@SmokeDetector Prior to this being reported, a user removed all the spam portions and replaced them with [redacted]. So, while the original version is spam/promotional, this version is significantly less useful for us to capture.
@DJMcMayhem Yeah, I agree. Reporting it here was good. Thank you for doing so. I'm just frustrated with the user that edited the post, as doing so makes our task harder and potentially results in the post existing on the site for longer (fewer people easily recognize it as spam and it sets up the situation where the OP is likely to revert their spam back in, causing all spam flags on the edited version to be removed). :-(
Yep. I don't mind if people also CV, in addition to raising a spam flag, particularly once it's not as clear that it's spam. But, CVing instead of spam flagging is just ridiculous.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
