@SmokeDetector mighta been that Smokey had already run for 6+ hours so that isolated occurrence was nothing to worry (cc @ArtOfCode @micsthepick @EriktheOutgolfer)
WARNING: Last metasmoke ping with a response was over 120 seconds ago, forcing SmokeDetector restart to reset all sockets. 2018-08-30 14:07:18.645870 UTC
WARNING: Last metasmoke ping with a response was over 120 seconds ago, forcing SmokeDetector restart to reset all sockets. 2018-08-30 14:09:47.811505 UTC
WARNING: Last metasmoke ping with a response was over 120 seconds ago, forcing SmokeDetector restart to reset all sockets. 2018-08-30 14:10:17.841097 UTC
WARNING: Last metasmoke ping with a response was over 120 seconds ago, forcing SmokeDetector restart to reset all sockets.
The link takes me first to an advertisement, and then to a Harper's Bazaar listicle of classic movies, every single one of which is named. I don't know what's going on with this question, but I'm voting to close it. — F1Krazy8 hours ago
@iBug That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ns for domain in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +2 more: Praltrix Male Enhancement by Wrondmex on superuser.com
@doppelgreener That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@b_jonas That sounds like a worthwhile thing to have a bot looking out for, but as it isn't related to spam, I don't think Smoke Detector should be the bot doing it. Maybe you could talk to SOBotics about whether there's a cross-site duplicate detector bot?
@Glorfindel It's not spam, sure, but it's a case where we usually delete all but one of the questions, unless there are already answers on more than one when we notice, and write a comment to the user. At the very least, even if we don't delete, we want to add cross-links in all directions, which those users often forget.
@doppelgreener So it's not in the scope of Smoke Detector? Ok.
@JohnMiliter I can't seen to reproduce your review issue, it works for me. Any chance you have some extension like NoScript that's blocking javascript? Looking into the userscript thing now.
I just reset my token for FIRE, so that also appears to be working.
@doppelgreener @b_jonas SOBotics doesn't have any cross-site duplicate checkers. There's a dupe checker for some tags on SO, but that looks for when a question has been flagged as a dupe IIRC.
They do, not sure if it works cross-site. But it checks linked posts IIRC
Finding cross-site linked related posts doesn't happen because of the site design.
> Every 60 seconds, Guttenberg fetches the most recent answers (the "targets") on Stack Overflow. For each of these answers, possibly related posts (for example answers to related questions) are collected. All those posts will be checked for different characteristics (such as the Jaro-Winkler distance of the posts). If at least one of the characteristics meets the requirements, a message like this will be posted in chat: [image]
Only the checkUser command uses Google to find possible plagiarism, but it's limited to 100 calls per day. See stackapps.com/q/7197
@scaaahu You are not a privileged user. Please see the privileges wiki page for information on what privileges are and what is expected of privileged users.
@Zoe There were three spams by the same user on health, only two of them were detected. That was why I tried to report it. So, how do I do it if it happens next time?
> Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in username ---------- Title - Position 16-33: onlinechemshop.com Body - Position 16-33: onlinechemshop.com Username - Position 16-33: onlinechemshop.com
@scaaahu given your network-wide reputation, reviewing activities and meta posts, I'm in favor of giving you Smokey privileges after you read this page. Then, you can !!/report yourself.
I don't think anything got broken worse - just tried yarn install, sudo yarn install, yarn install with PATH pointing at rails's bin dir, and npm instead of yarn
@Undo Thought: In the deploy-ms repo, create a branch. When a dev pushes the deploy button, MS pushes a commit to that branch with the command git commit --allow-empty -m "Deploy started on <sha> by <username>". That'll let us keep travis history.
okay, this yarn thing is above what I'm willing to deal with right now. Maybe later. It shouldn't be hard to just make Cap run a command at some points, but I've already spent more time on this than I would just running yarn install when people ping me.
I do have javascript enabled, but other users can't reproduce the issue.
Regarding the userscript issue (the review issue could be anything, but I got a ruby error when trying to get an access token): I was thinking that it may have to do with the "core" privilege. I don't have it, but thesecretmaster (who tried to reproduce the issue) does have it.
I know that a lot of ms is restricted from people who don't have that role. Maybe by error, the ability to get access tokens for userscripts is only available for core users. That might be something to look into. Can other users with reviewer …
I do have an older version of chrome. That might be responsible for the review issue, but I don't see how that could prevent me from getting access tokens. I did post a screenshot earlier.
@JohnMiliter Your Chrome version is too old. A brief check of FIRE indicates it uses features which require, at least, Chrome 49 (2016-03-02). I didn't exhaustively check, just some likely issues, and stopped once I found an incompatibility. The JavaScript feature was destructuring assignment. I'm not sure it would produce the error in your screenshot, but it wouldn't work.
@JohnMiliter the error you got is indicative of rails-ujs, our UI driver, being inactive. I've only known that happen when JS is disabled or when an extension is interfering - do you have Privacy Badger?
