memory for applications like Redis. One does not need to purchase “M” series Intel Xeon Scalable CPUs and does not need to spend an enormous amount on large DRAM modules."
Have the quota allotments to SE'S API changed? I just realized that when I ran your code and didn't provide my token I got a quota_max of 20000. The docs still say it should be 10000.
Hm. I'll look into that in a bit. I got sucked much further into this than I expected :) Time to do some real work and I'll get this released in a few hours for you
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 15:45:50 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/206606
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 15:46:04 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/47249
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 15:46:19 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80498
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 15:46:33 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3078393
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 15:46:47 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/93110
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 15:47:01 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/3078412
